Results for 'D. Ongur'
953 found
Order:
1 filter applied
- Demographic and clinical characteristics associated with a history of bizarre delusions in a cross-diagnostic sample of individuals with psychotic disorders.C. Yuksel,S. Yilmaz,A. Nesbit,G. Carkaxhiu,C. Ravichandran,P. Salvatore,S. Pingali,B. Cohen &D.Ongur -2018 -Asian Journal of Psychiatry 31:82–85.Bizarre delusions are not specific to schizophrenia and can be found in other psychotic disorders. However, to date, there are no studies investigating socio-demographic and clinical characteristics associated with BizD across the psychosis spectrum. In this study 819 subjects with a diagnosis of SZ, schizoaffective disorder and bipolar I disorder were included. Patients with history of BizD and with no BizD were compared with respect to socidemographic and clinical variables, and predictors of BizD were explored. Patients with BizD were less (...) educated, less likely to be married, had higher Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale negative scores and lower Young Mania Rating Scale scores. Younger age, SZ and SZA diagnoses, higher PANSS positive scores, presence of reference delusions, tactile and olfactory hallucinations were predictors. Our results indicate that BizD are associated with higher illness severity, lower functionality and specific set of symptoms. (shrink)
- Religion and the hermeneutics of contemplation.D. Z. Phillips -2001 - New York: Cambridge University Press.Leading philosopher of religion D. Z. Phillips argues that intellectuals need not see their task as being for or against religion, but as one of understanding it. What stands in the way of this task are certain methodological assumptions about what enquiry into religion must be. Beginning with Bernard Williams on Greek gods, Phillips goes on to examine these assumptions in the work of Hume, Feuerbach, Marx, Frazer, Tylor, Marett, Freud, Durkheim, Le;vy-Bruhl, Berger and Winch. The result exposes confusion, but (...) also gives logical space to religious belief without advocating personal acceptance of that belief, and shows how the academic study of religion may return to the contemplative task of doing conceptual justice to the world. Religion and the Hermeneutics of Contemplation extends in important ways D. Z. Phillips' seminal 1976 book Religion Without Explanation. It will be of interest to scholars and students of philosophy, anthropology, sociology and theology. (shrink)
- Religion and Friendly Fire: Examining Assumptions in Contemporary Philosophy of Religion.D. Z. Phillips -2017 - Routledge.In locating friendly fire in contemporary philosophy of religion, D.Z. Phillips shows that more harm can be done to religion by its philosophical defenders than by its philosophical despisers. Friendly fire is the result of an uncritical acceptance of empiricism, and Phillips argues that we need to examine critically the claims that individual consciousness is the necessary starting point from which we have to argue: for the existence of an external world and the reality of God; that God is a (...) person without a body, a pure consciousness; and that to assent to a religious belief is essentially to assign a truth value to a proposition independent of any confessional context. When these products of friendly fire are avoided, we arrive at a new understanding of belief, trust and the soul, and refuse to say more or less than we know about the realities of human life in the service of religious apologetics. (shrink)
- Labirinty istorii: V dvukh tomakh.D. N. Abdullaeva -2013 - Khudzhand: Khuroson.
- Sitiyam sahita Buddhaprajñāpti saṅgrahaya.D. H. S. Abhayaratna -1969Export citation
Bookmark - Sull'autore degli scoli mitologici alle orazioni di Gregorio di Nazianzo.D. Accorinti -1990 -Byzantion 60:5-24.No categoriesExport citation Bookmark
- Unifying the Philosophy of Truth.D. Achourioti,H. Galinon &J. Martinez (eds.) -2015 - Springer.Export citation Bookmark
- Ideals 2000: Values for the Twentyfirst Century.D. H. O. Adams -1993No categories
- Elastic moduli and internal friction of nanocrystalline Pd and PdSi as a function of temperature.D. S. Agosta,R. G. Leisure,K. Foster,J. Markmann &J. J. Adams -2008 -Philosophical Magazine 88 (6):949-958.No categories
- The relationship between unethical behavior and the dimensions of the ethical climate questionnaire.D. K. Peterson -2002 -Journal of Business Ethics 41 (4):313 - 326.This study examined the relationship between unethical employee behavior and the dimensions of the Ethical Climate Questionnaire (ECQ). In order to explore the relationship between the dimensions of the ECQ and unethical behavior, the factor structure of five previously identified empirical models and the hypothesized nine-dimension model for the ECQ was tested with a confirmatory factor analysis. The analysis revealed that the hypothesized nine-dimension model provided as good or even better fit to the data than the five empirically derived models. (...) Therefore, the nine-dimensional model was used to examine the criterion-related validity of the ECQ. The results demonstrated that the nine ethical climate dimensions were correlated with some of the unethical behaviors examined in this study, but not others. However, the results clearly demonstrated that most of the ethical climate dimensions were significantly related to an aggregate measure of unethical behavior. It was suggested that these results might account for the differences in previous studies on the criterion-related validity of the ECQ. The results also replicated a previous report that the association between unethical behavior and ethical climate is stronger in organizations that do not have a code of ethics. Finally, a difference was observed in the ethical climates for organizations with a code of ethics and organizations without a code of ethics. (shrink)
- The Concept of Representation.D. A. Lloyd Thomas -1969 -Philosophical Quarterly 19 (75):186-187.No categories
- Postpositivism and Educational Research.D. C. Phillips &Nicholas C. Burbules -2001 -British Journal of Educational Studies 49 (1):109-111.
- Prawitz’s Epistemic Grounding: An Investigation into the Power of Deduction.Antonio Piccolomini D’Aragona -2023 - Springer Verlag.This book presents an in-depth and critical reconstruction of Prawitz’s epistemic grounding, and discusses it within the broader field of proof-theoretic semantics. The theory of grounds is also provided with a formal framework, through which several relevant results are proved. Investigating Prawitz’s theory of grounds, this work answers one of the most fundamental questions in logic: why and how do some inferences have the epistemic power to compel us to accept their conclusion, if we have accepted their premises? Prawitz proposes (...) an innovative description of inferential acts, as applications of constructive operations on grounds for the premises, yielding a ground for the conclusion. The book is divided into three parts. In the first, the author discusses the reasons that have led Prawitz to abandon his previous semantics of valid arguments and proofs. The second part presents Prawitz’s grounding as found in his ground-theoretic papers. Finally, in the third part, a formal apparatus is developed, consisting of a class of languages whose terms are equipped with denotation functions associating them to operations and grounds, as well as of a class of systems where important properties of the terms can be proved. (shrink)
- (1 other version)The Concept of Prayer.D. Z. Phillips -1965 - Routledge.Many contemporary philosophers assume that, before one can discuss prayer, the question of whether there is a God or not must be settled. In this title, first published in 1965, D. Z. Phillips argues that to understand prayer is to understand what is meant by the reality of God. Beginning by placing the problem of prayer within a philosophical context, Phillips goes on to discuss such topics as prayer and the concept of talking, prayer and dependence, superstition and the concept (...) of community. This is a fascinating reissue that will be of particular value to students with an interest in the philosophy of religion, prayer and religious studies more generally. (shrink)No categories
- Moral Practices.D. Z. Phillips &H. O. Mounce -1970 -Philosophy 46 (176):179-181.No categories
- On really believing.D. Z. Phillips -1993 - In Dewi Zephaniah Phillips,Wittgenstein and religion. New York, N.Y.: St. Martin's Press. pp. 33-55.
- Organicism in the Late Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries.D. C. Phillips -1907 - Journal of the History of Ideas.No categories
- (2 other versions)The Concept of Prayer.D. Z. Phillips -1965 -Philosophy 42 (159):96-98.No categories
- (1 other version)Ethics, Value and Reality.D. Z. Phillips,Aurel Kolnai,Bernard Williams &David Wiggins -1978 -Philosophical Quarterly 28 (112):277.No categories
- Moral Practices.D. Z. Phillips -1970 - New York,: Routledge. Edited by H. O. Mounce.First published in 2003. Routledge is an imprint of Taylor & Francis, an informa company.
- III—Does it Pay to be Good?D. Z. Phillips -1965 -Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 65 (1):45-60.D. Z. Phillips; III—Does it Pay to be Good?, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Volume 65, Issue 1, 1 June 1965, Pages 45–60, https://doi.org/10.1093/aris.
- (1 other version)Philosophy's Cool Place.D. Z. Phillips -2001 -Mind 110 (437):257-261.No categories
- (1 other version)The Religious Significance of Atheism.D. Z. Phillips,Alasdair MacIntyre &Paul Ricoeur -1971 -Philosophical Quarterly 21 (82):93.
- The contested nature of empirical educational research (and why philosophy of education offers little help).D. C. Phillips -2005 -Journal of Philosophy of Education 39 (4):577–597.This paper suggests that empirical educational research has not, on the whole, been treated well by philosophers of education. A variety of criticisms have been offered, ranging from triviality, conceptual confusion and the impossibility of empirically studying normative processes. Furthermore, many of those who criticise, or dismiss, empirical research do so without subjecting any specific examples to careful scholarly scrutiny. It is suggested that both philosophy of education, and the empirical research enterprise, stand to profit if philosophers pay more attention (...) to real cases—and this attention is especially important at present, when research funding is being based on spurious scientistic criteria such as the use of ‘gold standard’ randomised experimental research designs. (shrink)
- William Hasker’s avoidance of the problems of evil and God.D. Z. Phillips -2007 -International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 62 (1):33-42.Our Book Review Editor, James Keller, invited William Hasker to write a review of the Book by D. Z. Phillips, "The Problem of Evil and the Problem of God" and then in consultation with the Editor-in-Chief invited Phillips to respond. Aware of both their respect for each other and their philosophical differences we planned that Hasker's review and Phillips' response would appear in the same issue of the "International Journal for Philosophy of Religion." Unfortunately that was not to be. Dewi, (...) as he was known to his many friends throughout the world, collapsed at his desk on 25 July, 2006 in the library of his beloved University of Wales, Swansea. Although we were not able to have the review and response appear in the same issue as we had all planned, we are now printing his response to Hasker's review, "D. Z. Phillips's Problems with Evil and with God," which appeared in IJPR, Vol. 61,3. Dewi had completed the review and thanks to the efforts of Helen Baldwin who prepared the manuscript and Dewi's wife, Monica, and family we are able to print it here. Since Dewi was responding to an earlier version of Hasker's review, a few minor editorial changes have been made. Dewi's death is a great loss to the philosophical community and a deep personal loss to his family and friends, but I am confident that he would be pleassed to have this response appear. He might even have a story to tell, a comment that those who knew him well will fully understand. Eugene Thomas Long. (shrink)
- (3 other versions)Religion without Explanation.D. Z. Phillips -1978 -Philosophy 53 (204):274-275.No categories
- (2 other versions)Faith after Foundationalism.D. Z. Phillips -1988 -Philosophy 64 (249):419-421.No categories
- Dealing “competently with the serious issues of the day”: How Dewey (and popper) failed.D. C. Phillips -2012 -Educational Theory 62 (2):125-142.In Reconstruction in Philosophy, John Dewey issued an eloquent call for contemporary philosophy to become more relevant to the pressing problems facing society. Historically, the philosophy of a period had been appropriate to social conditions, but despite the vast changes in the contemporary world and the complex challenges confronting it philosophy had remained ossified. Karl Popper also was dissatisfied with contemporary philosophy, which he regarded as too often focusing upon “minute” problems. Both Dewey and Popper, however, were optimistic that the (...) situation could be turned around. In this essay D.C. Phillips argues that the resources they mustered give no basis for this optimism; in particular, Phillips emphasizes that philosophy cannot have traction with closed‐minded or fanatical individuals. Dewey passed over cases where his ideas about democratic processes and free intellectual exchange faced intractable difficulties, according to Phillips, and he further suggests that Popper “waffled” over the so‐called “myth of the framework.”. (shrink)
- Philosophy of education.D. C. Phillips -2008 -Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
- Ādiśaṅkarācārya: vyaktitvaṃ-tatvaṃ.Rāvipūḍi Veṅkaṭādri -1991 - Nāgaṇḍla, Prakāśaṃ Jillā: Kavirājāśramaṃ.Critique of Śaṅkarācārya, religious teacher and exponent of the Advaita philosophy; rationalist viewpoint.Export citation Bookmark
- Not in front of the children: Children and the heterogeneity of morals.D. Z. Phillips -1980 -Journal of Philosophy of Education 14 (1):73–75.D Z Phillips; Not in Front of the Children: children and the heterogeneity of morals, Journal of Philosophy of Education, Volume 14, Issue 1, 30 May 2006, Pages.
- Propositions, Pictures and Practices.D. Z. Phillips -2002 -Ars Disputandi 2:164-171.
- Remorse without repudiation.D. Z. Phillips -1967 -Analysis 28 (1):18.
- James, Dewey, and the Reflex Arc.D. C. Phillips -1971 -Journal of the History of Ideas 32 (4):555.
- Organicism in the Late Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries.D. C. Phillips -1970 -Journal of the History of Ideas 31 (3):413.
- Wittgensteinianism: Logic, Reality and God.D. Z. Phillips -2005 - In William J. Wainwright,The Oxford handbook of philosophy of religion. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 447--71.Five reasons are given for why Wittgensteinianism, though a major movement in philosophy of religion, has never been a dominant one. The remainder of the chapter is divided as follows: - I: The influence of Descartes’ Legacy. - II: Philosophy of Religion’s epistemological inheritance as seen in Reformed epistemology and the influence of Thomas Reid, and in neo-Kantianism. - III: The return from metaphysical reality in Wittgenstein. - IV: Difficulties in the metaphysical notion of God: as being itself or pure (...) consciousness. - V: The importance of ordinary certitudes in Wittgenstein’s On Certainty. - VI: The sense of God’s “otherness” from the world. - VII: Religion and contemplative philosophy. (shrink)
- Empirical educational research : charting philosophical disagreements in an undisciplined field.D. C. Phillips -2009 - In Harvey Siegel,The Oxford handbook of philosophy of education. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Abstraction, addition, separation dans la philosophie d'Aristote.M. D. Philippe -1948 -Revue Thomiste 48:461-479.No categories
- Interventions in Ethics.D. Z. Phillips -1993 -Philosophy 68 (266):570-572.No categories
- Knowledge and Social Imagery.D. E. B. Pollard -1976 -Philosophical Studies (Dublin) 25:365-367.
- Religion and friendly fire.D. Z. Phillips -2006 -Ars Disputandi 6:1566-5399.
- Religion and Morality (London: Macmillan 1996; New York: St. Martin's Press, 1996).D. Z. Phillips (ed.) -1996 - New York: Macmillan and St. Martin's.Reflection on religion inevitably involves consideration of its relation to morality. When great evil is done to human beings, we may feel that something absolute has been violated. Can that sense, which is related to gratitude for existence, be expressed without religious concepts? Can we express central religious concerns, such as losing the self, while abandoning any religious metaphysic? Is moral obligation itself dependent on divine commands if it is to be objective, or is morality not only independent of religion, (...) but its accuser if God is said to allow horrendous evils? In any case, what happens to the absolute claims of religion in what is, undeniably, a morally pluralistic world? These are the central questions discussed by philosophers of religion and moral philosophers in this collection. They do so in ways which bring new aspects to bear on these traditional issues. (shrink)
- In search of the moral `must': Mrs foot's fugitive thought.D. Z. Phillips -1977 -Philosophical Quarterly 27 (107):140-157.
- Morality: Religious and Secular.D. Z. Phillips &Basil Mitchell -1981 -Philosophical Quarterly 31 (123):179.
- Religion and Understanding.D. Z. Phillips -1967 -Philosophy 43 (165):287-287.No categories
- The distinguishing features of forms of knowledge.D. C. Phillips -1971 -Educational Philosophy and Theory 3 (2):27–35.
- Philosophy, theology, and the reality of God.D. Z. Phillips -1963 -Philosophical Quarterly 13 (53):344-350.No categories
- (1 other version)Through a Darkening Glass, Philosophy, Literature and Cultural Change.D. Z. Phillips -1983 -Religious Studies 19 (3):426-428.
- Philosophy of religion in the 21st century.D. Z. Phillips &Timothy Tessin (eds.) -2001 - New York: Palgrave.This book offers the rare opportunity to assess, within a single volume, the leading schools of thought in the contemporary philosophy of religion. With contributions by well-known exponents of each school, the book is an ideal text for assessing the deep proximities and divisions which characterize contemporary philosophy of religion. The schools of thought represented include philosophical theism, Reformed epistemology, Wittgensteinianism, Postmodernism, Critical Theory, and Process Thought.
- Directive Teaching, Indoctrination, and the Values Education of Children.D. C. Phillips -1989 -Social Theory and Practice 15 (3):339-353.
| 1 — 50 / 953 |
Off-campus access
Using PhilPapers from home?
Create an account to enable off-campus access through your institution's proxy server or OpenAthens.
Monitor this page
Be alerted of all new items appearing on this page. Choose how you want to monitor it:
 Email |  RSS feed |
Editorial team
General Editors:
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Area Editors:
David Bourget
Gwen Bradford
Berit Brogaard
Margaret Cameron
David Chalmers
James Chase
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Esa Diaz-Leon
Barry Hallen
Hans Halvorson
Jonathan Ichikawa
Monte Johnson
Michelle Kosch
Øystein Linnebo
Paul Livingston
Brandon Look
Manolo Martínez
Matthew McGrath
Michiru Nagatsu
Susana Nuccetelli
Giuseppe Primiero
Jack Alan Reynolds
Darrell P. Rowbottom
Aleksandra Samonek
Constantine Sandis
Howard Sankey
Jonathan Schaffer
Thomas Senor
Daniel Star
Jussi Suikkanen
Aness Kim Webster
Other editors
Contact us
Learn more about PhilPapers
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Area Editors:
David Bourget
Gwen Bradford
Berit Brogaard
Margaret Cameron
David Chalmers
James Chase
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Esa Diaz-Leon
Barry Hallen
Hans Halvorson
Jonathan Ichikawa
Monte Johnson
Michelle Kosch
Øystein Linnebo
Paul Livingston
Brandon Look
Manolo Martínez
Matthew McGrath
Michiru Nagatsu
Susana Nuccetelli
Giuseppe Primiero
Jack Alan Reynolds
Darrell P. Rowbottom
Aleksandra Samonek
Constantine Sandis
Howard Sankey
Jonathan Schaffer
Thomas Senor
Daniel Star
Jussi Suikkanen
Aness Kim Webster
Other editors
Contact us
Learn more about PhilPapers
Home |New books and articles |Bibliographies |Philosophy journals |About PhilPapers |API |Contact us |Code of conduct
PhilPapers logo byAndrea Andrews andMeghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see ourterms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications).Use of this site is subject toterms & conditions.
All rights reserved byThe PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-5b9ff6f457-db4gm uwo