Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


PhilPapersPhilPeoplePhilArchivePhilEventsPhilJobs
Order:

1 filter applied
Disambiguations
Arnold Kochari [3]Arnold R. Kochari [1]
  1.  22
    Generics and Alternatives.Arnold Kochari,Robert Van Rooij &Katrin Schulz -2020 -Frontiers in Psychology 11.
  2.  29
    Questions About Quantifiers: Symbolic and Nonsymbolic Quantity Processing by the Brain.Jakub Szymanik,Arnold Kochari &Heming Strømholt Bremnes -2023 -Cognitive Science 47 (10):e13346.
    One approach to understanding how the human cognitive system stores and operates with quantifiers such as “some,” “many,” and “all” is to investigate their interaction with the cognitive mechanisms for estimating and comparing quantities from perceptual input (i.e., nonsymbolic quantities). While a potential link between quantifier processing and nonsymbolic quantity processing has been considered in the past, it has never been discussed extensively. Simultaneously, there is a long line of research within the field of numerical cognition on the relationship between (...) processing exact number symbols (such as “3” or “three”) and nonsymbolic quantity. This accumulated knowledge can potentially be harvested for research on quantifiers since quantifiers and number symbols are two different ways of referring to quantity information symbolically. The goal of the present review is to survey the research on the relationship between quantifiers and nonsymbolic quantity processing mechanisms and provide a set of research directions and specific questions for the investigation of quantifier processing. (shrink)
    Direct download(2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3.  21
    Introducing a replication-first rule for Ph.D. projects.Arnold R. Kochari &Markus Ostarek -2018 -Behavioral and Brain Sciences 41.
    Direct download(2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4.  9
    Grounding a Pragmatic Theory of Vagueness on Experimental Data: Semi-orders and Weber’s Law.Robert van Rooij &Arnold Kochari -2019 - In Richard Dietz,Vagueness and Rationality in Language Use and Cognition. Springer Verlag. pp. 153-183.
    One of the traditional pragmatic approaches to vagueness suggests that there needs to be a significant gap between individuals or objects that can be described using a vague adjective like tall and those that cannot. In contrast, intuitively, an explicit comparative like taller does not require fulfillment of the gap requirement. Our starting point for this paper is the consideration that people cannot make precise measures under time pressure and their ability to discriminate approximate heights obeys Weber’s law. We formulate (...) and experimentally test three hypotheses relating to the difference between positive and comparative forms of the vague adjectives, gap requirement, and Weber’s law. In two experiments, participants judged appropriateness of usage of positive and comparative forms of vague adjectives in a sentence-picture verification task. Consequently, we review formal analysis of vagueness using weak orders and semi-orders and suggest adjustments based on the experimental results and properties of Weber’s law. (shrink)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
Export
Limit to items.
Filters





Configure languageshere.Sign in to use this feature.

Viewing options


Open Category Editor
Off-campus access
Using PhilPapers from home?

Create an account to enable off-campus access through your institution's proxy server or OpenAthens.


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp