Movatterモバイル変換

[0]ホーム
URL:

PhilPapersPhilPeoplePhilArchivePhilEventsPhilJobs

Works by Asheley Landrum

(view other items matching `Asheley Landrum`,view all matches )
7 found
Order:

1 filter applied
Disambiguations
Asheley R. Landrum [5]Asheley Landrum [3]
  1.  288
    Development of a Novel Methodology for Ascertaining Scientific Opinion and Extent of Agreement.Vickers Peter,Ludovica Adamo,Mark Alfano,Cory J. Clark,Eleonora Cresto,He Cui,Haixin Dang,Finnur Dellsén,Nathalie Dupin,Laura Gradowski,Simon Graf,Aline Guevara,Mark Hallap,Jesse Hamilton,Mariann Hardey,Paula Helm,Asheley Landrum,Neil Levy,Edouard Machery,Sarah Mills,Sean Muller,Joanne Sheppard,Shinod N. K.,Matthew Slater,Jacob Stegenga,Henning Strandin,Mike Stuart,David Sweet,Ufuk Tasdan,Henry Taylor,Owen Towler,Dana Tulodziecki,Heidi Tworek,Rebecca Wallbank,Harald Wiltsche &Samantha Mitchell Finnigan -2024 -PLoS ONE 19 (12):1-24.
    We take up the challenge of developing an international network with capacity to survey the world's scientists on an ongoing basis, providing rich datasets regarding the opinions of scientists and scientific sub-communities, both at a time and also over time. The novel methodology employed sees local coordinators, at each institution in the network, sending survey invitation emails internally to scientists at their home institution. The emails link to a ‘10 second survey’, where the participant is presented with a single statement (...) to consider, and a standard five point Likert scale. In June 2023, a group of 30 philosophers and social scientists invited 20,085 scientists across 30 institutions in 12 countries to participate, gathering 6,807 responses to the statement 'Science has put it beyond reasonable doubt that COVID-19 is caused by a virus'. The study demonstrates that it is possible to establish a global network to quickly ascertain scientific opinion on a large international scale, with high response rate, low opt-out rate, and in a way that allows for significant (perhaps indefinite) repeatability. Measuring scientific opinion in this new way would be a valuable complement to currently available approaches, potentially informing policy decisions and public understanding across diverse fields. (shrink)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  2. Development of a novel methodology for ascertaining scientific opinion and extent of agreement.Peter Vickers,Ludovica Adamo,Mark Alfano,Cory J. Clark,Eleonora Cresto,He Cui,Haixin Dang,Finnur Dellsen,Nathalie Dupin,Laura Gradowski,Simon Graf,Aline Guevara,Mark Hallap,Jesse Hamilton,Mariann Hardey,Paula Helm,Asheley Landrum,Neil Levy,Edouard Machery,Sarah Mills,Sean Muller,Joanne Sheppard,Shinod N. K.,Matthew Slater,Jacob Stegenga,Henning Strandin,Michael T. Stuart,David Sweet,Tasdan Ufuk,Henry Taylor,Towler Owen,Dana Tulodziecki,Heidi Tworek,Rebecca Wallbank,Harald Wiltsche &Samantha Mitchell Finnigan -2024 -PLoS ONE 19 ((12)).
    We take up the challenge of developing an international network with capacity to survey the world’s scientists on an ongoing basis, providing rich datasets regarding the opinions of scientists and scientific sub-communities, both at a time and also over time. The novel methodology employed sees local coordinators, at each institution in the network, sending survey invitation emails internally to scientists at their home institution. The emails link to a ‘10 second survey’, where the participant is presented with a single statement (...) to consider, and a standard five-point Likert scale. In June 2023, a group of 30 philosophers and social scientists invited 20,085 scientists across 30 institutions in 12 countries to participate, gathering 6,807 responses to the statement Science has put it beyond reasonable doubt that COVID-19 is caused by a virus. The study demonstrates that it is possible to establish a global network to quickly ascertain scientific opinion on a large international scale, with high response rate, low opt-out rate, and in a way that allows for significant (perhaps indefinite) repeatability. Measuring scientific opinion in this new way would be a valuable complement to currently available approaches, potentially informing policy decisions and public understanding across diverse fields. (shrink)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  3.  25
    How do children weigh competence and benevolence when deciding whom to trust?Angie M. Johnston,Candice M. Mills &Asheley R. Landrum -2015 -Cognition 144 (C):76-90.
    No categories
    Direct download(3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  4.  21
    Development of a novel methodology for ascertaining scientific opinion and extent of agreement.Peter Vickers,Ludovica Adamo,Mark Alfano,Cory Clark,Eleonora Cresto,He Cui,Haixin Dang,Finnur Dellsén,Nathalie Dupin,Laura Gradowski,Simon Graf,Aline Guevara,Mark Hallap,Jesse Hamilton,Mariann Hardey,Paula Helm,Asheley Landrum,Neil Levy,Edouard Machery,Sarah Mills,Seán Muller,Joanne Sheppard,Shinod N. K.,Matthew Slater,Jacob Stegenga,Henning Strandin,Michael T. Stuart,David Sweet,Ufuk Tasdan,Henry Taylor,Owen Towler,Dana Tulodziecki,Heidi Tworek,Rebecca Wallbank,Harald Wiltsche &Samantha Mitchell Finnigan -unknown
    We take up the challenge of developing an international network with capacity to survey the world’s scientists on an ongoing basis, providing rich datasets regarding the opinions of scientists and scientific sub-communities, both at a time and also over time. The novel methodology employed sees local coordinators, at each institution in the network, sending survey invitation emails internally to scientists at their home institution. The emails link to a ‘10 second survey’, where the participant is presented with a single statement (...) to consider, and a standard five-point Likert scale. In June 2023, a group of 30 philosophers and social scientists invited 20,085 scientists across 30 institutions in 12 countries to participate, gathering 6,807 responses to the statement Science has put it beyond reasonable doubt that COVID-19 is caused by a virus. The study demonstrates that it is possible to establish a global network to quickly ascertain scientific opinion on a large international scale, with high response rate, low opt-out rate, and in a way that allows for significant (perhaps indefinite) repeatability. Measuring scientific opinion in this new way would be a valuable complement to currently available approaches, potentially informing policy decisions and public understanding across diverse fields. (shrink)
    No categories
    Direct download(2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5.  36
    Learning Who Knows What: Children Adjust Their Inquiry to Gather Information from Others.Candice M. Mills &Asheley R. Landrum -2016 -Frontiers in Psychology 7.
  6.  29
    Developing expectations regarding the boundaries of expertise.Asheley R. Landrum &Candice M. Mills -2015 -Cognition 134 (C):215-231.
    No categories
    Direct download(3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  7.  24
    Processing the papal encyclical through perceptual filters: Pope Francis, identity-protective cognition, and climate change concern.Asheley R. Landrum,Robert B. Lull,Heather Akin,Ariel Hasell &Kathleen Hall Jamieson -2017 -Cognition 166 (C):1-12.
    Direct download(3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
Export
Limit to items.
Filters





Configure languageshere.Sign in to use this feature.

Viewing options


Open Category Editor
Off-campus access
Using PhilPapers from home?

Create an account to enable off-campus access through your institution's proxy server or OpenAthens.

Monitor this page
Be alerted of all new items appearing on this page. Choose how you want to monitor it:

Email RSS feed
Home |New books and articles |Bibliographies |Philosophy journals |About PhilPapers |API |Contact us |Code of conduct

CDPPhiosophy Documentation Center
PhilPapers logo byAndrea Andrews andMeghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see ourterms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications).

Use of this site is subject toterms & conditions.
All rights reserved byThe PhilPapers Foundation

Server: philpapers-web-54b44b69b7-nwt9g uwo
[8]ページ先頭
©2009-2025 Movatter.jp