Results for 'A. F. Gibson'
956 found
Order:
1 filter applied
- The diffusion (nt, mobility and lifetime of minority carriers in germanium containing parallel arrays of dislocations.J. B. Arthur,A. F.Gibson,J. W. Granvtlle &E. G. S. Paige -1958 -Philosophical Magazine 3 (33):940-949.No categories
- An interpretation of certain transport properties in germanium containing parallel arrays or edge dislocations.A. F.Gibson &E. G. S. Paige -1958 -Philosophical Magazine 3 (33):950-960.No categories
- Anderson, JR, 313, 559.R. N. Aslin,D. H. Ballard,J. Berger,L. Boroditsky,C. R. Clark,T. Dartnall,S. Dennis,B. Galantucci,E. A. F.Gibson &R. L. Goldstone -2005 -Cognitive Science 29:1091.No categoriesExport citation
Bookmark - Looking beyond Popper: how philosophy can be relevant to ecology.Tina Heger,Alkistis Elliott-Graves,Marie I. Kaiser,Katie H. Morrow,William Bausman,Gregory P. Dietl,Carsten F. Dormann,David J.Gibson,James Griesemer,Yuval Itescu,Kurt Jax,Andrew M. Latimer,Chunlong Liu,Jostein Starrfelt,Philip A. Stephens &Jonathan M. Jeschke -2025 -Oikos 2025 (2):e10994.Current workflows in academic ecology rarely allow an engagement of ecologists with philosophers, or with contemporary philosophical work. We argue that this is a missed opportunity for enriching ecological reasoning and practice, because many questions in ecology overlap with philosophical questions and with current topics in contemporary philosophy of science. One obstacle to a closer connection and collaboration between the fields is the limited awareness of scientists, including ecologists, of current philosophical questions, developments and ideas. In this article, we aim (...) to overcome this obstacle and trigger more collaborations between ecologists and philosophers. First, we provide an overview of philosophical research relevant to ecologists. Second, we use examples to demonstrate that many ecological questions have a philosophical dimension and point to related philosophical work. We elaborate on one example – the debate around the appropriate level of complexity of ecological models – to show in more detail how philosophy can enrich ecology. Finally, we provide suggestions for how to initiate collaborative projects involving both ecologists and philosophers. (shrink)
- New books. [REVIEW]F. N. Hales,W. H. Fairbrother,F. C. S. Schiller,S. H.,A. E. Taylor,David Morrison,F. G. Nutt,B. Russell,W. R. BoyceGibson,C. A. F. Rhys Davids,B. W. &T. Loveday -1903 -Mind 12 (46):255-274.
- Promoting coherent minimum reporting guidelines for biological and biomedical investigations: the MIBBI project.Chris F. Taylor,Dawn Field,Susanna-Assunta Sansone,Jan Aerts,Rolf Apweiler,Michael Ashburner,Catherine A. Ball,Pierre-Alain Binz,Molly Bogue,Tim Booth,Alvis Brazma,Ryan R. Brinkman,Adam Michael Clark,Eric W. Deutsch,Oliver Fiehn,Jennifer Fostel,Peter Ghazal,FrankGibson,Tanya Gray,Graeme Grimes,John M. Hancock,Nigel W. Hardy,Henning Hermjakob,Randall K. Julian,Matthew Kane,Carsten Kettner,Christopher Kinsinger,Eugene Kolker,Martin Kuiper,Nicolas Le Novere,Jim Leebens-Mack,Suzanna E. Lewis,Phillip Lord,Ann-Marie Mallon,Nishanth Marthandan,Hiroshi Masuya,Ruth McNally,Alexander Mehrle,Norman Morrison,Sandra Orchard,John Quackenbush,James M. Reecy,Donald G. Robertson,Philippe Rocca-Serra,Henry Rodriguez,Heiko Rosenfelder,Javier Santoyo-Lopez,Richard H. Scheuermann,Daniel Schober,Barry Smith &Jason Snape -2008 -Nature Biotechnology 26 (8):889-896.Throughout the biological and biomedical sciences there is a growing need for, prescriptive ‘minimum information’ (MI) checklists specifying the key information to include when reporting experimental results are beginning to find favor with experimentalists, analysts, publishers and funders alike. Such checklists aim to ensure that methods, data, analyses and results are described to a level sufficient to support the unambiguous interpretation, sophisticated search, reanalysis and experimental corroboration and reuse of data sets, facilitating the extraction of maximum value from data sets (...) them. However, such ‘minimum information’ MI checklists are usually developed independently by groups working within representatives of particular biologically- or technologically-delineated domains. Consequently, an overview of the full range of checklists can be difficult to establish without intensive searching, and even tracking thetheir individual evolution of single checklists may be a non-trivial exercise. Checklists are also inevitably partially redundant when measured one against another, and where they overlap is far from straightforward. Furthermore, conflicts in scope and arbitrary decisions on wording and sub-structuring make integration difficult. This presents inhibit their use in combination. Overall, these issues present significant difficulties for the users of checklists, especially those in areas such as systems biology, who routinely combine information from multiple biological domains and technology platforms. To address all of the above, we present MIBBI (Minimum Information for Biological and Biomedical Investigations); a web-based communal resource for such checklists, designed to act as a ‘one-stop shop’ for those exploring the range of extant checklist projects, and to foster collaborative, integrative development and ultimately promote gradual integration of checklists. (shrink)
- New books. [REVIEW]S. H. Mellone,F. C. S. Schiller,T. Loveday,John Burnet,A. W. Benn,W. R. BoyceGibson &M. S. -1903 -Mind 12 (45):113-127.No categories
- Aeternitas: a Spinozistic Study. By H. F. Hallett. (Oxford: Clarendon Press. 1930. Pp. 344. Price 16s. net.).A. BoyceGibson -1933 -Philosophy 8 (29):99-.
- The Cambridge Companion to Quine.Roger F.Gibson (ed.) -2004 - New York: Cambridge University Press.W. V. Quine was quite simply the most distinguished analytic philosopher of the later half of the twentieth century. His celebrated attack on the analytic/synthetic tradition heralded a major shift away from the views of language descended from logical positivism. His most important book, Word and Object, introduced the concept of indeterminacy of radical translation, a bleak view of the nature of the language with which we ascribe thoughts and beliefs to ourselves and others. Quine is also famous for the (...) view that epistemology should be naturalized, that is conducted in a scientific spirit with the object of investigating the relationship between the inputs of experience and the outputs of belief. The eleven essays in this volume cover all the central topics of Quine's philosophy: the underdetermination of physical theory, analycity, naturalism, propositional attitudes, behaviorism, reference and ontology, positivism, holism and logic. (shrink)
- The Ontology for Biomedical Investigations.Anita Bandrowski,Ryan Brinkman,Mathias Brochhausen,Matthew H. Brush,Bill Bug,Marcus C. Chibucos,Kevin Clancy,Mélanie Courtot,Dirk Derom,Michel Dumontier,Liju Fan,Jennifer Fostel,Gilberto Fragoso,FrankGibson,Alejandra Gonzalez-Beltran,Melissa A. Haendel,Yongqun He,Mervi Heiskanen,Tina Hernandez-Boussard,Mark Jensen,Yu Lin,Allyson L. Lister,Phillip Lord,James Malone,Elisabetta Manduchi,Monnie McGee,Norman Morrison,James A. Overton,Helen Parkinson,Bjoern Peters,Philippe Rocca-Serra,Alan Ruttenberg,Susanna-Assunta Sansone,Richard H. Scheuermann,Daniel Schober,Barry Smith,Larisa N. Soldatova,Christian J. Stoeckert,Chris F. Taylor,Carlo Torniai,Jessica A. Turner,Randi Vita,Patricia L. Whetzel &Jie Zheng -2016 -PLoS ONE 11 (4):e0154556.The Ontology for Biomedical Investigations (OBI) is an ontology that provides terms with precisely defined meanings to describe all aspects of how investigations in the biological and medical domains are conducted. OBI re-uses ontologies that provide a representation of biomedical knowledge from the Open Biological and Biomedical Ontologies (OBO) project and adds the ability to describe how this knowledge was derived. We here describe the state of OBI and several applications that are using it, such as adding semantic expressivity to (...) existing databases, building data entry forms, and enabling interoperability between knowledge resources. OBI covers all phases of the investigation process, such as planning, execution and reporting. It represents information and material entities that participate in these processes, as well as roles and functions. Prior to OBI, it was not possible to use a single internally consistent resource that could be applied to multiple types of experiments for these applications. OBI has made this possible by creating terms for entities involved in biological and medical investigations and by importing parts of other biomedical ontologies such as GO, Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI) and Phenotype Attribute and Trait Ontology (PATO) without altering their meaning. OBI is being used in a wide range of projects covering genomics, multi-omics, immunology, and catalogs of services. OBI has also spawned other ontologies (Information Artifact Ontology) and methods for importing parts of ontologies (Minimum information to reference an external ontology term (MIREOT)). The OBI project is an open cross-disciplinary collaborative effort, encompassing multiple research communities from around the globe. To date, OBI has created 2366 classes and 40 relations along with textual and formal definitions. The OBI Consortium maintains a web resource providing details on the people, policies, and issues being addressed in association with OBI. (shrink)
- Perspectives on Quine.Robert B. Barrett &Roger F.Gibson (eds.) -1990 - Cambridge, Mass., USA: Blackwell.Perspectives on Quine, now available in paperback, is a collection of twenty-one new essays dealing with the thought of America's most distinguished living philosopher, Willard Van Orman Quine. After the editors' brief introduction to Quine's thought, the volume opens with an important new essay by Quine entitled Three Indeterminacies. The essays that follow, written by leading philosophers, are rich with insights into a wide variety of Quine's concerns ranging from logic and set theory to natural language, truth, evidence, natural kinds, (...) naturalized epistemology, and much more. Each essay concludes with a summary and response from Quine himself. (shrink)
- Inference to the Best Explanation. Philosophical Issues in Science. [REVIEW]Roger F.Gibson -1994 -Review of Metaphysics 48 (2):417-418.Lipton articulates and defends a partial description of a central mechanism of inductive inference: Inference to the Best Explanation. IBE "is widely supposed to provide an accurate description of a central mechanism governing our [inductive] inferential practices and also a way to show why these practices are reliable". In spite of its popularity, however, IBE is little more than a slogan. "So it is time to flesh out the slogan and to give the model the detailed assessment it deserves. That (...) is the purpose of this book". (shrink)
- (1 other version)A Note on Boghossian's Master Argument.Roger F.Gibson -1995 -Philosophical Issues 6:222-226.No categories
- Quine's dilemma.Roger F.Gibson -1986 -Synthese 69 (1):27 - 39.Quine has long maintained in connection with his theses of under-determination of physical theory and indeterminacy of translation that there is a fact of the matter to physics but no fact of the matter to translation. In this paper, I investigate Quine's reasoning for this claim. I show that Quine's thinking about under-determination over the last twenty-five years has landed him in a contradiction: he says of two global physical theories that are empirically equivalent but logically incompatible that only one (...) is trueand that they are both true. In accord with the former position, I explain Quine'ssemantical argument for the claim that there is a fact of the matter to physics but not to translation. However, Quine has apparently come to regard this position as inconsistent with his empiricistic scruples: if both theories imply all and only true observation categoricals, then in what sense could one of them be false? Quine'strivial expedient argument construes such pairs of theories as merely two true descriptions of the same world in different terms. In accord with this latter position, I suggest that Quine is left without a way to differentiate under-determination and indeterminacy. In short, Quine's contradiction poses a serious dilemma: either only one such theory is true and his empiricism is sacrificed, or both theories are true and his distinction between under-determination and indeterminacy is sacrificed. (shrink)
- More on Quine's Dilemma of Underdetermination.Roger F.Gibson -1991 -Dialectica 45 (1):59-66.SummaryQuine's doctrine of underdetermination of physical theory presents him with a dilemma: Should he say of two global theory formulations that are empirically equivalent, logically compatible, equally simple, but which cannot be rendered logically equivalent by any known reconstrual of predicates, that they are both true or that only one of them is true ? If the former, then Quine's commitment to naturalism is at risk; if the latter, then his commitment to empiricism is at risk. When confronted with the (...) dilemma Quine initially opted for the sectarian view. A.C. Genova finds Quine's sectarian resolution of the dilemma unsatisfactory. He advocates, instead, an ecumenical resolution of the dilemma which, he maintains, is compatible with Quine's most prominent views. I disagree; I argue that Genova's way out involves a relativistic notion of true that is incompatible with Quine's absolutist view of truth. I then present Quine's latest thoughts on the dilemma of underdetermination. (shrink)
- On an inconsistency in Thomson's abortion argument.Roger F.Gibson -1984 -Philosophical Studies 46 (1):131 - 139.I argue that thompson's analysis of the argument proscribing abortion except to save the woman's life is inconsistent, For it commits thompson to the following set of statements: (1) all fetuses have a right not to be killed unjustly; (2) no fetus can be aborted/killed unjustly unless it possesses a right to a woman's body; (3) some fetuses do not possess a right to a woman's body. I suggest two alternative ways to deal with this inconsistency.
- Stich on Intentionality and Rationality.Roger F.Gibson -1996 -ProtoSociology 8:30-38.In chapter 2 of The Fragmentation of Reason, Stephen Stich argues that certain passages of Quine’s Word and Object are the source of what he calls the conceptual argument. That argument claims there is a conceptual connection between intentionality and rationality: intentionality requires rationality. Stich rejects the idea that intentionality requires either perfect or fixed bridgehead rationality, but he concedes that it requires minimal rationality. After explaining Stich’s position and a criticism of it offered by John Biro and Kirk Ludwig, (...) I sketch an alternative to the conceptual argument. This alternative claims that rationality requires psychological plausibility and/or smoothness of communication, not rationality. (shrink)
- Two Conceptions of Philosophy.Roger F.Gibson -1993 -Grazer Philosophische Studien 44 (1):25-39.Quine's conception of philosophy, his doctrine of naturalism, is analyzed as springing from a negative side, the rejection of first philosophy, through holism and unregenerate realism, and leading to an affirmative side, the acceptance of science as the ultimate instance. Quine's position is compared with Lauener's pragmatic or open transcendentalism, which is conventionalist and explicitiy nonnaturalistic but in spite of a whole string of differences nevertheless similar to the former. Finally a naturalistic position gains preference because it has more explanatory (...) power and a purely conventionalist account of logic (and mathematics) seems quite unrealistic. (shrink)
- W. V. Quine.Roger F.Gibson -2006 - In John R. Shook & Joseph Margolis,A Companion to Pragmatism. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 101–107.This chapter contains sections titled: “Two Dogmas of Empiricism” “Two Dogmas of Empiricism” and Pragmatism.
- Access to medical records for research purposes: varying perceptions across research ethics boards.D. J. Willison,C. Emerson,K. V. Szala-Meneok,E.Gibson,L. Schwartz,K. M. Weisbaum,F. Fournier,K. Brazil &M. D. Coughlin -2008 -Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (4):308-314.Introduction: Variation across research ethics boards in conditions placed on access to medical records for research purposes raises concerns around negative impacts on research quality and on human subject protection, including privacy.Aim: To study variation in REB consent requirements for retrospective chart review and who may have access to the medical record for data abstraction.Methods: Thirty 90-min face-to-face interviews were conducted with REB chairs and administrators affiliated with faculties of medicine in Canadian universities, using structured questions around a case study (...) with open-ended responses. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and coded manually.Results: Fourteen sites required individual patient consent for the study to proceed as proposed. Three indicated that their response would depend on how potentially identifying variables would be managed. Eleven sites did not require consent. Two suggested a notification and opt-out process. Most stated that consent would be required if identifiable information was being abstracted from the record. Among those not requiring consent, there was substantial variation in recognising that the abstracted information could potentially indirectly re-identify individuals. Concern over access to medical records by an outside individual was also associated with requirement for consent. Eighteen sites required full committee review. Sixteen allowed an external research assistant to abstract information from the health record.Conclusions: Large variation was found across sites in the requirement for consent for research involving access to medical records. REBs need training in best practices for protecting privacy and confidentiality in health research. A forum for REB chairs to confidentially share concerns and decisions about specific studies could also reduce variation in decisions. (shrink)
- The anonymous progymnasmata in John Doxapatres' Homiliae in Aphthonium.Craig A.Gibson -2009 -Byzantinische Zeitschrift 102 (1):83-94.This article examines the anonymous progymnasmata in John Doxapatres' commentary on Aphthonius' Progymnasmata for evidence about their authorship, origin, and relations to other progymnasmata. These exercises include three chreias, a refutation and confirmation of the myth of Ganymedes, an encomium and invective of Agamemnon, a comparison of the grapevine and olive tree, and an ethopoeia on the deposition of the emperor Michael V Kalaphates. In addition to providing a formal rhetorical analysis of the exercises, the article offers further support for (...) the view of R. F. Hock and E. N. O'Neil that Doxapatres did not compose these exercises and that they all derive from a single collection. In an appendix, it argues that George Pachymeres, in his comparison of the olive tree and grapevine, used the anonymous comparison in Doxapatres and not the four parallel exercises by Ps.-Nicolaus. (shrink)No categories
- Melencolia Illa Heroica: Françoise Proust, Walter Benjamin and `Catastrophe in Permanence': In Memoriam F.P. 1947-1998.AndrewGibson -unknownFrançoise Proust’s essential points of reference are Kant and Walter Benjamin. Alain Badiou ignores the extraordinary and sometimes beautiful dark power of Proust’s work on Benjamin. As is clear, however, from both Daniel Bensaïd’s interview with Proust and the title of Élizabeth Lemirre and Catherine Perret’s memorial volume (Une philosophie de la résistance: Françoise Proust), the concept of Proust that is most likely to become the dominant one is not Badiou’s, but rather the concept of her as above all a (...) philosopher of `resistance’. (shrink)No categoriesExport citation Bookmark
- LE TOMBEAU DE STACE F. Delarue, S. Georgacopoulou, P. Laurens, A.-M. Taisne (edd.): Epicedion: Hommage à P. Papinius Statius, 96–1996 . Pp. 344. Poitiers: La Iicorne: UFR: Langues Littératures Poitiers, 1997. Paper, frs. 150. ISBN: 2-911044-08-. [REVIEW]BruceGibson -2000 -The Classical Review 50 (02):446-.
- Naturalism, Reference, and Ontology: Essays in Honor of Roger F.Gibson.Chase B. Wrenn (ed.) -2008 - Peter Lang Publishing Group.The essays address a wide range of topics, including normativity and naturalized epistemology, holism, consciousness, the philosophy of logic, perception, value ...
- Perception-Action Mutuality Obviates Mental Construction.M. F. Fultot,L. Nie &C. Carello -2016 -Constructivist Foundations 11 (2):298-307.Context: The dominant approach to the study of perception is representational/computational, with an emphasis on the achievements of the brain and the nervous system, which are taken to construct internal models of the world. Alternatives include ecological, embedded, embodied, and enactivist approaches, all of which emphasize the centrality of action in understanding perception. Problem: Despite sharing many theoretical commitments that lead to a rejection of the classical approach, the alternatives are characterized by important contrasts and points of divergence. Here we (...) focus on the enactive and ecological approaches, in particular, on how they construe the status of the environment and the content of perception. Method: We begin with a review of JamesGibson’s ecological psychology, highlighting it as a psychology for all organisms not just humans. Against this backdrop, we consider enactivist arguments against direct perception - a central assertion of the ecological approach - and in favor of interpreting the activity of perceptual agents as a kind of construction of a perceptually meaningful world. Results: We assess the merits of this interpretation and we conclude that it cannot be grounded on fundamental principles such as thermodynamics and organism-environment mutuality. Implications: As a consequence, enactivism remains close to representationalism and entails a form of dualism. Constructivist content: We advance a criticism of the constructivist foundations of the enactive approach to perception. Perception-action mutuality at the heart of enactivism does not require mental construction; indeed, perception-action mutuality obviates construction. (shrink)
- Toward an ecological conception of timbre.André L. G. Oliveira &Luis F. Oliveira -unknownThis paper is part of a series in which we had worked in the last 6 months, and, specifically, intend to investigate the notion of timbre through the ecological perspective proposed by JamesGibson in his Theory of Direct Perception. First of all, we discussed the traditional approach to timbre, mainly as developed in acoustics and psychoacoustics. Later, we proposed a new conception of timbre that was born in concepts of ecological approach. The ecological approach to perception proposed by (...)Gibson (1966, 1979) presupposes a level of analysis of perceptual stimulated that includes, but is quite broader than the usual physical aspect.Gibson suggests as focus the relationship between the perceiver and his environment. At the core of this approach, is the notion of affordances, invariant combinations of properties at the ecological level, taken with reference to the anatomy and action systems of species or individual, and also with reference to its biological and social needs. Objects and events are understood as relates to a perceiving organism by the meaning of structured information, thus affording possibilities of action by the organism. Event perception aims at identifying properties of events to specify changes of the environment that are relevant to the organism. The perception of form is understood as a special instance of event perception, which is the identity of an object depends on the nature of the events in which is involved and what remains invariant over time. From this perspective, perception is not in any sense created by the brain, but is a part of the world where information can be found. Consequently, an ecological approach represents a form of direct realism that opposes the indirect realist based on predominant approaches to perception borrowed from psychoacoustics and computational approach. (shrink)
- Sovremennai︠a︡ burzhuaznai︠a︡ metodologii︠a︡ nauki.A. F. Zotov &Iu V. Vorontsova -1983 - Moskva: Izd-vo Moskovskogo universiteta. Edited by I︠U︡. V. Voront︠s︡ova.Export citation Bookmark
- Chelovecheskai︠a︡ priroda i nravstvennostʹ: Ist.-kritich. ocherk.A. F. Shishkin -1979 - Moskva: Myslʹ.No categoriesExport citation Bookmark
- Marksistskai︠a︡ ėtika.A. F. Shishkin -1961 - Moskva,: Izd-vo In-ta mezhdunarodnukh otnosheniĭ. Edited by Vladimir Tikhonovich Efimov.No categoriesExport citation Bookmark
- A ciência como conhecimento derivado dos factos da experiência.A. F. Chalmers -2004 -Critica.No categories
- Knowledge production and the science-policy relation in Dutch soil policy: results from a survey on perceived roles of organisations.A. F. M. M. Souren,R. S. Poppen,P. Groenewegen &N. M. Van Straalen -unknownNo categories
- O fizike i fizikakh: statʹi, vystuplenii︠a︡, pisʹma.A. F. Ioffe -1985 - Leningrad: Izd-vo "Nauka," Leningradskoe otd-nie.Export citation Bookmark
- Racial decay. A compilation of evidence from world sources.A. F. Tredgold -1912 -The Eugenics Review 3 (4):362.No categories
- Poznavatelʹnye deĭstvii︠a︡ v sovremennoĭ nauke.A. F. Aporovich,Iu A. Kharin,A. I. Smirnov &Minski Radyiotekhnichny Instytut (eds.) -1987 - Minsk: "Nauka i tekhnika".Export citation Bookmark
- Gewecke, L. K. and A. D. Winspear, Augustus and the Reconstruction of Roman Government and Society.A. F. Jones -1936 -Classical Weekly 30:118-119.No categoriesExport citation Bookmark
- Idei i napravlenii︠a︡ otechestvennogo li︠u︡bomudrii︠a︡: lekt︠s︡ii, statʹi, kritika.A. F. Zamaleev -2003 - Sankt-Peterburg: Izdatelʹsko-torgovyĭ dom "Letniĭ sad".Export citation Bookmark
- Lepty: issledovanii︠a︡ po russkoĭ filosofii.A. F. Zamaleev -1996 - Sankt-Peterburg: Izd-vo Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta.Export citation Bookmark
- Novye issledovanii︠a︡ po russkoĭ filosofii: kritika, opponentskie otzyvy.A. F. Zamaleev -2001 - Moskva: Letniĭ sad.Export citation Bookmark
- Young delinquents: a study of reformatory and industrial schools.A. F. Tredgold -1914 -The Eugenics Review 6 (2):169.
- Epilepsy, a functional mental illness.A. F. Tredgold -1927 -The Eugenics Review 19 (2):134.
- Filosofii︠a︡ v Sankt-Peterburge, 1703-2003: spravochno-ėnt︠s︡iklopedicheskoe izdanie.A. F. Zamaleev &I︠U︡. N. Solonin (eds.) -2003 - Sankt-Peterburg: Peterburgskoe filosofskoe ob-vo.Export citation Bookmark
- Peterburgskiĭ sbornik russkoĭ filosofii.A. F. Zamaleev -2023 - Sankt-Peterburg: ID "Petropolis".Vvedenie v istorii︠u︡ russkoĭ filosofii -- Traktat o cheloveke -- Zametki o russkikh mysliteli︠a︡kh.Export citation Bookmark
- Elements of the critical philosophy.A. F. M. Willich -1798 - New York: Garland. Edited by Johann Christoph Adelung.
- Russkai︠a︡ filosofii︠a︡: novye issledovanii︠a︡ i materialy: problemy metodologii i metodiki.A. F. Zamaleev (ed.) -2001 - Sankt-Peterburg: Sankt-Peterburgskoe filosofskoe ob-vo.
- Proceedings of the second international congress for sex research, London, 1930.F. H. A. Marshall -1932 -The Eugenics Review 23 (4):352.
- The Pythagorean Precepts of Aristoxenus: Crucial Evidence for Pythagorean Moral Philosophy.A. Momigliano,F. Leo,J. Dillon &J. Hershbell -2008 -Classical Quarterly 58:104-120.
- The Physical Significance of the Quantum Theory.F. A. Lindemann -1933 -Philosophy 8 (29):112-113.No categories
- Lekt︠s︡ii po istorii russkoĭ filosofii.A. F. Zamaleev -1995 - Sankt-Peterburg: Izd-vo S.-Peterburgskogo universiteta.No categoriesExport citation Bookmark
- O Russkoĭ filosofii: statí, opponentskie otzyvy.A. F. Zamaleev -1998 - Sankt-Peterburg: Izd-vo Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta.No categoriesExport citation Bookmark
- Zapiski professora russkoĭ filosofii.A. F. Zamaleev -2022 - Sankt-Peterburg: ID "Petropolis".Export citation Bookmark
| 1 — 50 / 956 |
Off-campus access
Using PhilPapers from home?
Create an account to enable off-campus access through your institution's proxy server or OpenAthens.
Monitor this page
Be alerted of all new items appearing on this page. Choose how you want to monitor it:
 Email |  RSS feed |
Editorial team
General Editors:
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Area Editors:
David Bourget
Gwen Bradford
Berit Brogaard
Margaret Cameron
David Chalmers
James Chase
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Esa Diaz-Leon
Barry Hallen
Hans Halvorson
Jonathan Ichikawa
Monte Johnson
Michelle Kosch
Øystein Linnebo
Paul Livingston
Brandon Look
Manolo Martínez
Matthew McGrath
Michiru Nagatsu
Susana Nuccetelli
Giuseppe Primiero
Jack Alan Reynolds
Darrell P. Rowbottom
Aleksandra Samonek
Constantine Sandis
Howard Sankey
Jonathan Schaffer
Thomas Senor
Daniel Star
Jussi Suikkanen
Aness Kim Webster
Other editors
Contact us
Learn more about PhilPapers
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Area Editors:
David Bourget
Gwen Bradford
Berit Brogaard
Margaret Cameron
David Chalmers
James Chase
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Esa Diaz-Leon
Barry Hallen
Hans Halvorson
Jonathan Ichikawa
Monte Johnson
Michelle Kosch
Øystein Linnebo
Paul Livingston
Brandon Look
Manolo Martínez
Matthew McGrath
Michiru Nagatsu
Susana Nuccetelli
Giuseppe Primiero
Jack Alan Reynolds
Darrell P. Rowbottom
Aleksandra Samonek
Constantine Sandis
Howard Sankey
Jonathan Schaffer
Thomas Senor
Daniel Star
Jussi Suikkanen
Aness Kim Webster
Other editors
Contact us
Learn more about PhilPapers
Home |New books and articles |Bibliographies |Philosophy journals |About PhilPapers |API |Contact us |Code of conduct
PhilPapers logo byAndrea Andrews andMeghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see ourterms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications).Use of this site is subject toterms & conditions.
All rights reserved byThe PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-99fc7d78b-fdhjl uwo