The need for intellectual diversity in psychological science: Our own studies of actively open-minded thinking as a case study
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
The rationality quotient: toward a test of rational thinking, by Keith E. Stanovich, Richard F. West, and Maggie E. Toplak. [REVIEW]Joshua Weller -2017 -Thinking and Reasoning 23 (4):497-502.
Measuring Virtuous Responses to Peer Disagreement: The Intellectual Humility and Actively Open-Minded Thinking of Conciliationists.James R. Beebe &Jonathan Matheson -2023 -Journal of the American Philosophical Association 9 (3):426-449.
Measuring Virtuous Responses to Peer Disagreement: The Intellectual Humility and Actively Open-Minded Thinking of Conciliationists.James R. Beebe &Jonathan Matheson -2022 -Journal of the American Philosophical Association:1-24.
Review of Stanovich, K., West, R. and Toplak, M. ‘The rationality quotient: Toward a test of rational thinking’, Cambridge (MA), The MIT Press. [REVIEW]Michael Vlerick -2018 -Quarterly Review of Biology 93:43-44.
Rationality and the Reflective Mind by Keith E. Stanovich.Cathal Woods -2012 -Informal Logic 32 (3):373-380.
Open-minded and reflective thinking predicts reasoning and meta-reasoning: evidence from a ratio-bias conflict task.Henry W. Strudwicke,Glen E. Bodner,Paul Williamson &Michelle M. Arnold -2024 -Thinking and Reasoning 30 (3):419-445.
Actively open-minded thinking: development of a shortened scale and disentangling attitudes towards knowledge and people.Annika M. Svedholm-Häkkinen &Marjaana Lindeman -2018 -Thinking and Reasoning 24 (1):21-40.
Not Another Case Study: A Middle-Range Interrogation of Ethnographic Case Studies in the Exploration of E-science.Paul Wouters,Andrea Scharnhorst &Anne Beaulieu -2007 -Science, Technology, and Human Values 32 (6):672-692.
Analytics
Added to PP
2019-03-14
Downloads
36 (#697,672)
6 months
5 (#866,090)
2019-03-14
Downloads
36 (#697,672)
6 months
5 (#866,090)
Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?Author's Profile
Citations of this work
To Believe is Not to Think: A Cross-Cultural Finding.Neil Van Leeuwen,Kara Weisman &Tanya Luhrmann -2021 -Open Mind 5:91-99.
An examination of the underlying dimensional structure of three domains of contaminated mindware: paranormal beliefs, conspiracy beliefs, and anti-science attitudes.Jala Rizeq,David B. Flora &Maggie E. Toplak -2021 -Thinking and Reasoning 27 (2):187-211.
Distinct Profiles for Beliefs About Religion Versus Science.S. Emlen Metz,Emily G. Liquin &Tania Lombrozo -2023 -Cognitive Science 47 (11):e13370.
Conspiracy beliefs in the context of a comprehensive rationality assessment.Keith E. Stanovich &Maggie E. Toplak -2025 -Thinking and Reasoning 31 (1):7-29.
Open-minded and reflective thinking predicts reasoning and meta-reasoning: evidence from a ratio-bias conflict task.Henry W. Strudwicke,Glen E. Bodner,Paul Williamson &Michelle M. Arnold -2024 -Thinking and Reasoning 30 (3):419-445.
References found in this work
Dual-Process Theories of Higher Cognition Advancing the Debate.Jonathan Evans &Keith E. Stanovich -2013 -Perspectives on Psychological Science 8 (3):223-241.
Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?Keith E. Stanovich &Richard F. West -2000 -Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):645-665.
Confirmation, disconfirmation, and information in hypothesis testing.Joshua Klayman &Young-won Ha -1987 -Psychological Review 94 (2):211-228.
A theory of implicit and explicit knowledge.Zoltan Dienes &Josef Perner -1999 -Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):735-808.
On the reality of cognitive illusions.Daniel Kahneman &Amos Tversky -1996 -Psychological Review 103 (3):582-591.
Home |New books and articles |Bibliographies |Philosophy journals |About PhilPapers |API |Contact us |Code of conduct
PhilPapers logo byAndrea Andrews andMeghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see ourterms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications).Use of this site is subject toterms & conditions.
All rights reserved byThe PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-54b44b69b7-cj6sj uwo