Works by Alice H. Eagly
12 found
Order:
1 filter applied
- Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders.Alice H. Eagly &Steven J. Karau -2002 -Psychological Review 109 (3):573-598.
- Editorial: Gender Roles in the Future? Theoretical Foundations and Future Research Directions.Alice H. Eagly &Sabine Sczesny -2019 -Frontiers in Psychology 10.
- Communicative Understandings of Women's Leadership Development: From Ceilings of Glass to Labyrinth Paths.Alice H. Eagly,Janie Harden Fritz,Tamara L. Burke,Ned S. Laff,Erin L. Payseur,Diane A. Forbes Berthoud,Sheri A. Whalen,Amy C. Branam,Nathalie Duval-Couetil,Rebecca L. Dohrman,Jenna Stephenson,Melissa Wood Alemá,Jennifer A. Malkowski,Cara Jacocks,Tracey Quigley Holden &Sandra L. French (eds.) -2011 - Lexington Books.Communicative Understandings of Women's Leadership Development: From Ceilings of Glass to Labyrinth Paths, edited by Elesha L. Ruminski and Annette M. Holba, weaves the disciplines of communication studies, leadership studies, and women's studies to offer theoretical and practical reflection about women's leadership development in academic, organizational, and political contexts. This work claims a space for women's leadership studies and acknowledges the paradigmatic shift from discussing women's leadership using the glass ceiling to what Eagly and Carli identify as the labyrinth of (...) leadership. (shrink)
- Do Don juans have better genes than family men?Alice H. Eagly -2000 -Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):601-602.An alternative interpretation of Gangestad & Simpson's findings features the assumption that only a subgroup of those men who are low in fluctuating asymmetry are typically available for short-term mating. In general, these philandering men do not offer higher genetic quality than men who are securely attached to long-term mates.
- Mischaracterizing social psychology to support the laudable goal of increasing its political diversity.Alice H. Eagly -2015 -Behavioral and Brain Sciences 38.Duarte et al.'s arguments for increasing political diversity in social psychology are based on mischaracterizations of social psychology as fundamentally flawed in understanding stereotype accuracy and the effects of attitudes on information processing. I correct their misunderstandings while agreeing with their view that political diversity, along with other forms of diversity, stands to benefit social psychology.
- Prejudice in context departs from attitudes toward groups.Alice H. Eagly &Amanda B. Diekman -2012 -Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (6):431-432.The analysis offered by Dixon et al. fails to acknowledge that the attitudes that drive prejudice are attitudes that are constructed in particular contexts. These attitudes can diverge strongly from attitudes toward the group in general. Social change is thus best achieved through challenging the requirements of roles and by changing group stereotypes.
- Sexual selection does not provide an adequate theory of sex differences in aggression.Alice H. Eagly &Wendy Wood -2009 -Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (3-4):276-277.Our social role/biosocial theory provides a more adequate account of aggression sex differences than does Archer's sexual selection theory. In our theory, these sex differences arise flexibly from sociocultural and ecological forces in interaction with humans' biology, as defined by female and male physical attributes and reproductive activities. Our comments elaborate our theory's explanations for the varied phenomena that Archer presents.
- The origins of aggression sex differences: Evolved dispositions versus social roles.Alice H. Eagly &Wendy Wood -1999 -Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (2):223-224.The ultimate causes of sex differences in human aggressive behavior can lie mainly in evolved, inherited mechanisms that differ by sex or mainly in the differing placement of women and men in the social structure. The present commentary contrasts Campbell's evolutionary interpretation of aggression sex differences with a social structural interpretation that encompasses a wider range of phenomena.
- The three ironies of the McGuires' theory of thought systems.Alice H. Eagly -1991 - In Robert S. Wyer & Thomas K. Srull,The Content, Structure, and Operation of Thought Systems. Lawrence Erlbaum. pp. 4--121.No categories
- Universal sex differences across patriarchal cultures [not equal] evolved psychological dispositions.Alice H. Eagly &Wendy Wood -2005 -Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (2):281-283.Schmitt's findings provide little evidence that sex differences in sociosexuality are explained by evolved dispositions. These sex differences are better explained by an evolutionary account that treats the psychological attributes of women and men as emergent, given the biological attributes of the sexes, especially female reproductive capacity, and the economic and social structural aspects of societies.
- Women take risks to help others to stay alive.Alice H. Eagly -2022 -Behavioral and Brain Sciences 45:e135.Evidence that women voluntarily expose themselves to some threats more than men do challenges the generalizability of the claim that women exceed men in self-protective responses. Examples include women's higher rates of living organ donation and rescuing Jews during the holocaust. In general, women's efforts to keep other people alive can take precedence over their efforts to protect themselves.
- Omitted evidence undermines sexual motives explanation for attractiveness bias.Marianne LaFrance &Alice H. Eagly -2017 -Behavioral and Brain Sciences 40.No categories
Off-campus access
Using PhilPapers from home?
Create an account to enable off-campus access through your institution's proxy server or OpenAthens.
Monitor this page
Be alerted of all new items appearing on this page. Choose how you want to monitor it:
 Email |  RSS feed |
Editorial team
General Editors:
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Area Editors:
David Bourget
Gwen Bradford
Berit Brogaard
Margaret Cameron
David Chalmers
James Chase
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Esa Diaz-Leon
Barry Hallen
Hans Halvorson
Jonathan Ichikawa
Monte Johnson
Michelle Kosch
Øystein Linnebo
Paul Livingston
Brandon Look
Manolo Martínez
Matthew McGrath
Michiru Nagatsu
Susana Nuccetelli
Giuseppe Primiero
Jack Alan Reynolds
Darrell P. Rowbottom
Aleksandra Samonek
Constantine Sandis
Howard Sankey
Jonathan Schaffer
Thomas Senor
Daniel Star
Jussi Suikkanen
Aness Kim Webster
Other editors
Contact us
Learn more about PhilPapers
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Area Editors:
David Bourget
Gwen Bradford
Berit Brogaard
Margaret Cameron
David Chalmers
James Chase
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Esa Diaz-Leon
Barry Hallen
Hans Halvorson
Jonathan Ichikawa
Monte Johnson
Michelle Kosch
Øystein Linnebo
Paul Livingston
Brandon Look
Manolo Martínez
Matthew McGrath
Michiru Nagatsu
Susana Nuccetelli
Giuseppe Primiero
Jack Alan Reynolds
Darrell P. Rowbottom
Aleksandra Samonek
Constantine Sandis
Howard Sankey
Jonathan Schaffer
Thomas Senor
Daniel Star
Jussi Suikkanen
Aness Kim Webster
Other editors
Contact us
Learn more about PhilPapers
Home |New books and articles |Bibliographies |Philosophy journals |About PhilPapers |API |Contact us |Code of conduct
PhilPapers logo byAndrea Andrews andMeghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see ourterms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications).Use of this site is subject toterms & conditions.
All rights reserved byThe PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-99fc7d78b-gd956 uwo