On the formal connection of the Einstein-podolsky-Rosen argument to quantum mechanics and reality
Abstract
It is argued that formal reconstructions of the EPR-argument do not only show semantical incompleteness, but also incorrectness of quantum mechanics together with the projection postulate. The latter has to be rejected because it contradicts Schrödinger's equation. A logical analogon to the problem is given.Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Relativity, Quantum Mechanics and EPR.Robert Clifton,Constantine Pagonis &Itamar Pitowsky -1992 -PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992 (Volume One: Contributed Papers):114 - 128.
From EPR-Schrödinger Paradox to Nonlocality Based on Perfect Correlations.Jean Bricmont,Sheldon Goldstein &Douglas Hemmick -2022 -Foundations of Physics 52 (3):1-14.
Quantum logic, conditional probability, and interference.Jeffrey Bub -1982 -Philosophy of Science 49 (3):402-421.
On the relation between the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox and the problem of nonlocality in quantum mechanics.Willem M. de Muynck -1986 -Foundations of Physics 16 (10):973-1002.
Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger Paradox for Three Tritters.Marek Żukowski &Dagomir Kaszlikowski -1999 -Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 7:275-278.
The physics of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox.B. H. Kellett -1977 -Foundations of Physics 7 (9-10):735-757.
Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Correct?Gilles Brassard &André Allan Méthot -2010 -Foundations of Physics 40 (4):463-468.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
77 (#296,087)
6 months
3 (#1,189,321)
2009-01-28
Downloads
77 (#296,087)
6 months
3 (#1,189,321)
Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?References found in this work
Home |New books and articles |Bibliographies |Philosophy journals |About PhilPapers |API |Contact us |Code of conduct
PhilPapers logo byAndrea Andrews andMeghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see ourterms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications).Use of this site is subject toterms & conditions.
All rights reserved byThe PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6c559f95d5-pwd7m uwo