Results for 'Beth Armstrong'
955 found
Order:
1 filter applied
- Delicious but Immoral? Ethical Information Influences Consumer Expectations and Experience of Food.BethArmstrong,Aaron Meskin &Pam Blundell-Birtill -2019 -Frontiers in Psychology 10.
- Confidentiality.MaryBethArmstrong -1994 -Professional Ethics, a Multidisciplinary Journal 3 (1):71-88.
- Professional Ethics and Accounting Education.MaryBethArmstrong -1990 -Business and Professional Ethics Journal 9 (1-2):181-191.
- Cultura, estudos literários e grande tempo.Beth Brait,Maria Helena Cruz Pistori,Bruna Lopes Dugnani,Paulo Rogério Stella &Carlos Gontijo Rosa -2023 -Bakhtiniana 18 (4):e64121p.No categories
- Os muitos sentidos compartilhados: Bakhtiniana e a Jornada comemorativa de seus 15 anos.Beth Brait,Maria Helena Cruz Pistori,Bruna Lopes,Paulo Rogério Stella,Regina Godinho de Alcântara &Adriana Pucci Faria Penteado E. Silva -2024 -Bakhtiniana 19 (4):e68180p.No categories
- New Steps on the Way to Open Science.Beth Brait,Maria Helena Cruz Pistori,Bruna Lopes Dugnani,Paulo Rogério Stella &Carlos Gontijo Rosa -2023 -Bakhtiniana 18 (1):2-7.No categories
- Responsabilidade ética na ciência, na arte e na vida.Beth Brait,Maria Helena Cruz Pistori,Bruna Lopes Dugnani,Paulo Rogério Stella &Carlos Gontijo Rosa -2023 -Bakhtiniana 18 (2):2-8.No categories
- Bakhtiniana 15 anos: interação de ciência, arte e vida.Beth Brait,Maria Helena Cruz Pistori,Bruna Lopes-Dugnani,Paulo Rogério Stella,Carlos Gontijo Rosa,Letícia Jovelina Storto &Regina Godinho de Alcântara -2024 -Bakhtiniana 19 (2):e66200p.No categories
- Mathematical Epistemology and Psychology.E. V.BETH -1966No categories
- “O gênero sempre é novo e velho ao mesmo tempo”. Novidades.Beth Brait,Maria Helena Cruz Pistori,Bruna Lopes Dugnani,Paulo Rogério Stella &Carlos Gontijo Rosa -2023 -Bakhtiniana 18 (3):e63192.No categories
- A dialógica linguagem infantil.Beth Brait,Maria Helena Cruz Pistori,Bruna Lopes-Dugnani &Renata Philippov -2021 -Bakhtiniana 16 (1):2-3.No categories
- Análise da verbo-visualidade: contribuições para os estudos do discurso.Beth Brait &Maria Helena Cruz Pistori -2013 -Bakhtiniana 8 (2):2-4.No categories
- Bakhtin and Linguistics: A Dialogue Settled in the Beginning of the 20’s.Beth Brait,Geraldo Tadeu Souza,Marília Amorim,Adriana Pucci Faria Penteado E. Silva,Maria Helena Cruz Pistori,Carlos Gontijo Rosa,Paulo Rogério Stella &Letícia Jovelina Storto -2025 -Bakhtiniana 20 (1):e66039p.RESUMO Em diversas obras do Círculo (Bakhtin, Volóchinov, Medviédev), a referência a Saussure e/ou às especificidades da Linguística, enquanto ciência da língua, pode ser encontrada em diálogo, mais ou menos polêmico, entre pensadores e tendências epistemológicas, teóricas e metodológicas que propõem diferentes abordagens para a complexidade representada pela linguagem humana e, consequentemente, para seu estudo. Neste artigo, o objetivo é circunscrever e discutir a presença da Linguística, enquanto ciência da língua instaurada por Saussure, nos escritos de Mikhail Bakhtin. Após uma (...) introdução, o texto se organiza em três seções, que tratam (1) de uma forte presença de Saussure nos escritos do Círculo; (2) do diálogo de Bakhtin com a ciência na unidade da cultura; (3) do diálogo com a ciência linguística da escola de Genebra em “O problema do conteúdo, do material e da forma”; e, finalmente, de considerações inconclusas, mas necessárias. Destacam-se importantes momentos-chave de reflexão em textos assinados por Bakhtin, em que Saussure (ainda que não nomeado, mas designado pela ciência por ele estabelecida) merece destaque, como contraponto científico-filosófico necessário para a constituição de outra possibilidade de compreensão e estudo da linguagem: a perspectiva dialógica. Como resultado, espera-se demonstrar que, desde os anos 1920, o diálogo Bakhtin/Saussure se estabelece, para distinguir e qualificar duas formas complementares de compreensão da linguagem e do lugar da ciência na unidade da cultura. (shrink)No categories
