Results for 'Angela Rossetti'
984 found
Order:
1 filter applied
- Considerations for applying bioethics norms to a biopharmaceutical industry setting.Wendell Fortson,Kathleen Novak Stern,Curtis Chang,AngelaRossetti,Ariella Kelman,Michael Turik,Donald G. Therasse,Tatjana Poplazarova &Luann E. Van Campen -2021 -BMC Medical Ethics 22 (1).BackgroundThe biopharmaceutical industry operates at the intersection of life sciences, clinical research, clinical care, public health, and business, which presents distinct operational and ethical challenges. This setting merits focused bioethics consideration to complement legal compliance and business ethics efforts. However, bioethics as applied to a biopharmaceutical industry setting often is construed either too broadly or too narrowly with little examination of its proper scope.Main textAny institution with a scientific or healthcare mission should engage bioethics norms to navigate ethical issues that (...) arise from the conduct of biomedical research, delivery of clinical care, or implementation of public health programs. It is reasonable to assume that while bioethics norms must remain constant, their application will vary depending on the characteristics of a given setting. Context “specification” substantively refines ethics norms for a particular discipline or setting and is an expected, needed and progressive ethical activity. In order for this activity to be meaningful, the scope for bioethics application and the relevant contextual factors of the setting need to be delineated and appreciated. This paper defines biopharmaceutical bioethics as: the application of bioethics norms (concepts, principles, and rules) to the research, development, supply, commercialization, and clinical use of biopharmaceutical healthcare products. It provides commentary on this definition, and presents five contextual factors that need to be considered when applying bioethics norms to a biopharmaceutical industry setting: (1) dual missions; (2) timely and pragmatic guidance; (3) resource stewardship; (4) multiple stakeholders; and (5) operational complexity.ConclusionUnderstanding the scope of the biopharmaceutical enterprise and contextual factors of a biopharmaceutical industry setting is foundational for the application of bioethics norms. Establishing a common language and approach for biopharmaceutical bioethics will facilitate breadth and depth of discussion and subsequent implementation to benefit patients, the healthcare system and society. (shrink)
- The Phenomenal Basis of Intentionality.Angela A. Mendelovici -2018 - New York, USA: Oxford University Press.Some mental states seem to be "of" or "about" things, or to "say" something. For example, a thought might represent that grass is green, and a visual experience might represent a blue cup. This is intentionality. The aim of this book is to explain this phenomenon. -/- Once we understand intentionality as a phenomenon to be explained, rather than a posit in a theory explaining something else, we can see that there are glaring empirical and in principle difficulties with currently (...) popular tracking and functional role theories of intentionality, which aim to account for intentionality in terms of tracking relations and functional roles. -/- This book develops an alternative theory, the phenomenal intentionality theory (PIT), on which the source of intentionality is none other than phenomenal consciousness, the subjective, felt, or qualitative aspect of mental life. While PIT avoids the problems that plague tracking and functional role theories, it faces its own challenges in accounting for the rich and complex contents of thoughts and the contents of nonconscious states. In responding to these challenges, this book proposes a novel version of PIT, on which all intentionality is phenomenal intentionality, though we in some sense represent many non-phenomenal contents by ascribing them to ourselves. This book further argues that phenomenal consciousness is an intrinsic feature of mental life, resulting in a view that is radically internalistic in spirit: Our phenomenally represented contents are literally in our heads, and any non-phenomenal contents we in some sense represent are expressly targeted by us. (shrink)
- Consciousness and Intentionality.Angela Mendelovici &David Bourget -2020 - In Uriah Kriegel,The Oxford Handbook of the Philosophy of Consciousness. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 560-585.Philosophers traditionally recognize two main features of mental states: intentionality and phenomenal consciousness. To a first approximation, intentionality is the aboutness of mental states, and phenomenal consciousness is the felt, experiential, qualitative, or "what it's like" aspect of mental states. In the past few decades, these features have been widely assumed to be distinct and independent. But several philosophers have recently challenged this assumption, arguing that intentionality and consciousness are importantly related. This article overviews the key views on the relationship (...) between consciousness and intentionality and describes our favored view, which is a version of the phenomenal intentionality theory, roughly the view that the most fundamental kind of intentionality arises from phenomenal consciousness. (shrink)
