Results for 'Daniel R. Ciocca'
986 found
Order:
1 filter applied
- Manipulating the Alpha Level Cannot Cure Significance Testing.David Trafimow,Valentin Amrhein,Corson N. Areshenkoff,Carlos J. Barrera-Causil,Eric J. Beh,Yusuf K. Bilgiç,Roser Bono,Michael T. Bradley,William M. Briggs,Héctor A. Cepeda-Freyre,Sergio E. Chaigneau,Daniel R.Ciocca,Juan C. Correa,Denis Cousineau,Michiel R. de Boer,Subhra S. Dhar,Igor Dolgov,Juana Gómez-Benito,Marian Grendar,James W. Grice,Martin E. Guerrero-Gimenez,Andrés Gutiérrez,Tania B. Huedo-Medina,Klaus Jaffe,Armina Janyan,Ali Karimnezhad,Fränzi Korner-Nievergelt,Koji Kosugi,Martin Lachmair,Rubén D. Ledesma,Roberto Limongi,Marco T. Liuzza,Rosaria Lombardo,Michael J. Marks,Gunther Meinlschmidt,Ladislas Nalborczyk,Hung T. Nguyen,Raydonal Ospina,Jose D. Perezgonzalez,Roland Pfister,Juan J. Rahona,David A. Rodríguez-Medina,Xavier Romão,Susana Ruiz-Fernández,Isabel Suarez,Marion Tegethoff,Mauricio Tejo,Rens van de Schoot,Ivan I. Vankov,Santiago Velasco-Forero,Tonghui Wang,Yuki Yamada,Felipe C. M. Zoppino &Fernando Marmolejo-Ramos -2018 -Frontiers in Psychology 9.
- Reading Texts, Reading Lives: Essays in the Tradition of Humanistic Cultural Criticism in Honor ofDaniel R. Schwarz.Daniel R. Schwarz,Helen Morin Maxson &Daniel Morris (eds.) -2012 - University of Delaware Press.Distinguished contributors take up eminent scholarDaniel R. Schwarz’s reading of modern fiction and poetry as mediating between human desire and human action. The essayists follow Schwarz’s advice, “always the text, always historicize,” thus making this book relevant to current debates about the relationships between literature, ethics, aesthetics, and historical contexts.
- A Comparative Critique About the Advantage Assumption.Daniel R. Gilbert -1992 -The Ruffin Series in Business Ethics:159-164.No categories
- A Justification for My Group of Twelve.Daniel R. Gilbert -1992 -The Ruffin Series in Business Ethics:68-73.No categories
- Persons, Projects, Contracts, and Self-Constraint.Daniel R. Gilbert -1992 -The Ruffin Series in Business Ethics:139-144.
- Terms of Comparison in Twilight.Daniel R. Gilbert -1992 -The Ruffin Series in Business Ethics:149-151.No categories
- Why Have a Strategy?Daniel R. Gilbert -1992 -The Ruffin Series in Business Ethics:57-68.No categories
- Patterns of legal mixing in Eritrea : examining the impact of customary law, Islamic law, colonial law, socialist law, and authoritarian revolutionary dogma.Daniel R. Mekonnen -2015 - In Vernon V. Palmer, Muḥammad Yaḥyá Maṭar & Anna Koppel,Mixed legal systems, east and west. Burlington, VT, USA: Ashgate.Export citation
Bookmark - A Typology of Conceptions of the Good.Daniel R. Denicola -1978 -Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 59 (1):38.No categoriesExport citation Bookmark
- Virtue and the Need for Heroes.Daniel R. DeNicola -forthcoming -Philosophy of Education.
- A Comparative Critique About the Interrelationship Assumption.Daniel R. Gilbert -1992 -The Ruffin Series in Business Ethics:155-159.No categories
- A Justification for Strategy Through Process.Daniel R. Gilbert -1992 -The Ruffin Series in Business Ethics:96-116.
- Summary and Implications.Daniel R. Gilbert -1992 -The Ruffin Series in Business Ethics:23-28.No categories
- The Concept of Strategy According to Strategy & Justice.Daniel R. Gilbert -1992 -The Ruffin Series in Business Ethics:144-145.No categories
- Nietzsche as Cultural Physician.Daniel R. Ahern -1995 - Pennsylvania State University Press.From Nietzsche's early writings to those marking the end of his intellectual life, the dynamics of what he called "physiology" permeate virtually every facet of his philosophical enterprise. In the following investigation, these dynamics are explored as an interpretive key to not only the dominant themes but also the philosophical motive underlying Nietzsche's philosophy. This motive is described in terms of his diagnosis and attempted cure for the disease of nihilism. In this we maintain that Nietzsche's foremost philosophical task is (...) that of a cultural physician. ;In pursuit of this theme, Nietzsche's "clinical standpoint" is explored and applied with regard to Socrates and Jesus Christ as two case studies in decadence. These two "cases" are a simultaneous physiological investigation into both the ancient Greek and Hebrew cultures. ;This investigation concludes with a detailed analysis of the physiological significance of the Revaluation of all Values, Eternal Recurrence, the Overman and Dionysus as integral to curing the sickness of nihilism. (shrink)
- Expressive-Assertivism: A Dual-Use Solution to the Moral Problem.Daniel R. Boisvert -2003 - Dissertation, University of FloridaThis dissertation argues for a metaethical theory I call "Expressive-Assertivism." Expressive-Assertivism is a distinctive, substantial refinement of dual-use metaethical theories traditionally associated with R. M. Hare, C. L. Stevenson, and, more recently, with David Copp. If true, Expressive-Assertivism clarifies, resolves, or dissolves---without, in turn, raising additional difficulties---a number of philosophical problems, including what Michael Smith calls "The Moral Problem," which many consider to be the central organizing problem in contemporary metaethics. The following are the three most important features of Expressive-Assertivism. (...) ;1. The central tenet. The proper, literal use of an ethical sentence, such as 'Donating to charity is right', is the performance of a direct expressive illocutionary act and a direct assertive illocutionary act. Recognizing that ethical sentences can be used to both directly express a speaker's attitude and directly assert something about the world captures what is intuitively compelling about "expressivist" theories---namely, that there is some strong connection between a speaker's sincere moral utterance and his or her motivations to act---and what is intuitively compelling about "descriptivist" theories---namely, that moral utterances appear to have descriptive or cognitive content and, therefore, are truth-evaluable. The Central Tenet is the feature of Expressive-Assertivism that dissolves The Moral Problem. ;2. The generality principle. The proper, literal use of an ethical sentence directly expresses an attitude, not toward the subject of the sentence, but toward things of a more general kind, namely, things that have the property picked out by the ethical predicate . ;3. The extensionality principle. A speaker directly expresses an attitude toward things that have the property picked out by an ethical predicate whenever that predicate appears in any extensional context. Together, the Extensionality and Generality Principles shield Expressive-Assertivism from many objections to traditional expressivist theories, including "The Embedding Objection," which many consider to be the most difficult problem faced by expressivists. (shrink)Export citation Bookmark
- The purview of state-sponsored violence : law enforcement, just war, and the ethics of limited force.Daniel R. Brunstetter -2018 - In Daniel R. Brunstetter & Jean-Vincent Holeindre,The ethics of war and peace revisited: moral challenges in an era of contested and fragmented sovereignty. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
- Conclusion : towards the future of the ethics of war and peace.Daniel R. Brunstetter &Jean-Vincent Holeindre -2018 - In Daniel R. Brunstetter & Jean-Vincent Holeindre,The ethics of war and peace revisited: moral challenges in an era of contested and fragmented sovereignty. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Export citation Bookmark
- Just War Thinkers Revisited: Heretics, Humanists, and Radicals.Daniel R. Brunstetter &Cian O'Driscoll (eds.) -2025 - New York: Routledge.This book comprises essays that focus on a range of thinkers that challenge the boundaries of the just war tradition. The ethics of war scholarship has become a rigid and highly disciplined activity, closely associated with a very particular canon of thinkers. This volume moves beyond this by presenting thinkers not typically regarded as part of that canon, but who have interesting and potentially important things to say about the ethics of war. The book presents twenty profile essays on an (...) eclectic cast of heretics, humanists, and radicals, from Epictetus to Rosa Luxemburg to Frantz Fanon and Judith Butler. The book asks whether there is a good reason for the marginalisation of these thinkers and what ethics of war scholars might benefit from engaging with them. Some of these thinkers engage directly with-to augment or criticise-the just war tradition, while others contribute to military thinking across the ages and push the boundaries of what was acceptable in war. Many proffer alternative moral frameworks regarding the legitimacy of political violence. The present volume thus invites scholars to reconsider the ethics of war in a way that challenges the standard delineation between just war theory, realism, and pacifism, and to reflect on how those positions might inform our own approach to these matters. This book will be of much interest to students of just war theory, ethics of war, war studies and International Relations. (shrink)
- The Twilight of Other Management Concepts.Daniel R. Gilbert -1992 -The Ruffin Series in Business Ethics:180-181.
