Killing, Letting Die, and the Trolley Problem
Abstract
Judith Jarvis Thomson; Killing, Letting Die, and The Trolley Problem, The Monist, Volume 59, Issue 2, 1 April 1976, Pages 204–217, https://doi.org/10.5840/monis.Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Murderer at the Switch: Thomson, Kant, and the Trolley Problem.James Edwin Mahon -2021 - In Charles Tandy,Death And Anti-Death, Volume 19: One Year After Judith Jarvis Thomson (1929-2020). Ann Arbor, MI: Ria University Press. pp. 153-187.
The mechanics of hohfeldian rights, featuring a case study of Judith Jarvis Thomson on the trolley problem.Alec D. Walen &David Wasserman -unknown
Who Turned the Trolley?F. M. Kamm -2016 - In Eric Rakowski,The Trolley Problem Mysteries. New York, USA: Oxford University Press USA.
Trolley Cases and Being ‘In the Realm,’.Michael Barnwell -2010 -Southwest Philosophical Studies 32:29-35.
Dr. pfleiderer on the Samson story. (A translation.).Otto Pfleiderer -1907 -The Monist 17 (4):626 - 627.
Double effect, triple effect and the trolley problem: squaring the circle in looping cases.Michael Otsuka -2008 -Utilitas 20 (1):92-110.
Normativity by Judith Jarvis Thomson. [REVIEW]Gideon Rosen -2012 -Journal of Philosophy 109 (11):676-681.
Analytics
Added to PP
2011-02-21
Downloads
2,072 (#6,814)
6 months
99 (#69,847)
2011-02-21
Downloads
2,072 (#6,814)
6 months
99 (#69,847)
Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Ethics of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics.Vincent C. Müller -2020 - In Edward N. Zalta,Stanford Encylopedia of Philosophy. pp. 1-70.
Epistemic Teleology and the Separateness of Propositions.Selim Berker -2013 -Philosophical Review 122 (3):337-393.
The Rejection of Epistemic Consequentialism.Selim Berker -2013 -Philosophical Issues 23 (1):363-387.
Home |New books and articles |Bibliographies |Philosophy journals |About PhilPapers |API |Contact us |Code of conduct
PhilPapers logo byAndrea Andrews andMeghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see ourterms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications).Use of this site is subject toterms & conditions.
All rights reserved byThe PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-54b44b69b7-nwt9g uwo