Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


PhilPapersPhilPeoplePhilArchivePhilEventsPhilJobs
Order:

1 filter applied
  1. (1 other version)The ethics of algorithms: key problems and solutions.Andreas Tsamados,Nikita Aggarwal,Josh Cowls,Jessica Morley,Huw Roberts,Mariarosaria Taddeo &Luciano Floridi -2021 -AI and Society.
    Research on the ethics of algorithms has grown substantially over the past decade. Alongside the exponential development and application of machine learning algorithms, new ethical problems and solutions relating to their ubiquitous use in society have been proposed. This article builds on a review of the ethics of algorithms published in 2016, 2016). The goals are to contribute to the debate on the identification and analysis of the ethical implications of algorithms, to provide an updated analysis of epistemic and normative (...) concerns, and to offer actionable guidance for the governance of the design, development and deployment of algorithms. (shrink)
    Direct download(3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   50 citations  
  2.  80
    (2 other versions)The AI gambit: leveraging artificial intelligence to combat climate change—opportunities, challenges, and recommendations.Josh Cowls,Andreas Tsamados,Mariarosaria Taddeo &Luciano Floridi -2021 -AI and Society:1-25.
    In this article, we analyse the role that artificial intelligence (AI) could play, and is playing, to combat global climate change. We identify two crucial opportunities that AI offers in this domain: it can help improve and expand current understanding of climate change, and it can contribute to combatting the climate crisis effectively. However, the development of AI also raises two sets of problems when considering climate change: the possible exacerbation of social and ethical challenges already associated with AI, and (...) the contribution to climate change of the greenhouse gases emitted by training data and computation-intensive AI systems. We assess the carbon footprint of AI research, and the factors that influence AI’s greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in this domain. We find that the carbon footprint of AI research may be significant and highlight the need for more evidence concerning the trade-off between the GHG emissions generated by AI research and the energy and resource efficiency gains that AI can offer. In light of our analysis, we argue that leveraging the opportunities offered by AI for global climate change whilst limiting its risks is a gambit which requires responsive, evidence-based, and effective governance to become a winning strategy. We conclude by identifying the European Union as being especially well-placed to play a leading role in this policy response and provide 13 recommendations that are designed to identify and harness the opportunities of AI for combatting climate change, while reducing its impact on the environment. (shrink)
    Direct download(3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  3.  47
    Achieving a ‘Good AI Society’: Comparing the Aims and Progress of the EU and the US.Huw Roberts,Josh Cowls,Emmie Hine,Francesca Mazzi,Andreas Tsamados,Mariarosaria Taddeo &Luciano Floridi -2021 -Science and Engineering Ethics 27 (6):1-25.
    Over the past few years, there has been a proliferation of artificial intelligence strategies, released by governments around the world, that seek to maximise the benefits of AI and minimise potential harms. This article provides a comparative analysis of the European Union and the United States’ AI strategies and considers the visions of a ‘Good AI Society’ that are forwarded in key policy documents and their opportunity costs, the extent to which the implementation of each vision is living up to (...) stated aims and the consequences that these differing visions of a ‘Good AI Society’ have for transatlantic cooperation. The article concludes by comparing the ethical desirability of each vision and identifies areas where the EU, and especially the US, need to improve in order to achieve ethical outcomes and deepen cooperation. (shrink)
    Direct download(3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  4.  56
    The case for a broader approach to AI assurance: addressing “hidden” harms in the development of artificial intelligence.Christopher Thomas,Huw Roberts,Jakob Mökander,Andreas Tsamados,Mariarosaria Taddeo &Luciano Floridi -forthcoming -AI and Society:1-16.
    Artificial intelligence (AI) assurance is an umbrella term describing many approaches—such as impact assessment, audit, and certification procedures—used to provide evidence that an AI system is legal, ethical, and technically robust. AI assurance approaches largely focus on two overlapping categories of harms: deployment harms that emerge at, or after, the point of use, and individual harms that directly impact a person as an individual. Current approaches generally overlook upstream collective and societal harms associated with the development of systems, such as (...) resource extraction and processing, exploitative labour practices and energy intensive model training. Thus, the scope of current AI assurance practice is insufficient for ensuring that AI is ethical in a holistic sense, i.e. in ways that are legally permissible, socially acceptable, economically viable and environmentally sustainable. This article addresses this shortcoming by arguing for a broader approach to AI assurance that is sensitive to the full scope of AI development and deployment harms. To do so, the article maps harms related to AI and highlights three examples of harmful practices that occur upstream in the AI supply chain and impact the environment, labour, and data exploitation. It then reviews assurance mechanisms used in adjacent industries to mitigate similar harms, evaluating their strengths, weaknesses, and how effectively they are being applied to AI. Finally, it provides recommendations as to how a broader approach to AI assurance can be implemented to mitigate harms more effectively across the whole AI supply chain. (shrink)
    Direct download(3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  5.  214
    Artificial intelligence in support of the circular economy: ethical considerations and a path forward.Huw Roberts,Joyce Zhang,Ben Bariach,Josh Cowls,Ben Gilburt,Prathm Juneja,Andreas Tsamados,Marta Ziosi,Mariarosaria Taddeo &Luciano Floridi -forthcoming -AI and Society:1-14.
    The world’s current model for economic development is unsustainable. It encourages high levels of resource extraction, consumption, and waste that undermine positive environmental outcomes. Transitioning to a circular economy (CE) model of development has been proposed as a sustainable alternative. Artificial intelligence (AI) is a crucial enabler for CE. It can aid in designing robust and sustainable products, facilitate new circular business models, and support the broader infrastructures needed to scale circularity. However, to date, considerations of the ethical implications of (...) using AI to achieve a transition to CE have been limited. This article addresses this gap. It outlines how AI is and can be used to transition towards CE, analyzes the ethical risks associated with using AI for this purpose, and supports some recommendations to policymakers and industry on how to minimise these risks. (shrink)
    Direct download(2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  6.  9
    Correction: The case for a broader approach to AI assurance: addressing “hidden” harms in the development of artificial intelligence.Christopher Thomas,Huw Roberts,Jakob Mökander,Andreas Tsamados,Mariarosaria Taddeo &Luciano Floridi -forthcoming -AI and Society:1-1.
  7. Vodafone Institute for Society and Communications.Josh Cowls,Andreas Tsamados,Mariarosaria Taddeo &Luciano Floridi (eds.) -2021
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
Export
Limit to items.
Filters





Configure languageshere.Sign in to use this feature.

Viewing options


Open Category Editor
Off-campus access
Using PhilPapers from home?

Create an account to enable off-campus access through your institution's proxy server or OpenAthens.


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp