Movatterモバイル変換

[0]ホーム
URL:

PhilPapersPhilPeoplePhilArchivePhilEventsPhilJobs

Works by Charles V. Blatz

(view other items matching `Charles V. Blatz`,view all matches )
15 found
Order:

1 filter applied
Disambiguations
Charles V. Blatz [15]Charles Val Blatz [1]
  1.  67
    Accountability and answerability.Charles V. Blatz -1972 -Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 2 (2):101–120.
  2.  37
    The very idea of sustainability.Charles V. Blatz -1992 -Agriculture and Human Values 9 (4):12-28.
    Discussions of the desirability and ethical justifiability of sustainable agriculture are frequently impeded, if not derailed by the variety of meanings attached to the term “sustainable.” This paper suggests a taxonomy of different notions of sustainability distinguishing between agricultural product and process sustainability, in both static and dynamic forms, pursued by reductive (extractive), compensatory, regenerative, and induced homeostasis strategies. The discussion then goes on to argue that ethics demand sustainable agriculture. Finally the paper tries to identify just which types of (...) sustainable agriculture will meet the ethical demands. I conclude with reasons for living sustainably in the present, as opposed to trying to orient agriculture by reference to the rights of future generations. (shrink)
    Direct download(3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  3.  24
    Ethics and agriculture: an anthology on current issues in world context.Charles V. Blatz (ed.) -1991 - Moscow, Idaho: University of Idaho Press.
    Agriculture is changing around the world. The most dramatic of these changes, however, threaten the very ability of humanity to produce the food needed to sustain itself. Although more is now produced on less land and with less human effort, some farming methods deteriorate our resources to such an extent that the productive life of many important agricultural areas can be numbered, not in centuries, but in decades. Although all view this situation with alarm, few agree on practical solutions to (...) it. Social revisionists recommend stringent reform of those political and economic policies that allegedly created the crisis. At the opposite extreme, others adhere to the belief that economic forces, unfettered by unrealistic social and bureaucratic constraints, ought to be allowed to reshape agriculture in a manner most favorable to humanity's long-term well-being. Between these views is a wide range of stands on ethical issues in agricultural production and on the values of rural community life. Ethics and Agriculture is the first comprehensive anthology of multidisciplinary readings on the ethical questions confronting agriculture today. It sets these issues in context with an introduction to the ethical traditions that structure the discussion. (shrink)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  4.  21
    A reply to Harris and Spanier.Charles V. Blatz -1976 -Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 6 (2):261–266.
  5.  35
    Ethical issues in private and public ranch land management and ownership.Charles V. Blatz -1984 -Agriculture and Human Values 1 (4):3-16.
  6.  70
    Transitional Justice and the [Re-]Construction of Critical Agency.Charles V. Blatz -1998 -Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 18 (1):22-43.
  7.  36
    Culture, Judgment, Integration of Attention and Argumentation.Charles V. Blatz -unknown
    Some exchanges of reasons are agonistic. Others work mutually, as in planning and adjusting divergent understanding. Mutual argumentation subconsciously yields judgment that integrates and clarifies a common vision coordinating interrelated lives. It harmonizes agents sharing a space of action and understanding. Pierre Bourdieu held that such thought generates and expresses culture, patterning a logic that reflexively constrains itself. This discussion examines Bourdieu’s views as an analysis of mutual argumentation.
    Direct download(4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8.  31
    Commentary on Carozza.Charles V. Blatz -unknown
    No categories
    Direct download(3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  9.  10
    Commentary on Woods.Charles V. Blatz -unknown
    No categories
    Direct download(3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10.  4
    Studies in ethics: essays.Charles V. Blatz (ed.) -1973 - [Oxford, Eng.]: Blackwell.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11.  36
    The Spirit of Critical Thinking and the Possibility of Cross-Cultural Criticism.Charles V. Blatz -1997 -Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 17 (2):32-52.
  12.  44
    Wide reflective equilibrium and conductive argument.Steven Patterson &Charles V. Blatz -unknown
    In this paper I compare and contrast Rawls’s notion of reflective equilibrium with Wellman‘s notion of conductive argument. In the course of so doing I will address two key questions: Are conduc-tive argument and reflective equilibrium best understood as modes of reasoning or types of argument? and What relationship, if any, is there between them?
    Direct download(3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  13.  58
    Book ReviewsErazim. Kohak, The Green Halo: A Bird’s‐Eye View of Ecological Ethics. Chicago: Open Court, 2000. Pp. xxvi +209. $24.95. [REVIEW]Charles V. Blatz -2003 -Ethics 113 (4):887-891.
  14.  36
    Book ReviewsPaul Thompson,. The Spirit of the Soil: Agriculture and Environmental Ethics. New York: Routledge, 1995. Pp. 196. $52.95 ; $16.95. [REVIEW]Charles V. Blatz -2001 -Ethics 111 (2):443-445.
  15.  65
    Ethics, ecology and development: Styles of ethics and styles of agriculture. [REVIEW]Charles V. Blatz -1992 -Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 5 (1):59-85.
    This paper proposes to test the ethical acceptability of four styles of agricultural resource management: (1) contemporary industrial integrated systems agriculture, (2) modern industrial input dependent agriculture, (3) continuous traditional agriculture and (4) non-continuous (or swidden) traditional agriculture. The test of ethical acceptability is whether or not these styles of agricultural resource management embrace or are even compatible with that pattern of practical reasoning and interaction among ethical agents which we have independent theoretic grounds for preferring. The preferred sorts of (...) practical reasoning and interaction are those which we find operating in ethical theories which are strongly committed to letting the discretion of ethical agents construct what is right for them to do. Thus the discussion distinguishes several different strengths of constructivist ethics relating them to the work of John Rawls, Immanuel Kant and Onora O'Neill. Then it argues for the theoretic preferability of one particular strength of constructivist ethic. The paper winds up by arguing that only traditional continuous agriculture embodies the preferred sort of practical reasoning and interaction among ethical agents. Further, I argue that this is the only style of agriculture which can embody such reasoning and patterns of interaction. Thus, as we consider the role of agriculture in our plans of international development, we have one reason to try to favor traditional continuous agriculture. To do otherwise would ignore the ethical superiority of the practical reasoning and patterns of interaction of traditional agriculturalists. (shrink)
    Direct download(3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
Export
Limit to items.
Filters





Configure languageshere.Sign in to use this feature.

Viewing options


Open Category Editor
Off-campus access
Using PhilPapers from home?

Create an account to enable off-campus access through your institution's proxy server or OpenAthens.

Monitor this page
Be alerted of all new items appearing on this page. Choose how you want to monitor it:

Email RSS feed
Home |New books and articles |Bibliographies |Philosophy journals |About PhilPapers |API |Contact us |Code of conduct

CDPPhiosophy Documentation Center
PhilPapers logo byAndrea Andrews andMeghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see ourterms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications).

Use of this site is subject toterms & conditions.
All rights reserved byThe PhilPapers Foundation

Server: philpapers-web-5b9ff6f457-ljglp uwo
[8]ページ先頭
©2009-2025 Movatter.jp