- Bakhtin e a Linguística: um diálogo iniciado nos anos 1920.Beth Brait,Geraldo Tadeu Souza,Marília Amorim,Adriana Pucci Faria Penteado E. Silva,Maria Helena Cruz Pistori,Carlos Gontijo Rosa,Paulo Rogério Stella &Letícia Jovelina Storto -2025 -Bakhtiniana 20 (1):e66039p.ABSTRACT In several works by the Circle (Bakhtin, Vološinov, Medvedev), the reference to Saussure and/or the specificities of Linguistics, as a science of language, can be found in a dialogue, more or less controversial, between thinkers and epistemological, theoretical and methodological trends that propose different approaches to the complexity represented by human language and, consequently, to its study. In this article, the objective is to circumscribe and discuss the presence of Linguistics, as a science of language established by Saussure, in (...) the writings of Mikhail Bakhtin. After an introduction, the text is organized into three sections, which deal with (1) Saussure’s strong presence in the Circle’s writings; (2) Bakhtin’s dialogue with science in the unity of culture; (3) the dialogue with the linguistic science of the Geneva school in “PCMF”; and, finally, of inconclusive but necessary considerations. Important key moments of reflection stand out in texts signed by Bakhtin, in which Saussure (although not named, but designated by the science he established) deserves to be highlighted, as a necessary scientific-philosophical counterpoint for the constitution of another possibility of understanding and study of language: the dialogical perspective. As a result, it is expected to demonstrate that, since the 1920s, the Bakhtin/Saussure dialogue has been established to distinguish and qualify two complementary ways of understanding language and the place of science in the unity of culture. (shrink)No categories
- Dialogs in Hard Times.Beth Brait,Maria Helena Cruz Pistori,Bruna Lopes Dugnani,Paulo Rogério Stella &Carlos Gontijo Rosa -2022 -Bakhtiniana 17 (2):2-8.No categories
- Entre o semiótico e o ideológico.Beth Brait -2015 -Bakhtiniana 10 (3):5-26.No categories
- The open door: Counterfactual versus singularist theories of causation.David M.Armstrong -1999 - In Howard Sankey,Causation and Laws of Nature. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 175--185.
- Semantic Entailment and Formal Derivability.Evert WillemBeth -1955 - Noord-Hollandsche.No categories
- Dispositions as categorical states.David M.Armstrong -1996 - In Tim Crane, D. M. Armstrong & C. B. Martin,Dispositions: A Debate. New York: Routledge. pp. 15--18.
- De Wijsbegeerte der Wiskunde van Parmenides Tot Bolzano.Evert W.Beth -1946 -Journal of Symbolic Logic 11 (3):89-90.
- Comment on Smart.D. M.Armstrong -1999 - In Howard Sankey,Causation and Laws of Nature. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 171--172.
- The Problem of Desire in Human Knowing and Loving.Beth Beshear -2002 -Method 20 (2):155-173.
- (1 other version)Actes du ille congrès Des sociétés de philosophie de langue française.E. W.Beth -1947 -Synthese 6 (5-6):244-245.No categories
- Borgers Alfons. Het natuurlijke getal . Simon Stevin , vol. 26 , pp. 32–73.E. W.Beth -1950 -Journal of Symbolic Logic 15 (1):66-67.
- Basing 'Ought' On 'Is'.Beth Singer -1994 -Metaphilosophy 25 (4):304-315.
- Burkamp Wilhelm. Wirklichkeit und Sinn. Junker und Dünnhaupt, Berlin 1938, zwei Bände, 327, 538 S.Evert W.Beth -1941 -Journal of Symbolic Logic 6 (3):98-99.
- « Cogito ergo sum »- raisonnement ou intuition?Par E. W.Beth -1958 -Dialectica 12 (3‐4):223-235.RésuméSelon Descartes, la force démonstrative d'une argumentation peut résulter ou bien de l'application des règles universelles de la logique ou bien d'une intuition particulière. Cette doctrine permet d'éviter le reproche de circularité qui est souvent fait à l'égard de certaines argumentations épistémologiques. D'autre part, elle implique le rejet de la méthode du contre‐exemple. L'acception de certaines argumentations en vertu d'une intuition particulière ne crée pas une situation définitive; elle constitue une phase dans la genèse de ce que Bernays a caractérisé (...) comme une évidence acquise.ZusammenfassungNach Descartes kann die Beweiskraft einer Argumentation entweder von der Anwendung der allgemeingültigen Regeln der Logik oder von einer besonderen Anschauung herrühren. Diese Ansicht erlaubt uns, dem Einwand der Zirkelhaftigkeit zu entgehen, welcher öfters gegen gewisse erkenntnistheoretische Argumentationen erhoben wird. Sie erfordert anderseits den Verzicht auf die Methode der Gegenbeispiele. Die Hinnahme gewisser Argumentationen auf Grund einer besonderen Anschauung schafft niemals eine bleibende Situation; sie bildet eine Phase im Zustandekommen dessen, was Bernays als eine erworbene Evidenz charakterisiert hat.According to Descartes, the demonstrative power of an argumentation may result either from the application of the universal rules of logic or from a particular intuition. This doctrine permits us to avoid the reproach of circularity which is often raised as an objection to certain argumentations in epistemology. On the other hand, it implies the rejection of the method of the counter‐example. The acceptance of certain argumentations based on a particular intuition never creates a permanent situation; it rather constitutes a stage in the genesis of what Bernays has characterized as an évidence acquise. (shrink)
- Cohen Jonathan. Mr. Strawson's analysis of truth. Analysis , vol. 10 no. 6 , pp. 136–140.E. W.Beth -1951 -Journal of Symbolic Logic 16 (2):137-138.
- Ducasse C. J.. Symbols, signs, and signals.EvertBeth -1940 -Journal of Symbolic Logic 5 (2):79-80.
- (1 other version)Das Erlebnis in Religion und Magie.KarlBeth -1925 -Kant Studien 30 (1-2):381-408.
- Dialectique et Logique.E. W.Beth,F. Gonseth,I. M. Bochenski &J. Piaget -1950 -Journal of Symbolic Logic 15 (2):145-147.
- Decision Problems of Logic and Mathematics.E. W.Beth -1957 -Journal of Symbolic Logic 22 (4):359-359.
- De wijsbegeerte der wiskunde van Parmenides tot Bolzano.Evert WillemBeth -1944 - Nijmegen: Dekker & Van de Vegt.
- Door Wetenschap tot Wijsheid.E. W.Beth -1964 -Journal of Symbolic Logic 29 (2):90-91.
- Errata.E. W.Beth -1951 -British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 1 (4):302-302.Professor P. Bernays has kindly drawn my attention to the tact that the assignment of Gödel numbers to formulas described on page 295 of volume I of this Journal, is not correct. Under this assignment, different formulas may obtain the same Gödel number and therefore the argument given on page 296 under (i) is not cogent. The correct assignment would give, for the formula considered as an example, the Gödel number 23. 329. 514. 732 The correction to be made on (...) page 294, l. 20 is obvious. (shrink)
- Entwicklung und Offenbarung.KarlBeth -1907 -Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 4 (19):520-523.
- Formal Methods: An Introduction to Symbolic Logic and to the Study of Effective Operations in Arithmetic and Logic.Evert WillemBeth -2012 - Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer Verlag.Many philosophers have considered logical reasoning as an inborn ability of mankind and as a distinctive feature in the human mind; but we all know that the distribution of this capacity, or at any rate its development, is very unequal. Few people are able to set up a cogent argument; others are at least able to follow a logical argument and even to detect logical fallacies. Nevertheless, even among educated persons there are many who do not even attain this relatively (...) modest level of development. According to my personal observations, lack of logical ability may be due to various circumstances. In the first place, I mention lack of general intelligence, insufficient power of concentration, and absence of formal education. Secondly, however, I have noticed that many people are unable, or sometimes rather unwilling, to argue ex hypothesi; such persons cannot, or will not, start from premisses which they know or believe to be false or even from premisses whose truth is not, in their opinion, sufficient ly warranted. Or, if they agree to start from such premisses, they sooner or later stray away from the argument into attempts first to settle the truth or falsehood of the premisses. Presumably this attitude results either from lack of imagination or from undue moral rectitude. On the other hand, proficiency in logical reasoning is not in itself a guarantee for a clear theoretic insight into the principles and foundations of logic. (shrink)
- Geschiedenis der logica.Evert WillemBeth -1944 - Den Haag: Servire.No categories
- Heyting A.. Intuïtionistische wiskunde . Mathematica B, vol. 7 , pp. 129–142.EvertBeth -1940 -Journal of Symbolic Logic 5 (2):73-74.
- History of Logic.E. W.Beth -1952 -Journal of Symbolic Logic 17 (4):286-286.
- Helmer Olaf. Languages with expressions of infinite length. Erkenntnis, vol. 7 no. 3 , pp. 138–141.EvertBeth -1939 -Journal of Symbolic Logic 4 (1):25-25.
- "H. Scholz and G. hasenjaeger", grundzüge der mathematischen logik.E. W.Beth -1962 -Synthese 14 (2/3):226.No categoriesExport citation
Bookmark - Introduction.E. W.Beth -1946 -Synthese 5 (3-4):187-187.
- I Fondamenti Logici della Matematica.E. W.Beth &Ettore Casari -1971 -Journal of Symbolic Logic 36 (2):325-325.
- Introduction à la Philosophie des Sciences Exactes.Evert W.Beth -1960 -Journal of Symbolic Logic 25 (1):70-71.
- Inleiding tot de wijsbegeerte der exacte wetenschappen.Evert WillemBeth -1953 - Antwerpen,: Standaard-Boekhandel.
- Kneale William. Boole and the revival of logic. Mind, n.s. vol. 57 , pp. 149–175.Evert W.Beth -1949 -Journal of Symbolic Logic 14 (1):61-61.
- Logica.E. W.Beth -1946 -Journal of Symbolic Logic 11 (4):125-125.
- Logistic as a Continuation of Traditional Formal Logic.E. W.Beth -1941 -Journal of Symbolic Logic 6 (2):63-64.
- Logic and Foundations-Research 1940-1945.E. W.Beth -1946 -Journal of Symbolic Logic 11 (4):134-134.
| 1 — 50 / 955 |
Off-campus access
Using PhilPapers from home?
Create an account to enable off-campus access through your institution's proxy server or OpenAthens.
Monitor this page
Be alerted of all new items appearing on this page. Choose how you want to monitor it:
 Email |  RSS feed |
Editorial team
General Editors:
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Area Editors:
David Bourget
Gwen Bradford
Berit Brogaard
Margaret Cameron
David Chalmers
James Chase
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Esa Diaz-Leon
Barry Hallen
Hans Halvorson
Jonathan Ichikawa
Monte Johnson
Michelle Kosch
Øystein Linnebo
Paul Livingston
Brandon Look
Manolo Martínez
Matthew McGrath
Michiru Nagatsu
Susana Nuccetelli
Giuseppe Primiero
Jack Alan Reynolds
Darrell P. Rowbottom
Aleksandra Samonek
Constantine Sandis
Howard Sankey
Jonathan Schaffer
Thomas Senor
Daniel Star
Jussi Suikkanen
Aness Kim Webster
Other editors
Contact us
Learn more about PhilPapers
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Area Editors:
David Bourget
Gwen Bradford
Berit Brogaard
Margaret Cameron
David Chalmers
James Chase
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Esa Diaz-Leon
Barry Hallen
Hans Halvorson
Jonathan Ichikawa
Monte Johnson
Michelle Kosch
Øystein Linnebo
Paul Livingston
Brandon Look
Manolo Martínez
Matthew McGrath
Michiru Nagatsu
Susana Nuccetelli
Giuseppe Primiero
Jack Alan Reynolds
Darrell P. Rowbottom
Aleksandra Samonek
Constantine Sandis
Howard Sankey
Jonathan Schaffer
Thomas Senor
Daniel Star
Jussi Suikkanen
Aness Kim Webster
Other editors
Contact us
Learn more about PhilPapers
Home |New books and articles |Bibliographies |Philosophy journals |About PhilPapers |API |Contact us |Code of conduct
PhilPapers logo byAndrea Andrews andMeghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see ourterms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications).Use of this site is subject toterms & conditions.
All rights reserved byThe PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-5b9ff6f457-db555 uwo