Movatterモバイル変換

[0]ホーム
URL:

PhilPapersPhilPeoplePhilArchivePhilEventsPhilJobs

Works by Bernard W. Kobes

(view other items matching `Bernard W. Kobes`,view all matches )
18 found
Order:

1 filter applied
Disambiguations
Bernard W. Kobes [19]Bernard William Kobes [1]
  1.  57
    Thought and Reference.Bernard W. Kobes -1991 -Philosophical Review 100 (3):469.
  2.  103
    The Philosopher’s Projective Error.Bernard W. Kobes -2007 -Philosophical Studies 132 (3):581-593.
    This paper is a discussion of Michael Thau's interesting critique in Chapter 2 of Consciousness and Cognition, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002, of the common view that beliefs are internal states.
    Direct download(4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  3.  44
    Access and what it is like.Bernard W. Kobes -1995 -Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (2):260-260.
    Block's cases of superblindsight, the pneumatic drill, and the Sperling experiments do not show that P-consciousness and Aconsciousness can come apart. On certain tendentious but not implausible construals of the concepts of P- and A-consciousness, they refer to the same psychological phenomenon.
    Direct download(4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  4.  86
    Telic higher-order thoughts and Moore's paradox.Bernard W. Kobes -1995 -Philosophical Perspectives 9:291-312.
  5.  88
    (1 other version)Mental content and hot self-knowledge.Bernard W. Kobes -1996 -Philosophical Topics 24 (1):71-99.
  6.  62
    Self-attributions help constitute mental types.Bernard W. Kobes -1993 -Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (1):54-56.
  7.  51
    Semantics and psychological prototypes.Bernard W. Kobes -1989 -Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 70 (March):1-18.
  8.  115
    Individualism and artificial intelligence.Bernard W. Kobes -1990 -Philosophical Perspectives 4:429-56.
  9.  39
    Sensory qualities and 'Homunctionalism': A review essay of W. G. Lycan'sconsciousness.Bernard W. Kobes -1991 -Philosophical Psychology 4 (1):147-158.
  10.  66
    Burge's dualism.Bernard W. Kobes -2010 - In Robert C. Koons & George Bealer,The waning of materialism. New York: Oxford University Press.
  11.  119
    Metacognition and consciousness: Review essay of Janet Metcalfe and Arthur P. shimamura (eds),Metacognition: Knowing About Knowing.Bernard W. Kobes -1997 -Philosophical Psychology 10 (1):93-102.
    The field of metacognition, richly sampled in the book under review, is recognized as an important and growing branch of psychology. However, the field stands in need of a general theory that (1) provides a unified framework for understanding the variety of metacognitive processes, (2) articulates the relation between metacognition and consciousness, and (3) tells us something about the form of meta-level representations and their relations to object-level representations. It is argued that the higher-order thought theory of consciousness supplies us (...) with the rudiments of a theory that meets these desiderata and integrates the principal findings reported in this collection. (shrink)
    Direct download(3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  12.  47
    On a model for psycho-neural coevolution.Bernard W. Kobes -1991 -Behavior and Philosophy 19 (2):1-17.
    According to a model of inter-theoretic relations advocated by Patricia S. Churchland, psychology will need to revise its theories so as to fit them for "smooth reduction" to the neurosciences, and this will lead to the elimination of reference to intentional contents from psychology. It is argued that this model is ambiguous; on one reading it is empirically implausible, on the other its methodology is confused. The connectionist program NETtalk, far from exemplifying the model as Churchland claims, suggests a theoretical (...) rationale for employing relations to intentional contents in psychology. (shrink)
    Direct download(2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  13.  94
    Unity of consciousness and bi-level externalism.Bernard W. Kobes -2000 -Mind and Language 15 (5):528-544.
  14. The papers in this volume are a selection of the papers presented at the American Philosophical Association Pacific Division Meeting of 1994. The papers were selected by the 1993-1994 Pacific Division Program Committee, whose members include: Jean Hampton (Chair). [REVIEW]Harriet Baber,David Copp,David Depew,John Dupr,Reinaldo Elugardo,John Martin Fischer,Don Garrett,Richard Healey,Bernard W. Kobes &Bruce Landesman -unknown -Philosophical Studies 77 (193):t995.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  15.  31
    Book Review: Rationality. Harold I. Brown. [REVIEW]Bernard W. Kobes -1990 -Ethics 100 (3):672-.
    Direct download(4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  16.  27
    Book reviews. [REVIEW]Bernard W. Kobes -1992 -Mind 101 (403):603-609.
    No categories
    Direct download(3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  17.  57
    Review of Michael Tye'sConsciousness and Persons. [REVIEW]Bernard W. Kobes -2005 -PSYCHE: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Research On Consciousness 11.
    Consciousness has been defined as that annoying period between naps, and this grumpy definition may not be wholly facetious, if Michael Tye's latest book is right. Tye's main goal here is to develop a theory of the phenomenal unity of experience at a time, and its diachronic analog, the moment-to-moment continuity of one's experiential stream from the time one wakes up to the time consciousness lapses.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  18.  35
    Working Without a Net. [REVIEW]Bernard W. Kobes -1994 -Review of Metaphysics 47 (3):613-614.
    To say that S's belief or action is rational is to say, according to Foley, that from a certain belief perspective it appears to satisfy certain of S's goals. This approach is firmly teleological in character, and does not take "rules" or "virtues" of rationality to be fundamental. Precisely which belief perspective, and which of S's goals, are relevant here? We should acknowledge many notions of rationality, says Foley, depending on how we fix these parameters. We might take all of (...) S's goals to be relevant, or perhaps only S's desire to have accurate and comprehensive beliefs. And we might take as relevant the belief perspective of experts in S's community, or that of an objectively knowledgeable observer, or that of S alone were S to be deeply reflective. (shrink)
    Direct download(2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
Export
Limit to items.
Filters





Configure languageshere.Sign in to use this feature.

Viewing options


Open Category Editor
Off-campus access
Using PhilPapers from home?

Create an account to enable off-campus access through your institution's proxy server or OpenAthens.

Monitor this page
Be alerted of all new items appearing on this page. Choose how you want to monitor it:

Email RSS feed
Home |New books and articles |Bibliographies |Philosophy journals |About PhilPapers |API |Contact us |Code of conduct

CDPPhiosophy Documentation Center
PhilPapers logo byAndrea Andrews andMeghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see ourterms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications).

Use of this site is subject toterms & conditions.
All rights reserved byThe PhilPapers Foundation

Server: philpapers-web-54b44b69b7-g6h22 uwo
[8]ページ先頭
©2009-2025 Movatter.jp