Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


PhilPapersPhilPeoplePhilArchivePhilEventsPhilJobs

Nazis, Teleology, and the Freedom of Conscience: In Response to Gamble and Pruski’s ‘Medical Acts and Conscientious Objection: What Can a Physician be Compelled to Do?’

The New Bioethics 25 (4):359-373 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Medical practitioners of all specialisms are identified by their professional titles. Their function is determined by their regulators, and subject to voluntary employment contracts....

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Imperative of Conscientious Objection in Medical Practice.Paschal M. Corby -2018 -The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 18 (4):611-618.
Conscientious Objection, Moral Integrity, and Professional Obligations.Mark R. Wicclair -2019 -Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 62 (3):543-559.
Might there be a medical conscience?Nir Ben-Moshe -2019 -Bioethics 33 (7):835-841.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-11-09

Downloads
32 (#785,548)

6 months
14 (#232,462)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp