Phonology is not accessed earlier than orthography in Chinese written production: evidence for the orthography autonomy hypothesis
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
(no proxy)My notes
Similar books and articles
The Knowledge of a Chinese Reader Concerning how Chinese Orthography Represents Phonology.Hue Chih-Wei,Lo Ming &Tsai Fang-Zhi -unknown
The Impact of Orthography on Text Production in Three Languages: Catalan, English, and Spanish.Anna Llaurado &Julie E. Dockrell -2020 -Frontiers in Psychology 11.
Phonology and orthography in visual word recognition.J. Grainger &L. Ferrand -1991 -Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 29 (6):514-514.
Meter, Phonology, and Orthography in Buddhist Hybrid Sanskrit.Franklin Edgerton -1946 -Journal of the American Oriental Society 66 (3):197-206.
An Essay on the Phonology and Orthography of the Zulu and Kindred Dialects in Southern Africa.Lewis Grout -1853 -Journal of the American Oriental Society 3:421-468.
Qumran Hebrew: An Overview of Orthography, Phonology, and Morphology. By Eric D. Reymond.Alexey Yuditsky -2021 -Journal of the American Oriental Society 138 (1).
How Orthography Modulates Morphological Priming: Subliminal Kanji Activation in Japanese.Yoko Nakano,Yu Ikemoto,Gunnar Jacob &Harald Clahsen -2016 -Frontiers in Psychology 7.
The role of orthography in speech production revisited.F. -X. Alario,Laetitia Perre,Caroline Castel &Johannes C. Ziegler -2007 -Cognition 102 (3):464-475.
Analytics
Added to PP
2016-06-30
Downloads
51 (#472,203)
6 months
9 (#452,675)
2016-06-30
Downloads
51 (#472,203)
6 months
9 (#452,675)
Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?Author's Profile
Citations of this work
References found in this work
A theory of lexical access in speech production.Willem J. M. Levelt,Ardi Roelofs &Antje S. Meyer -1999 -Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1):1-38.
A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production.Gary S. Dell -1986 -Psychological Review 93 (3):283-321.
Set size and repetition matter: comment on Caramazza and Costa.Ardi Roelofs -2001 -Cognition 80 (3):283-290.
Home |New books and articles |Bibliographies |Philosophy journals |About PhilPapers |API |Contact us |Code of conduct
PhilPapers logo byAndrea Andrews andMeghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see ourterms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications).Use of this site is subject toterms & conditions.
All rights reserved byThe PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-54b44b69b7-vb4rf uwo