- Consent and the ethical duty to participate in health data research.Angela Ballantyne &G. Owen Schaefer -2018 -Journal of Medical Ethics 44 (6):392-396.The predominant view is that a study using health data is observational research and should require individual consent unless it can be shown that gaining consent is impractical. But recent arguments have been made that citizens have an ethical obligation to share their health information for research purposes. In our view, this obligation is sufficient ground to expand the circumstances where secondary use research with identifiable health information is permitted without explicit subject consent. As such, for some studies the Institutional (...) Review Board/Research Ethics Committee review process should not assess the practicality of gaining consent for data use. Instead the review process should focus on assessing the public good of the research, public engagement and transparency. (shrink)
- Our World Isn't Organized into Levels.Angela Potochnik -2021 - In Daniel Stephen Brooks, James DiFrisco & William C. Wimsatt,Levels of Organization in the Biological Sciences. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Levels of organization and their use in science have received increased philosophical attention of late, including challenges to the well-foundedness or widespread usefulness of levels concepts. One kind of response to these challenges has been to advocate a more precise and specific levels concept that is coherent and useful. Another kind of response has been to argue that the levels concept should be taken as a heuristic, to embrace its ambiguity and the possibility of exceptions as acceptable consequences of its (...) usefulness. In this chapter, I suggest that each of these strategies faces its own attendant downsides, and that pursuit of both strategies (by different thinkers) compounds the difficulties. That both kinds of approaches are advocated is, I think, illustrative of the problems plaguing the concept of levels of organization. I end by suggesting that the invocation of levels may mislead scientific and philosophical investigations more than it informs them, so our use of the levels concept should be updated accordingly. (shrink)
- How should we think about clinical data ownership?Angela Ballantyne -2020 -Journal of Medical Ethics 46 (5):289-294.The concept of ‘ownership’ is increasingly central to debates, in the media, health policy and bioethics, about the appropriate management of clinical data. I argue that the language of ownership acts as a metaphor and reflects multiple concerns about current data use and the disenfranchisement of citizens and collectives in the existing data ecosystem. But exactly which core interests and concerns ownership claims allude to remains opaque. Too often, we jump straight from ‘ownership’ to ‘private property’ and conclude ‘the data (...) belongs to the patient’. I will argue here that private property is only one type of relevant relationship between people, communities and data. There are several reasons to doubt that conceptualising data as private property presents a compelling response to concerns about clinical data ownership. In particular I argue that clinical data are co-constructed, so a property account would fail to confer exclusive rights to the patient. A non-property account of ownership acknowledges that the data are ‘about the patient’, and therefore the patient has relevant interests, without jumping to the conclusion that the data ‘belongs to the patient’. On this broader account of ownership, the relevant harm is the severing of the connection between the patient and their data, and the solution is to re-engage and re-connect patients to the data research enterprise. (shrink)
- How to Do Research Fairly in an Unjust World.Angela J. Ballantyne -2010 -American Journal of Bioethics 10 (6):26-35.International research, sponsored by for-profit companies, is regularly criticised as unethical on the grounds that it exploits research subjects in developing countries. Many commentators agree that exploitation occurs when the benefits of cooperative activity are unfairly distributed between the parties. To determine whether international research is exploitative we therefore need an account of fair distribution. Procedural accounts of fair bargaining have been popular solutions to this problem, but I argue that they are insufficient to protect against exploitation. I argue instead (...) that a maximin principle of fair distribution provides a more compelling normative account of fairness in relationships characterised by extreme vulnerability and inequality of bargaining potential between the parties. A global tax on international research would provide a mechanism for implementing the maximin account of fair benefits. This model has the capacity to ensure fair benefits and thereby prevent exploitation in international research. (shrink)
- Propositionalism Without Propositions, Objectualism Without Objects.Angela Mendelovici -2018 - In Alex Grzankowski & Michelle Montague,Non-Propositional Intentionality. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. pp. 214-233.Propositionalism is the view that all intentional states are propositional states, which are states with a propositional content, while objectualism is the view that at least some intentional states are objectual states, which are states with objectual contents, such as objects, properties, and kinds. This paper argues that there are two distinct ways of understanding propositionalism and objectualism: (1) as views about the deep nature of the contents of intentional states, and (2) as views about the superficial character of the (...) contents of intentional states. I argue that we should understand the views in the second way. I also argue that the propositionalism debate is fairly independent from debates over the deep nature of intentionality, and that this has implications for arguments for propositionalism and objectualism from claims about the nature of intentional content. I close with a short discussion of how related points apply to the debate over singular content. (shrink)
- Situational strategies for self-control.Angela Duckworth,Tamar Gendler &James Gross -2016 -Perspectives on Psychological Science 11 (1):35–55.No categories
- Scientific Explanation: Putting Communication First.Angela Potochnik -2016 -Philosophy of Science 83 (5):721-732.Scientific explanations must bear the proper relationship to the world: they must depict what, out in the world, is responsible for the explanandum. But explanations must also bear the proper relationship to their audience: they must be able to create human understanding. With few exceptions, philosophical accounts of explanation either ignore entirely the relationship between explanations and their audience or else demote this consideration to an ancillary role. In contrast, I argue that considering an explanation’s communicative role is crucial to (...) any satisfactory account of explanation. (shrink)
- Panpsychism’s Combination Problem Is a Problem for Everyone.Angela Mendelovici -2019 - In William Seager,The Routledge Handbook of Panpsychism. Routledge. pp. 303-316.The most pressing worry for panpsychism is arguably the combination problem, the problem of intelligibly explaining how the experiences of microphysical entities combine to form the experiences of macrophysical entities such as ourselves. This chapter argues that the combination problem is similar in kind to other problems of mental combination that are problems for everyone: the problem of phenomenal unity, the problem of mental structure, and the problem of new quality spaces. The ubiquity of combination problems suggests the ignorance hypothesis, (...) the hypothesis that we are ignorant of certain key facts about mental combination, which allows the panpsychist to avoid certain objections based on the combination problem. (shrink)
- Immediate and Reflective Senses.Angela Mendelovici -2019 - In Dena Shottenkirk, Manuel Curado & Steven S. Gouveia,Perception, Cognition and Aesthetics. New York: Routledge. pp. 187-209.This paper argues that there are two distinct kinds of senses, immediate senses and reflective senses. Immediate senses are what we are immediately aware of when we are in an intentional mental state, while reflective senses are what we understand of an intentional mental state's (putative) referent upon reflection. I suggest an account of immediate and reflective senses that is based on the phenomenal intentionality theory, a theory of intentionality in terms of phenomenal consciousness. My focus is on the immediate (...) and reflective senses of thoughts and the concepts they involve, but it also applies to other mental instances of intentionality. (shrink)
- Benefits to research subjects in international trials: Do they reduce exploitation or increase undue inducement?Angela Ballantyne -2006 -Developing World Bioethics 8 (3):178-191.There is an alleged tension between undue inducement and exploitation in research trials. This paper considers claims that increasing the benefits to research subjects enrolled in international, externally-sponsored clinical trials should be avoided on the grounds that it may result in the undue inducement of research subjects. This article contributes to the debate about exploitation versus undue inducement by introducing an analysis of the available empirical research into research participants' motivations and the influence of payments on research subjects' behaviour and (...) risk assessment. Admittedly, the available research in this field is limited, but the research that has been conducted suggests that financial rewards do not distort research subjects' behaviour or blind them to the risks involved with research. Therefore, I conclude that research sponsors should prioritise the prevention of exploitation in international research by providing greater benefits to research participants. (edited). (shrink)
- Adjusting the focus: A public health ethics approach to data research.Angela Ballantyne -2019 -Bioethics 33 (3):357-366.This paper contends that a research ethics approach to the regulation of health data research is unhelpful in the era of population‐level research and big data because it results in a primary focus on consent (meta‐, broad, dynamic and/or specific consent). Two recent guidelines – the 2016 WMA Declaration of Taipei on ethical considerations regarding health databases and biobanks and the revised CIOMS International ethical guidelines for health‐related research involving humans – both focus on the growing reliance on health data (...) for research. But as research ethics documents, they remain (to varying degrees) focused on consent and individual control of data use. Many current and future uses of health data make individual consent impractical, if not impossible. Many of the risks of secondary data use apply to communities and stakeholders rather than individual data subjects. Shifting from a research ethics perspective to a public health lens brings a different set of issues into view: how are the benefits and burdens of data use distributed, how can data research empower communities, who has legitimate decision‐making capacity? I propose that a public health ethics framework – based on public benefit, proportionality, equity, trust and accountability – provides more appropriate tools for assessing the ethical uses of health data. The main advantage of a public health approach for data research is that it is more likely to foster debate about power, justice and equity and to highlight the complexity of deciding when data use is in the public interest. (shrink)
- ‘Fair benefits’ accounts of exploitation require a normative principle of fairness: Response to Gbadegesin and Wendler, and Emanuel et al.Angela Ballantyne -2008 -Bioethics 22 (4):239–244.In 2004 Emanuel et al. published an influential account of exploitation in international research, which has become known as the 'fair benefits account'. In this paper I argue that the thin definition of fairness presented by Emanuel et al, and subsequently endorsed by Gbadegesin and Wendler, does not provide a notion of fairness that is adequately robust to support a fair benefits account of exploitation. The authors present a procedural notion of fairness – the fair distribution of the benefits of (...) research is to be determined on a case-by-case basis by the parties involved in each study. The fairness of the distribution of benefits is not assessed against an independent normative standard. Emanuel et al.'s account of fairness provides a framework for objecting only to transactions that occur without the fully informed consent of the weaker party. As a result, a debate about exploitation collapses into a debate about consent. This is problematic because, as the proponents of the fair benefits framework acknowledge, neither the trial participants' consent nor the host community's consent preclude exploitation. Attempts to stipulate normative standards of fairness to protect research subjects in developing countries have been controversial and divisive, and it is therefore understandable that bioethicists would be tempted to develop accounts of exploitation that are independent of such prescriptive principles. I conclude, however, that the utility of the fair benefits model of exploitation as a policy tool will ultimately depend on whether a substantive principle of fairness can be developed to underpin it. (shrink)
- Eight Other Questions about Explanation.Angela Potochnik -2018 - In Alexander Reutlinger & Juha Saatsi,Explanation Beyond Causation: Philosophical Perspectives on Non-Causal Explanations. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.The tremendous philosophical focus on how to characterize explanatory metaphysical dependence has eclipsed a number of other unresolved issued about scientific explanation. The purpose of this paper is taxonomical. I will outline a number of other questions about the nature of explanation and its role in science—eight, to be precise—and argue that each is independent. All of these topics have received some philosophical attention, but none nearly so much as it deserves. Furthermore, existing views on these topics have been obscured (...) by not distinguishing among these independent questions and, especially, by not separating them from the question of what metaphysical dependence relation is explanatory. Philosophical analysis of scientific explanation would be much improved by attending more carefully to these, and probably still other, elements of an account of explanation. (shrink)
- Hiv international clinical research: Exploitation and risk.Angela Ballantyne -2005 -Bioethics 19 (5-6):476-491.This paper aims to show that to reduce the level of exploitation present in (some) international clinical trials, research sponsors must aim to provide both an ex-ante expected gain in utility and a fair ex-post distribution of benefits for research subjects. I suggest the following principles of fair risk distribution in international research as the basis of a normative definition of fairness: (a) Persons should not be forced (by circumstance) to gamble in order to achieve or protect basic goods; (b) (...) In cases where one party is gambling with basic goods and the other party is not, the distribution of benefits and burdens must be arranged so that they are of greatest benefit to the worst off; (c) In relationships where one party is gambling for basic goods and the other party is not, the party gambling for basic goods must be assured of some guaranteed benefits in addition to the chance of gaining some potential benefits.These principles are applied to the case of HIV international research. I conclude that the research (as described) is mutually advantageous but still exploitative because the distribution of surplus benefits is unfair. It is unfair because research subjects are gambling with and for basic goods but they are not assured of a fair ex-post distribution of benefits. Principles (b) and (c) are not satisfied. Research participants are not accorded enough guaranteed benefits to outweigh the risks they undertake. (shrink)
- How Reliably Misrepresenting Olfactory Experiences Justify True Beliefs.Angela Mendelovici -2020 - In Dimitria Gatzia & Berit Brogaard,The Epistemology of Non-visual Perception. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press. pp. 99-117.This chapter argues that olfactory experiences represent either everyday objects or ad hoc olfactory objects as having primitive olfactory properties, which happen to be uninstantiated. On this picture, olfactory experiences reliably misrepresent: they falsely represent everyday objects or ad hoc objects as having properties they do not have, and they misrepresent in the same way on multiple occasions. One might worry that this view is incompatible with the plausible claim that olfactory experiences at least sometimes justify true beliefs about the (...) world. This chapter argues that there is no such incompatibility. Since olfactory experiences reliably misrepresent, they can lead to true and justified beliefs about putatively smelly objects. (shrink)
- Good Data.Angela Daly,Monique Mann &S. Kate Devitt -2019 - Amsterdam, Netherlands: Institute of Network Cultures.Moving away from the strong body of critique of pervasive ‘bad data’ practices by both governments and private actors in the globalized digital economy, this book aims to paint an alternative, more optimistic but still pragmatic picture of the datafied future. The authors examine and propose ‘good data’ practices, values and principles from an interdisciplinary, international perspective. From ideas of data sovereignty and justice, to manifestos for change and calls for activism, this collection opens a multifaceted conversation on the kinds (...) of futures we want to see, and presents concrete steps on how we can start realizing good data in practice. (shrink)
- In defence of a broad approach to public interest in health data research.Angela Ballantyne &G. Owen Schaefer -2021 -Journal of Medical Ethics 47 (8):583-584.In their response to ‘Public interest in health data research: laying out the conceptual groundwork’, Grewal and Newson critique us for inattention to the law and putting forward an impracticably broad conceptual understanding of public interest. While we agree more work is needed to generate a workable framework for Institutional Review Boards/Research Ethics Committees, we would contend that this should be grounded on a broad conception of public interest. This broadness facilitates regulatory agility, and is already reflected by some current (...) frameworks such as that found in the guidelines approved under Australia’s Privacy Act. It remains unclear which elements of our broad account Grewal and Newson would reject, or indeed where the substantive disagreement with our position lies. (shrink)
- Racialized punishment and prison abolition.Angela Y. Davis -2003 - In Tommy Lee Lott & John P. Pittman,A Companion to African-American Philosophy. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
- Competence and trust guardians as key elements of building trust in east-west joint ventures in russia.Angela Ayios -2003 -Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 12 (2):190–202.This paper summarises the author 's doctoral research on the development of interpersonal/interorganisational trust in relationships between expatriate and Russian staff working in east‐west enterprises in Russia. There is strong evidence from a variety of researchers to suggest that in order for western businesses investing in Russia to succeed, the dif.cult process of building trust needs to be understood and managed since in the Russian business climate western standards and norms of ethical business have not yet been established. According to (...) research.ndings, western investors doing business in Russia and the long‐term, personal trust that characterises family and friend relationships more congenial and more productive than formal, arm's‐length contacts and contracts. In such a context, it becomes important to identify what creates and destroys trust in the post‐Soviet business environment. This paper describes the causal factors leading to trust or lack of trust in relationships within western‐invested strategic alliances in Russia. The key relationship under consideration is the one between expatriate western staff and managers seconded to the venture on the one hand, and their local Russian staff, counterparts and superiors on the other. (shrink)
- Stigma and the politics of biomedical models of mental illness.Angela K. Thachuk -2011 -International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 4 (1):140-163.This paper offers a critical analysis of the strategic use of biomedical models of mental illness as a means of challenging stigma. Likening mental illnesses to physical illnesses (1) reinforces notions that persons with mental illnesses are of a fundamentally “different kind,” (2) entrenches misperceptions that they are inherently more violent, and (3) promotes overreliance on diagnostic labeling and pharmaceutical treatments. I conclude that too much has been invested in the claim that the body is somehow morally neutral, and that (...) advocates of this approach oversimplify, misrepresent, and underestimate the personal and social costs of physical illness. (shrink)
- On Respecting Animals, or Can Animals be Wronged Without Being Harmed?Angela K. Martin -2019 -Res Publica 25 (1):83-99.There is broad agreement that humans can be wronged independently of their incurring any harm, that is, when their welfare is not affected. Examples include unnoticed infringements of privacy, ridiculing unaware individuals, or disregarding individuals’ autonomous decision-making in their best interest. However, it is less clear whether the same is true of animals—that is, whether moral agents can wrong animals in situations that do not involve any harm to the animals concerned. In order to answer this question, I concentrate on (...) the illustrative case of treating animals in a demeaning yet harmless way that would be disrespectful if humans were concerned. I discuss whether such actions are permissible or unjustifiably discriminatory from a moral point of view. I conclude that moral agents cannot directly wrong animals without harming them and thus do not owe it to a particular animal to refrain from such actions. However, if the actions increase the likelihood that animal abuse will occur, this presents a strong indirect reason against performing them. Thus, the reasons for refraining from such actions are merely indirect rather than direct. (shrink)
- The Beauty of Science without the Science of Beauty: Kant and the Rationalists on the Aesthetics of Cognition.Angela Breitenbach -2018 -Journal of the History of Philosophy 56 (2):281-304.it is common to praise the beauty of theories, the elegance of proofs, and the pleasing simplicity of explanations. We may admire, for example, the beauty of Einstein’s theory of general relativity, the simplicity of Darwin’s idea of natural selection, and the elegance of a geometrical proof of Pythagoras’s theorem. Aesthetic judgments such as these have much currency among scientists, and they are employed in the search for knowledge more broadly. But while the use of aesthetic judgments in science is (...) widespread, it is not uncontroversial.1 On one side, such judgments are often inspired by the Platonic vision that beauty and truth are ultimately one. As Henri Poincaré saw it, science is the “disinterested pursuit... (shrink)
- Critical Refusals and Occupy.Angela Y. Davis -2013 -Radical Philosophy Review 16 (2):425-439.
- Data and tissue research without patient consent: A qualitative study of the views of research ethics committees in New Zealand.Angela Ballantyne &Andrew Moore -2018 -AJOB Empirical Bioethics 9 (3):143-153.No categories
- Exploitation in Cross-Border Reproductive Care.Angela Ballantyne -2014 -International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 7 (2):75-99.Concerns about exploitation pervade the literature on commercial cross-border reproductive care, particularly egg selling and surrogacy. But what constitutes exploitation, and what moral weight does it have? I consider the relationship between vulnerability, limited choice, consent, and mutually advantageous exploitation. To elucidate the difference between limited choice and consent, I draw on an account of relational autonomy. In the absence of a normative principle of fair distribution, it is unclear whether the providers of reproductive goods and services are treated fairly (...) in such contracts, and therefore whether they have been exploited. I finish with some pragmatic recommendations for minimizing risks and empowering egg sellers and surrogates. (shrink)
- The Natural Sciences in The Schools: Tension in the Modernization Process of Argentine Society (1870–1960).Silvina Gvirtz,Angela Aisenstein,Jorge N. Cornejo &Alejandra Aalerani -2001 -Science & Education 10 (6):545-558.No categories
- Unmaking Race, Remaking Soul: Transformative Aesthetics and the Practice of Freedom.Christa Davis Acampora &Angela L. Cotten (eds.) -2007 - State University of New York Press.Explores the theme of aesthetic agency and its potential for social and political progress.
- Who we are and how we learn: educational engagement and justice for diverse learners.Jose W. Lalas,Angela Macias,Kitty M. Fortner,Nirmla Griarte Flores,Ayanna Blackmon-Balogun &Margarita Vance (eds.) -2016 - United States of America: Cognella Academic Publishing.The text serves as an education program handbook for understanding the complexities of student engagement and providing access, equity, and justice for learners, with an emphasis on students with diverse backgrounds. The book examines current research and best practices on engagement for these learners and explores educational issues through social, cultural, and racial lenses.
- An abstract dynamic access control architecture.Chuchang Liu,Angela Billard &Benjamin Long -2011 -Journal of Applied Logic 9 (4):239-249.
- Husserl and Frege on Schröder.Angela Schneider O’Connell -1988 -Études Phénoménologiques 4 (8):91-125.
- Section 3: Of Justice.Andrew Valls &Angela Coventry -2018 - In Angela Coventry & Andrew Valls,_David Hume on Morals, Politics, and Society_. New Haven [Connecticut]: Yale University Press. pp. 13-29.
- Marcuse's legacies.Angela Y. Davis -2004 - In John Abromeit & William Mark Cobb,Herbert Marcuse: a critical reader. New York: Routledge.
- Ten Questions Institutional Review Boards Should Ask When Reviewing International Clinical Research Protocols.Daniel W. Fitzgerald,Angela Wasunna &Jean William Pape -2003 -IRB: Ethics & Human Research 25 (2):14.
- Plant Ethics: Concepts and Applications.Angela Kallhoff,Marcello Di Paola &Maria Schörgenhumer (eds.) -2018 - Routledge.Large parts of our world are filled with plants, and human life depends on, interacts with, affects and is affected by plant life in various ways. Yet plants have not received nearly as much attention from philosophers and ethicists as they deserve. In environmental philosophy, plants are often swiftly subsumed under the categories of "all living things" and rarely considered thematically. There is a need for developing a more sophisticated theoretical understanding of plants and their practical role in human experience. (...) Plant Ethics: Concepts and Applications aims at opening a philosophical discussion that may begin to fill that gap. The book investigates issues in plants ontology, ethics and the role of plants and their cultivation in various fields of application. It explores and develops important concepts to shape and frame plants-related philosophical questions accurately, including new ideas of how to address moral questions when confronted with plants in concrete scenarios. This edited volume brings together for the first time, and in an interdisciplinary spirit, contemporary approaches to plant ethics by international scholars of established reputation. It will be of great interest to students and scholars of Philosophy and Ethics. (shrink)No categories
- The Trouble with Tolerance.Angela M. Smith -2011 - In R. Jay Wallace, Rahul Kumar & Samuel Freeman,Reasons and Recognition: Essays on the Philosophy of T.M. Scanlon. , US: Oxford University Press USA. pp. 179-199.
- Ripensando l'umano: in dialogo con Edith Stein.Angela Ales Bello &Nicola Zippel (eds.) -2015 - Roma: Castelvecchi.No categories
- Ragione pratica, libertà, normatività.Angela Ales Bello -1989 -Idee 12:131-136.
- PBL effectiveness, tensions, and practitioner implications.Johannes Strobel &Angela van Barneveld -2015 - In Andrew Walker, Heather Leary & Cindy E. Hmelo-Silver,Essential readings in problem-based learning. West Lafayette, Indiana: Purdue University Press.Export citation
Bookmark - Introduction.Angela Ballantyne,Belinda Bennett,Isabel Karpin &Wendy Rogers -2008 -International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 1 (2):1-4.
- Edith Stein, Hedwig Conrad-Martius, Gerda Walther: fenomenologia della persona, della vita e della comunità.Angela Ales Bello,Francesco Alfieri &Mobeen Shahid (eds.) -2011 - Bari: G. Laterza.No categories
- Discursos de género: el modelo de la igualdad en la diferencia.Ángela Aparisi Miralles -2016 -Arbor 192 (778):a303.No categories
- Texturen der Macht: 500 Jahre "Il Principe".Judith Frömmer,Angela Oster &Albert Russell Ascoli (eds.) -2015 - Berlin: Kulturverlag Kadmos.
- Introduzione.Carlo Grassi &Angela Condello -2017 -Rivista di Estetica 65:3-6.L’idea di ritornare a dialogare sul tema del giudizio è nata da alcune letture fatte prima a Parigi e poi a Roma. Ripartendo in particolare da un convegno tenutosi a Cerisy-La Salle – di cui pubblichiamo in questo volume gli interventi Judicieux dans le différend, di Jean-François Lyotard, e Dies Irae, di Jean-Luc Nancy – abbiamo deciso di riprendere quel dibattito per rispondere, in primo luogo, all’interesse crescente delle scienze umane per i temi del diritto e della giustizia; nonché, in...
- Superteachrs: From Policy Towards Practice.Alan Sutton,Angela Wortley,Jenny Harrison &Christine Wise -2000 -British Journal of Educational Studies 48 (4):413-428.This article is concerned with the origins and evolution of the Advanced Skills Teacher initiative from its announcement in 1995 to the end of 1999. It examines the Government rationale and the contributions of the Department for Education and Employment, the Teacher Training Agency and the School Teachers' Review Body.
- From peripheral to central, the story of Melanie's metamorphosis in an urban middle school science class.Edna Tan &Angela Calabrese Barton -2008 -Science Education 92 (4):567-590.Export citation Bookmark
- A Dialogue.Andrew Valls &Angela Coventry -2018 - In Angela Coventry & Andrew Valls,_David Hume on Morals, Politics, and Society_. New Haven [Connecticut]: Yale University Press. pp. 117-131.
- Section 7: Of Qualities Immediately Agreeable to Ourselves.Andrew Valls &Angela Coventry -2018 - In Angela Coventry & Andrew Valls,_David Hume on Morals, Politics, and Society_. New Haven [Connecticut]: Yale University Press. pp. 63-70.
| 1 — 50 / 984 |
Off-campus access
Using PhilPapers from home?
Create an account to enable off-campus access through your institution's proxy server or OpenAthens.
Monitor this page
Be alerted of all new items appearing on this page. Choose how you want to monitor it:
 Email |  RSS feed |
Editorial team
General Editors:
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Area Editors:
David Bourget
Gwen Bradford
Berit Brogaard
Margaret Cameron
David Chalmers
James Chase
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Esa Diaz-Leon
Barry Hallen
Hans Halvorson
Jonathan Ichikawa
Monte Johnson
Michelle Kosch
Øystein Linnebo
Paul Livingston
Brandon Look
Manolo Martínez
Matthew McGrath
Michiru Nagatsu
Susana Nuccetelli
Giuseppe Primiero
Jack Alan Reynolds
Darrell P. Rowbottom
Aleksandra Samonek
Constantine Sandis
Howard Sankey
Jonathan Schaffer
Thomas Senor
Daniel Star
Jussi Suikkanen
Aness Kim Webster
Other editors
Contact us
Learn more about PhilPapers
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Area Editors:
David Bourget
Gwen Bradford
Berit Brogaard
Margaret Cameron
David Chalmers
James Chase
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Esa Diaz-Leon
Barry Hallen
Hans Halvorson
Jonathan Ichikawa
Monte Johnson
Michelle Kosch
Øystein Linnebo
Paul Livingston
Brandon Look
Manolo Martínez
Matthew McGrath
Michiru Nagatsu
Susana Nuccetelli
Giuseppe Primiero
Jack Alan Reynolds
Darrell P. Rowbottom
Aleksandra Samonek
Constantine Sandis
Howard Sankey
Jonathan Schaffer
Thomas Senor
Daniel Star
Jussi Suikkanen
Aness Kim Webster
Other editors
Contact us
Learn more about PhilPapers
Home |New books and articles |Bibliographies |Philosophy journals |About PhilPapers |API |Contact us |Code of conduct
PhilPapers logo byAndrea Andrews andMeghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see ourterms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications).Use of this site is subject toterms & conditions.
All rights reserved byThe PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-54b44b69b7-sq5lk uwo