- Persons, Projects, and Enduring Relationships.Daniel R. Gilbert -1992 -The Ruffin Series in Business Ethics:134-139.
- A Comparative Critique About the Human Decision Assumption.Daniel R. Gilbert -1992 -The Ruffin Series in Business Ethics:151-154.
- Autonomy, Persons, and Justice.Daniel R. Gilbert -1992 -The Ruffin Series in Business Ethics:119-125.
- New Waves in Metaethics: Naturalist Realism, Naturalist Antirealism and Divine Commands.Daniel R. Kern -unknownThis dissertation is an investigation into the ground of moral objectivity. My preliminary claim is that in order to be objective, moral properties must be real properties. The following question is, what kind of properties are moral properties? A number of recent philosophers have argued that moral properties are natural properties. ''Natural" in this context means " open to investigation and discovery by the senses or by empirical science." The natural properties proposed in the recent literature are connected to the (...) property of human well-being. The main project of my dissertation is to show that natural properties are not adequate as the foundation for moral objectivity, because there is no necessary connection between any natural properties and moral properties. Another answer to the question of what kind of properties moral properties are is that they are supernatural properties. "Supernatural" in this context means "not open to investigation and discovery by the senses, or by empirical science." It is my argument that a singular supernatural being who created the world and has particular ideas about what sorts of people/actions/states of affairs are good and bad or right and wrong is the only sufficient ground for moral objectivity. Given such a being, moral properties will be real and objective. They will also be moral properties, since the originator of these properties confers value on them. Using and expanding on work in Divine Command Theory, especially that of Robert M. Adams, my original contribution to this discussion is to propose that moral properties are relational properties. The relationship is between persons, actions, states of affairs, etc., in the physical world, and the ideas, desires, character, or commands of the supernatural being. An important limitation of my dissertation project is that I do not consider any practical issues such as "How do we know whether God exists?", "How would God communicate the content of morality to us?", or "What is God like?" These are important and worthwhile questions, but are not a part of my present investigation. (shrink)No categories
- Associations Between Aerobic Fitness and Cognitive Control in Adolescents.Daniel R. Westfall,Anne K. Gejl,Jakob Tarp,Niels Wedderkopp,Arthur F. Kramer,Charles H. Hillman &Anna Bugge -2018 -Frontiers in Psychology 9.
- Social versus reproductive success: The central theoretical problem of human sociobiology.Daniel R. Vining -1986 -Behavioral and Brain Sciences 9 (1):167-187.The fundamental postulate of sociobiology is that individuals exploit favorable environments to increase their genetic representation in the next generation. The data on fertility differentials among contemporary humans are not cotvietent with this postulate. Given the importance ofHomo sapiensas an animal species in the natural world today, these data constitute particularly challenging and interesting problem for both human sociobiology and sociobiology as a whole.The first part of this paper reviews the evidence showing an inverse relationship between reproductive fitness and “endowment” (...) (i.e. wealth, success, and measured aptitudes) in contemporary, urbanized societies. It is shown that a positive relationship is observed only for those cohorts who bore their children during a unique period of rising fertility, 1935–1960, and that these cohorts are most often cited by sociobiologists as supporting the central postulate of sociobiology. Cohorts preceding and following these show the characteristic inverse relationship between endowment and fertility. The second section reviews the existing so-ciobiological models of this inverse relationship, namely, those of Barkow, Burley, and Irons, as well as more informal responses among sociobiologists to the persistent violation of sociobiology's central postulate, such as those of Alexander and Dawkins. The third section asks whether the goals of sociobiology, given the violation of its fundamental postulate by contemporary human societies, might not be better thought of as applied rather than descriptive, with respect to these societies. A proper answer to this question begins with the measurement of the pace and direction of natural selection within modern human populations, as compared to other sources of change. The vast preponderance of the shifts in human trait distributions, including the IQ distribution, appears to be due to environmental rather than genetic change. However, there remains the question of just how elastic these distributions are in the absence of reinforcing genetic change. (shrink)
- Entropy and information in evolving biological systems.Daniel R. Brooks,John Collier,Brian A. Maurer,Jonathan D. H. Smith &E. O. Wiley -1989 -Biology and Philosophy 4 (4):407-432.Integrating concepts of maintenance and of origins is essential to explaining biological diversity. The unified theory of evolution attempts to find a common theme linking production rules inherent in biological systems, explaining the origin of biological order as a manifestation of the flow of energy and the flow of information on various spatial and temporal scales, with the recognition that natural selection is an evolutionarily relevant process. Biological systems persist in space and time by transfor ming energy from one state (...) to another in a manner that generates structures which allows the system to continue to persist. Two classes of energetic transformations allow this; heat-generating transformations, resulting in a net loss of energy from the system, and conservative transformations, changing unusable energy into states that can be stored and used subsequently. All conservative transformations in biological systems are coupled with heat-generating transformations; hence, inherent biological production, or genealogical proesses, is positively entropic. There is a self-organizing phenomenology common to genealogical phenomena, which imparts an arrow of time to biological systems. Natural selection, which by itself is time-reversible, contributes to the organization of the self-organized genealogical trajectories. The interplay of genealogical (diversity-promoting) and selective (diversity-limiting) processes produces biological order to which the primary contribution is genealogical history. Dynamic changes occuring on times scales shorter than speciation rates are microevolutionary; those occuring on time scales longer than speciation rates are macroevolutionary. Macroevolutionary processes are neither redicible to, nor autonomous from, microevolutionary processes. (shrink)
- Postracial Fantasies and the Reproduction of Scientific Racism.Daniel R. Morrison &Patrick Ryan Grzanka -2017 -American Journal of Bioethics 17 (9):65-67.
- Asking More of Our Metaphors: Narrative Strategies to End the “War on Alzheimer's” and Humanize Cognitive Aging.Daniel R. George,Erin R. Whitehouse &Peter J. Whitehouse -2016 -American Journal of Bioethics 16 (10):22-24.In all facets of our lives, humans construct meaning to understand their place in the world and their relationships to one another and to broader environments. Within this semantic web, words, stor...
- Economic Efficiency, Growth, and the Catholic Vision of Economic Justice.Daniel R. Fairchild -2003 -Logos: A Journal of Catholic Thought and Culture 6 (1):100-119.
- Pursuing ethics in modern business ethics education.Daniel R. Leclair -2005 - In Sheb L. True, Linda Ferrell & O. C. Ferrell,Fulfilling our obligation: perspectives on teaching business ethics. Kennesaw, GA: Kennesaw State University.Export citation Bookmark
- “Forgiveness is forgiveness:” Kierkegaard’s Spiritual Acoustics.Daniel R. Esparza -2023 -Kierkegaard Studies Yearbook 28 (1):191-214.Kierkegaard’s distinction of chatter from silence gives forgiveness a linguistic spin. How can forgiveness be spoken? Is forgiveness something to be said and heard? Is saying it aloud saying too much, or too little? What is said when (and if) forgiveness is said? Should forgiveness be chatted away, or reserved in silence? For Kierkegaard, the answer(s) is (are) neither/nor: forgiveness can only be said indirectly, kept (almost) indistinguishable from resentment or indifference, as if discarded in the face of offense—if it (...) is to happen. (shrink)No categories
- Earth – A Place for Indigenous Solutions.Daniel R. Wildcat -2022 - In Lee C. McIntyre, Nancy Arden McHugh & Ian Olasov,A companion to public philosophy. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 95–105.Public philosophy distinguishes itself from other philosophical undertakings by either addressing public problems, i.e. those with broad social consequence, or doing the work of philosophy in a public setting beyond the confines of a purely academic environment. The ironic and darkly absurd character of the defining features of civilization and progress – realities Indigenous Peoples have confronted with devastating consequences for centuries – is the way in which both generate tremendous unhappiness and destruction. The living historical character of our cultures (...) is captured in the power plus place equals personality axiom that Deloria formulated. The modus operandi of Indigenous solutions not only addresses the “know‐how” but the moral “should we” dimensions of proposed solutions. Most of humankind talks about resources because the worldview guiding the powerful economic and political interests thinks in those terms about our relatives. (shrink)No categories
- Nietzsche and the vicious circle.Daniel R. White -2003 -The European Legacy 8 (5):635-639.'The greatest book of philosophy I have ever read, on a par with Nietzsche himself.' Michel Foucault.
