Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


PhilPapersPhilPeoplePhilArchivePhilEventsPhilJobs

Proper time and the clock hypothesis in the theory of relativity

European Journal for Philosophy of Science 6 (2):191-207 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

When addressing the notion of proper time in the theory of relativity, it is usually taken for granted that the time read by an accelerated clock is given by the Minkowski proper time. However, there are authors like Harvey Brown that consider necessary an extra assumption to arrive at this result, the so-called clock hypothesis. In opposition to Brown, Richard TW Arthur takes the clock hypothesis to be already implicit in the theory. In this paper I will present a view different from these authors by taking into account Einstein’s notion of natural clock and showing its relevance to the debate.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-09-26

Downloads
127 (#181,435)

6 months
11 (#332,704)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Mario Bacelar Valente
Pablo de Olavide University

Citations of this work

What do light clocks say to us regarding the so-called clock hypothesis?Mario Bacelar Valente -2018 -Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 33 (3):435-446.
Time in the Theory of Relativity: Inertial Time, Light Clocks, and Proper Time.Mario Bacelar Valente -2019 -Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 50 (1):13-27.

Add more citations


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp