Interdisciplinary approaches to the phenomenology of auditory verbal hallucinations.Angela Woods,Nev Jones,Marco Bernini,Felicity Callard,Ben Alderson-Day,Johanna Badcock,Vaughn Bell,Chris Cook,Thomas Csordas,Clara Humpston,Joel Krueger,Frank Laroi,Simon McCarthy-Jones,Peter Moseley,Hilary Powell &Andrea Raballo -2014 -Schizophrenia Bulletin 40:S246-S254.detailsDespite the recent proliferation of scientific, clinical, and narrative accounts of auditory verbal hallucinations, the phenomenology of voice hearing remains opaque and undertheorized. In this article, we outline an interdisciplinary approach to understanding hallucinatory experiences which seeks to demonstrate the value of the humanities and social sciences to advancing knowledge in clinical research and practice. We argue that an interdisciplinary approach to the phenomenology of AVH utilizes rigorous and context-appropriate methodologies to analyze a wider range of first-person accounts of AVH (...) at 3 contextual levels: cultural, social, and historical; experiential; and biographical. We go on to show that there are significant potential benefits for voice hearers, clinicians, and researchers. These include informing the development and refinement of subtypes of hallucinations within and across diagnostic categories; “front-loading” research in cognitive neuroscience; and suggesting new possibilities for therapeutic intervention. In conclusion, we argue that an interdisciplinary approach to the phenomenology of AVH can nourish the ethical core of scientific enquiry by challenging its interpretive paradigms, and offer voice hearers richer, potentially more empowering ways to make sense of their experiences. (shrink)
Voices and Thoughts in Psychosis: An Introduction.Sam Wilkinson &Ben Alderson-Day -2016 -Review of Philosophy and Psychology 7 (3):529-540.detailsIn this introduction we present the orthodox account of auditory verbal hallucinations, a number of worries for this account, and some potential responses open to its proponents. With some problems still remaining, we then introduce the problems presented by the phenomenon of thought insertion, in particular the question of how different it is supposed to be from AVHs. We then mention two ways in which theorists have adopted different approaches to voices and thoughts in psychosis, and then present the motivation (...) and composition of this special issue. (shrink)