- Transfer and expertise.Daniel R. Kimball &Keith J. Holyoak -2000 - In Endel Tulving,The Oxford Handbook of Memory. Oxford University Press. pp. 109--122.
- Francis Bacon.Daniel R. Coquillette -1992 - Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.This is the first modern book to describe Francis Bacon's jurisprudence. He has long been famous as a scientist, philosopher, politician and literary giant, but his career as one of England's greatest lawyers and jurists has been largely overlooked. Bacon's major contribution to Anglo-American jurisprudence is presented in such a way as to be suitable to specialists and non-specialists alike. The purpose is to restore Bacon to his rightful place as England's first true critical and analytical jurist, and to describe (...) how his legal thought related to his other great intellectual achievements. (shrink)
- The Social Folk Theorist: Insights from Social and Cultural Psychology on the.Daniel R. Ames,Eric D. Knowles,Michael W. Morris,Charles W. Kalish,Andrea D. Rosati &Alison Gopnik -2001 - In Bertram F. Malle, Louis J. Moses & Dare A. Baldwin,Intentions and Intentionality: Foundations of Social Cognition. MIT Press.
- Nonequilibrium thermodynamics and different axioms of evolution.Daniel R. Brooks &Richard T. O'Grady -1986 -Acta Biotheoretica 35 (1-2):77-106.Proponents of two axioms of biological evolutionary theory have attempted to find justification by reference to nonequilibrium thermodynamics. One states that biological systems and their evolutionary diversification are physically improbable states and transitions, resulting from a selective process; the other asserts that there is an historically constrained inherent directionality in evolutionary dynamics, independent of natural selection, which exerts a self-organizing influence. The first, the Axiom of Improbability, is shown to be nonhistorical and thus, for a theory of change through time, (...) acausal. Its perception of the improbability of living states is at least partially an artifact of closed system thinking. The second, the Axiom of Historically Determined Inherent Directionality, is supported evidentially and has an explicit historical component. Historically constrained dynamic populations are inherently nonequilibrium systems. It is argued that living, evolving systems, when considered to be historically constrained nonequilibrium systems, do not appear improbable at all. Thus, the two axioms are not compatible. Instead, the Axiom of Improbability is considered to result from an unjustified attempt to extend the contingent proximal actions of natural selection into the area of historical, causal explanations. It is thus denied axiomatic status, and the effects of natural selection are subsumed as an additional level of constraint in an evolutionary theory derived from the Axiom of Historically Determined Inherent Directionality. (shrink)
- 5. David Foster Wallace as American Hedgehog.Daniel R. Kelly -2015 - In Steven M. Cahn & Maureen Eckert,Freedom and the Self: Essays on the Philosophy of David Foster Wallace. New York: Columbia University Press. pp. 109-132.No categories
- (1 other version)A formal definition of the set of the logical connectors of pragmatics.Daniel R. Vanderveken -1976 -Mathematical Logic Quarterly 22 (1):513-516.
- The Leśniewski-Curry theory of syntactical categories and the categorially open functors.Daniel R. Vanderveken -1976 -Studia Logica 35 (2):191-201.
- Problems with the Darwinian hypothesis.Daniel R. Vining -1993 -Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (2):310-310.
- Relative fitness is enough.Daniel R. Vining -1987 -Behavioral and Brain Sciences 10 (4):789.
- The fSAM model of false recall.Daniel R. Kimball,Troy A. Smith &Michael J. Kahana -2007 -Psychological Review 114 (4):954-993.
- Selective attention and dimensional learning: A logical analysis of two-stage attention theories.Daniel R. Anderson,Deborah G. Kemler &Bryan E. Shepp -1973 -Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 2 (5):273-275.
- Understanding ignorance: the surprising impact of what we don't know.Daniel R. DeNicola -2017 - Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.Ignorance is trending. Politicians boast, "I'm not a scientist." Angry citizens object to a proposed state motto because it is in Latin, and "This is America, not Mexico or Latin America." Lack of experience, not expertise, becomes a credential. Fake news and repeated falsehoods are accepted and shape firm belief. Ignorance about American government and history is so alarming that the ideal of an informed citizenry now seems quaint. Conspiracy theories and false knowledge thrive. This may be the Information Age, (...) but we do not seem to be well informed. In this book, philosopherDaniel DeNicola explores ignorance -- its abundance, its endurance, and its consequences. (shrink)
- Better data with fewer participants and trials: improving experiment efficiency with adaptive design optimization.Daniel R. Cavagnaro,J. I. Myung,M. A. Pitt &Y. Tang -2009 - In N. A. Taatgen & H. van Rijn,Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.Export citation Bookmark
- Tables for Students of Philosophy: A Supplement to Philosophical Discussion.Daniel R. Chadwick -2002 - Upa.Organized by major philosophical subjects, Tables for Students of Philosophy offers a broad view of a challenging field of study for the undergraduate student. Chadwick presents and explains various philosophical paradigms and movements using brief descriptions and diagrams.No categories
- Pluralities of place: A user's guide to place concepts, theories, and philosophies in natural resource management.Daniel R. Williams -2008 - In Linda Everett Kruger, Troy Elizabeth Hall & Maria C. Stiefel,Understanding Concepts of Place in Recreation Research and Management. U.S. Dept. Of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. pp. 7--30.
- An Extraordinary Concept in the Ordinary Service of Management.Daniel R. Gilbert -2001 -Business Ethics Quarterly 11 (1):1-9.The papers by Mele, Randels, and Schrag call attention to the proper work that the concept of loyalty can perform. All threeauthors argue that loyalty is not taken seriously enough in modern corporations. As Mele, Randels, and Schrag independently ascribespecial status to the concept of loyalty, their analyses converge along numerous conceptual margins. Along these margins, a singularconception of loyalty comes into focus. Along these margins, we can see Simultaneously why each author assigns extraordinary status to loyalty and why, ironically, (...) each turns the special concept of loyalty over to the service of conventional management thinking. Mele,Randels, and Schrag leave it for us to ponder whether this ironic twist is unique to the concept of loyalty. (shrink)
| 1 — 50 / 986 |
Off-campus access
Using PhilPapers from home?
Create an account to enable off-campus access through your institution's proxy server or OpenAthens.
Monitor this page
Be alerted of all new items appearing on this page. Choose how you want to monitor it:
 Email |  RSS feed |
Editorial team
General Editors:
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Area Editors:
David Bourget
Gwen Bradford
Berit Brogaard
Margaret Cameron
David Chalmers
James Chase
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Esa Diaz-Leon
Barry Hallen
Hans Halvorson
Jonathan Ichikawa
Monte Johnson
Michelle Kosch
Øystein Linnebo
Paul Livingston
Brandon Look
Manolo Martínez
Matthew McGrath
Michiru Nagatsu
Susana Nuccetelli
Giuseppe Primiero
Jack Alan Reynolds
Darrell P. Rowbottom
Aleksandra Samonek
Constantine Sandis
Howard Sankey
Jonathan Schaffer
Thomas Senor
Daniel Star
Jussi Suikkanen
Aness Kim Webster
Other editors
Contact us
Learn more about PhilPapers
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Area Editors:
David Bourget
Gwen Bradford
Berit Brogaard
Margaret Cameron
David Chalmers
James Chase
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Esa Diaz-Leon
Barry Hallen
Hans Halvorson
Jonathan Ichikawa
Monte Johnson
Michelle Kosch
Øystein Linnebo
Paul Livingston
Brandon Look
Manolo Martínez
Matthew McGrath
Michiru Nagatsu
Susana Nuccetelli
Giuseppe Primiero
Jack Alan Reynolds
Darrell P. Rowbottom
Aleksandra Samonek
Constantine Sandis
Howard Sankey
Jonathan Schaffer
Thomas Senor
Daniel Star
Jussi Suikkanen
Aness Kim Webster
Other editors
Contact us
Learn more about PhilPapers
Home |New books and articles |Bibliographies |Philosophy journals |About PhilPapers |API |Contact us |Code of conduct
PhilPapers logo byAndrea Andrews andMeghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see ourterms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications).Use of this site is subject toterms & conditions.
All rights reserved byThe PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-5b9ff6f457-q9rxf uwo