Oxford Studies in Metaethics: Volume 1
Russ Shafer-Landau (ed.)
Clarendon Press (2006) Copy BIBTEX
Abstract
Devoted exclusively to original philosophical work on the foundations of ethics. Provides an annual selection of much of the best new scholarship being done in the field. Its broad purview includes work being done at the intersections of ethical theory with metaphysics, epistemology, philosophy of language, and philosophy of mind.Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
(no proxy)My notes
Chapters
Negation for expressivists: a collection of problems with a suggestion for their solution.James Dreier
Knowing enough to disagree: A new response to the moral twin earth argument. (pages 161-94)Mark van Roojen
Knowing enough to disagree: a new response to the moral twin earth argument. (pages 161-94)Mark van Roojen
Similar books and articles
Russ, Shafer-Landau (ed.) Oxford Studies in Metaethics. Volume 1 en 2, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2006 en 2007 [Book Review]. [REVIEW]Katrien Schaubroeck -2008 -Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 70 (4):163-164.
Oxford Studies in Metaethics, Volume 11.Russ Shafer-Landau (ed.) -2016 - Oxford University Press UK.
Oxford Studies in Metaethics, Volume 10.Russ Shafer-Landau (ed.) -2015 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press UK.
Oxford Studies in Metaethics: Volume 6.Russ Shafer-Landau (ed.) -2011 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
Oxford Studies in Metaethics, Volume 9.Russ Shafer-Landau (ed.) -2014 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
Analytics
Added to PP
2010-06-22
Downloads
117 (#194,754)
6 months
3 (#1,172,804)
2010-06-22
Downloads
117 (#194,754)
6 months
3 (#1,172,804)
Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Cognitivism, non-cognitivism, and skepticism about folk psychology.James Harold -2012 -Philosophical Psychology 25 (2):165 - 185.
Home |New books and articles |Bibliographies |Philosophy journals |About PhilPapers |API |Contact us |Code of conduct
PhilPapers logo byAndrea Andrews andMeghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see ourterms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications).Use of this site is subject toterms & conditions.
All rights reserved byThe PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-54b44b69b7-k24bk uwo