Results for 'Brian Crowley'
935 found
Order:
1 filter applied
- Members Lunch 7 April 2006@ Sabayon Restaurant.ChristopherCrowley,Ross Watch &Brian Worth -forthcoming -Ethos: Journal of the Society for Psychological Anthropology.No categories
- A Nietzschean Bestiary: Becoming Animal Beyond Docile and Brutal.Babette Babbich,Debra Bergoffen,Thomas H. Brobjer,Daniel Conway,BrianCrowley,Brian Domino,Peter Groff,Jennifer Ham,Lawrence Hatab,Kathleen Marie Higgins,Vanessa Lemm,Paul S. Loeb,Nickolas Pappas,Richard Perkins,Gerd Schank,Alan D. Schrift,Gary Shapiro,Tracey Stark,Charles S. Taylor,Jami Weinstein &Martha Kendal Woodruff -2003 - Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Nietzsche's use of metaphor has been widely noted but rarely focused to explore specific images in great detail. A Nietzschean Bestiary gathers essays devoted to the most notorious and celebrated beasts in Nietzsche's work. The essays illustrate Nietzsche's ample use of animal imagery, and link it to the dual philosophical purposes of recovering and revivifying human animality, which plays a significant role in his call for de-deifying nature.
- Loose Constitutivity and Armchair Philosophy.Jonathan M. Weinberg &Stephen J.Crowley -2009 -Studia Philosophica Estonica 2 (2):177-195.Standard philosophical methodology which proceeds by appeal to intuitions accessible "from the armchair" has come under criticism on the basis of empirical work indicating unanticipated variability of such intuitions. Loose constitutivity---the idea that intuitions are partly, but not strictly, constitutive of the concepts that appear in them---offers an interesting line of response to this empirical challenge. On a loose constitutivist view, it is unlikely that our intuitions are incorrect across the board, since they partly fix the facts in question. But (...) we argue that this ratification of intuitions is at best rough and generic, and can only do the required methodological work if it operates in conjunction with some sort of further criteria of theory selection. We consider two that we find in the literature: naturalness (Brian Weatherson, borrowing from Lewis) and charity (Henry Jackman, borrowing from Davidson). At the end of the day, neither provides the armchair philosopher complete shelter from extra-armchair inquiry. (shrink)
- The self, the individual, and the community: Liberalism in the political thought of F.A. Hayek and Sidney and Beatrice Webb :Brian LeeCrowley , viii + 310 pp., £30.00. [REVIEW]Richard Bellamy -1990 -History of European Ideas 12 (2):293-294.
- Speech acts, actions, and events.Brian Ball -2021 - In Piotr Stalmaszczyk,The Cambridge Handbook of the Philosophy of Language. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
- Transcending the Moment.Brian Breeze -2007 -Philosophy Now 62:14-16.No categories
- Postponed Withholding Does Not Postpone Attachment.Brian S. Carter -2022 -American Journal of Bioethics 22 (11):27-30.Counseling parents on the cusp of delivering an extremely preterm infant is performed thousands of times every year in North America, Europe, Japan and in centers situated in other countries around...
- Reviewing the CD-ROM edition of Cook's Endeavour Journal.Brian Richardson -2000 -Theory and Event 4 (1).No categories
- Alterity, Similarity, and Dialectic.Brian Bajzek -2017 -International Philosophical Quarterly 57 (3):249-266.This paper builds upon John Dadosky’s recent writings advocating a “turn to the Other” in Lonergan studies. Using a Levinas/Lonergan dialogue on intersubjectivity as a test case, I address potential difficulties accompanying an exchange between Lonergan and philosophers who emphasize alterity. It is my contention that despite various differences regarding relationality, their projects are surprisingly complementary. Lonergan accentuates interconnectedness while Levinas emphasizes the encounter with radical otherness. In order to arrive at this conclusion, I argue for a re-assessment of the (...) relationship between alterity and similarity by dialectically reframing them as linked but opposed principles held in creative tension. Lastly, I suggest ways in which this approach might offer a foundation for further forays into the fourth stage of meaning. (shrink)No categories
- Playing Games, Following Rules, and Linguistic Activity.Brian Ball -2019 - In Piotr Stalmaszczyk,Philosophical Insights Into Pragmatics. Boston: De Gruyter. pp. 127-142.No categories
- A Treatise on Social Justice, Volume I: Theories of Justice.Brian Barry -1990 -Philosophy 65 (253):375-377.No categories
- America as Second Creation: Technology and Narratives of New Beginnings.Brian Garvey -2005 -Utopian Studies 16 (2):275-280.
- A Dilemma for Eternalists.Brian Garrett -2017 -Philosophia 45 (4):1735-1739.In this discussion I argue that, given the possibility of travel to the past, eternalists face a dilemma. They must choose between fatalism and the denial of an intuitive claim about what a traveller to the past cannot do. The eternalist should deny this seemingly intuitive claim which is in fact a version of fatalism about the past.No categories
- Endurantism Endures: Rejoinder to Barker and Dowe.Brian Garret -2017 -Manuscrito 40 (3):29-32.ABSTRACT In Barker and Dowe, Stephen Barker and Phil Dowe present a range of arguments which they take to demonstrate the paradoxical nature of endurantism. I claim that the endurantist has convincing replies to each argument.No categories
- Persons and human beings.Brian Garrett -forthcoming -Logos. Anales Del Seminario de Metafísica [Universidad Complutense de Madrid, España].Export citation
Bookmark - (1 other version)Some Thoughts on Animalism.Brian Garrett -2003 - In Klaus Petrus,On Human Persons. Heusenstamm Nr Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag. pp. 41-46.
- AIDS a Moral Issue -- Ethical, Legal and Social Aspects.Brian G. Gazzard -1992 -Journal of Medical Ethics 18 (1):51-52.
- " A Balance of Authority": Ponca Women's Cultural Autonomy through the Appropriation of the Ethnographic Interview.Brian Joseph Gilley -2010 -Intertexts 14 (2):113-122.
- Problematic Uses of Patristic Sources in the Documents of Catholic Social Thought.Brian Matz -2007 -Journal of Catholic Social Thought 4 (2):459-485.
- A Reader's Guide to "Gravity's Rainbow".Brian G. McHale &Douglas Fowler -1981 -Substance 10 (1):99.
- Buddhist Metaphysics.Brian Morris -2021 -Philosophy Now 146:16-19.No categories
- Media and Images.Brian Miller -1977 -Radical Philosophy 16:20.Export citation Bookmark
- Tintin and the eternal search.Brian Morton -2012 -The Chesterton Review 38 (1/2):299-302.No categories
- An Early Irish Adam and Eve: Saltair na Rann and the Traditions of the Fall.Brian Murdoch -1973 -Mediaeval Studies 35 (1):146-177.
- The rule of law in international affairs.Brian Simpson -2004 - In Simpson Brian,Proceedings of the British Academy Volume 125, 2003 Lectures. pp. 211-263.
- Adaptive dynamic models and the social contract.Brian Skyrms -2000 -Journal of Consciousness Studies 7 (1-2):335-339.
- Spatial and temporal dynamics of cortical networks engaged in memory encoding and retrieval.Brian T. Miller &Mark D'Esposito -2012 -Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 6.
- The Orient Strikes Back.Brian Moeran -1996 -Theory, Culture and Society 13 (3):77-112.
- Kant and the Human Subject.Brian Morris -2017 -Philosophy Now 123:26-30.No categories
- On Moral Fiction.Brian M. Carney -2002 -The Chesterton Review 28 (1/2):286-289.
- Intimate Conflict: Contradiction in Literary and Philosophical Discourse.Brian Caraher -1992 - SUNY Press.A demonstration of how rich and suggestive the notion of contradiction in discourse can be, noting its function in the works of Hesiod, Plato, Milton, Kant and Hegel, Wordsworth, Melville, Freud, and others. Concludes that rhetorical and conceptual contradictions produce--rather than disable--constructive discourse. Paper edition (unseen), $14.95. Annotation copyrighted by Book News, Inc., Portland, OR.No categories
- Dewey Anticipates Habermas's Paradigm of Communication: The Critique of Individualism and the Basis for Moral Authority inDemocracy and Education.Brian W. Dotts -2016 -Education and Culture 32 (1):111.Of unparalleled importance in John Dewey’s democratic philosophy is his focus on the process of change, or the “continuous reconstruction of experience.”1 But how is change to take place and under what circumstances does it best occur? What are the ramifications of Dewey’s theory of change and reconstruction on representative government and political rule? Is change expected to occur pragmatically as a planned process, or is change understood as inchoate phenomena occurring sporadically in Dewey’s philosophy? Who determines change and the (...) degree to which it shall take place? Why does Dewey prioritize democratic communication over other forms of communication?Dewey clearly connects his philosophy of change and... (shrink)
- John Lauritz Larson,Laid Waste! The Culture of Exploitation in Early America.Brian Allen Drake -2021 -Environmental Values 30 (3):387-389.
- Modern Philosophy: From 1500 Ce to the Present.Brian Duignan (ed.) -2010 - Britannica Educational.Jean bodin (b. 1530, Angers, France—d. June 1596, Laon, France) Jean Bodin was a French political philosopher whose exposition of the principles of stable government was widely influential in Europe at a time when medieval systems were ...
- A Chesterton Inquiry.Brian Durrans -1988 -The Chesterton Review 14 (2):363-363.
- Nouveaux conflits des facultés.ÉricBrian -2011 -Revue de Synthèse 132 (4):565-566.No categories
- Reductionism and explanation in legal theory.Brian Bix -2006 - In Timothy Endicott, Joshua Getzler & Edwin Peel,Properties of Law: Essays in Honour of Jim Harris. New York: Oxford University Press.Export citation Bookmark
- Income generation for non‐core university activities: a case study of the University of Central Lancashire.Brian Booth -1997 -Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education 1 (4):112-115.No categories
- Dwelling in Hell: T. S. Eliot’s Philosophy of Place inThe Wasteland.Brian J. Braman -2011 -Ultimate Reality and Meaning 34 (1-2):77-94.No categories
- Agnès Biard.ÉricBrian -2006 -Revue de Synthèse 127 (2):237-237.No categories
- Naturalism, Evil, and the Moral Monster.PeterBrian Barry -2017 - In Tom Sparrow & Jacob Graham,True Detective and Philosophy. New York: Wiley. pp. 76–86.The theoretical commitments of Rust Cohle, the philosopher detective of True Detective, tend toward nihilism. Cohle appears to be a tough‐minded naturalist. True Detective is a deep enough show that it offers some genuinely penetrating insights into evil and evil personhood. In True Detective evil is Errol William Childress: the "Lawnmower Man" of True Detective, with a yen for torturing, raping, murdering, and ritualistically posing young women. Childress is described as a "green‐eared spaghetti monster". Some philosophers suggest that there is (...) a link between evil people and monsters. Most philosophers agree that being an evil person is qualitatively worse than being a bad person or even a very, very bad person. Cohle does some bad stuff— and with impunity, by his own account— however he is not a pederast and he is not a child killer. That is a qualitative distinction. Childress seems to have killed more people than Cohle; that is a quantitative distinction. (shrink)No categories
- Présentation.Pierre-François Moreau et ÉricBrian -1998 -Revue de Synthèse 119 (2-3):189-191.No categories
- Capone, Bucca, Warner and Llewellyn on Pragmemes and “I hope You Will Let Flynn Go”.Brian E. Butler -2019 - In Alessandro Capone, Marco Carapezza & Franco Lo Piparo,Further Advances in Pragmatics and Philosophy: Part 2 Theories and Applications. Springer Verlag. pp. 587-594.In this volume, Alessandro Capone and Antonino Bucca’s essay makes a case, based upon the theory of pragmemes and socio-pragmatics, for taking Donald Trump’s statement to Comey, “I hope you will let Flynn go,” as an attempt of the President to get the then Federal Bureau of Investigation Director Comey to illegitimately drop the Russian probe, therefore being an illegal act of obstruction of justice. Their argument rests upon the claim that in this specific case, deniers of obstruction of justice (...) claims, when faced with Trump’s statements, must adopt a false theory of language in order to justify their conclusions. In his response, Richard Warner argues that though much of Capone and Bucca’s claims are convincing, and that much of the analysis of language in their article is accurate, even accepting their pragmeme and socio-pragmatic driven analysis, the content of Trump’s statement to Comey is not unequivocal enough to warrant certainty as to the obstruction claim. In this chapter one conclusion will be that Capone, Bucca and Warner all offer very important arguments useful in the accurate interpretation of Trump’s statement, and for interpretation in law generally. This conclusion will be supported and made more explicit by reading the essays in relation to Karl Llewellyn’s own constitutional theory, a theory that sees the constitution as an institution just partially, even minimally, based upon a purportedly “literal” reading of text. A further conclusion will be that theories of language, implicit or explicit, do indeed inevitably influence the analysis of statements like Trump’s at a very deep and profound level. Yet, thought this is all correct, I will argue that Trump’s statement, in context, cannot be read with such specificity so, in itself, it is sufficient evidence of obstruction of justice. (shrink)No categories
- Études Song in Memoriam Etienne BalazsEtudes Song in Memoriam Etienne Balazs.Brian E. McKnight,Françoise Aubin &Francoise Aubin -1973 -Journal of the American Oriental Society 93 (4):638.No categories
- The contingency argument.Brian Medlin -1966 -Sophia 5 (3):17-34.
- The theory of truth functions - II.Brian Medlin -1964 -Australasian Journal of Philosophy 42:183.No categories
- Explaining Behavior: Reasons in a World of Causes. [REVIEW]Brian P. McLaughlin -1991 -Philosophical Review 100 (4):641-645.
- Truth, Time and Deity.Brian McGuinness -1994 - In Brian F. McGuinness & Gianluigi Oliveri,The Philosophy of Michael Dummett. Dordrecht, Netherland: Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 229--239.No categories
- A Dictionary of Legal Theory.Brian Bix -2004 - New York: Oxford University Press.Modern legal theory contains a wide range of approaches and topics: from economic analysis of law to feminist legal theory to traditional analytical legal philosophy to a range of theories about justice. This healthy variety of jurisprudential work has created a problem: students and theorists working in one tradition may have difficulty understanding the concepts and terminology of a different tradition. This book works to make terminology and ways of thinking accessible. This dictionary covers topics from 'the autonomy of law' (...) to the 'will theory of rights', from 'autopoiesis' to 'wealth maximization', and from 'John Austin' to 'Ludwig Wittgenstein'. The most important concepts and ideas are presented in a simple dictionary format. There are also many longer entries, where the initial definition gives an accessible explanation, but the entry goes on to give more detailed information about the history of an idea and the debates currently surrounding it. (shrink)
- Kelsen in the United States: Still Misunderstood.Brian Bix -2016 - In D. A. Jeremy Telman,Hans Kelsen in America - Selective Affinities and the Mysteries of Academic Influence. Cham: Springer Verlag.No categoriesExport citation Bookmark
| 1 — 50 / 935 |
Off-campus access
Using PhilPapers from home?
Create an account to enable off-campus access through your institution's proxy server or OpenAthens.
Monitor this page
Be alerted of all new items appearing on this page. Choose how you want to monitor it:
 Email |  RSS feed |
Editorial team
General Editors:
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Area Editors:
David Bourget
Gwen Bradford
Berit Brogaard
Margaret Cameron
David Chalmers
James Chase
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Esa Diaz-Leon
Barry Hallen
Hans Halvorson
Jonathan Ichikawa
Monte Johnson
Michelle Kosch
Øystein Linnebo
Paul Livingston
Brandon Look
Manolo Martínez
Matthew McGrath
Michiru Nagatsu
Susana Nuccetelli
Giuseppe Primiero
Jack Alan Reynolds
Darrell P. Rowbottom
Aleksandra Samonek
Constantine Sandis
Howard Sankey
Jonathan Schaffer
Thomas Senor
Daniel Star
Jussi Suikkanen
Aness Kim Webster
Other editors
Contact us
Learn more about PhilPapers
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Area Editors:
David Bourget
Gwen Bradford
Berit Brogaard
Margaret Cameron
David Chalmers
James Chase
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Esa Diaz-Leon
Barry Hallen
Hans Halvorson
Jonathan Ichikawa
Monte Johnson
Michelle Kosch
Øystein Linnebo
Paul Livingston
Brandon Look
Manolo Martínez
Matthew McGrath
Michiru Nagatsu
Susana Nuccetelli
Giuseppe Primiero
Jack Alan Reynolds
Darrell P. Rowbottom
Aleksandra Samonek
Constantine Sandis
Howard Sankey
Jonathan Schaffer
Thomas Senor
Daniel Star
Jussi Suikkanen
Aness Kim Webster
Other editors
Contact us
Learn more about PhilPapers
Home |New books and articles |Bibliographies |Philosophy journals |About PhilPapers |API |Contact us |Code of conduct
PhilPapers logo byAndrea Andrews andMeghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see ourterms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications).Use of this site is subject toterms & conditions.
All rights reserved byThe PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-54b44b69b7-nwt9g uwo