Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


PhilPapersPhilPeoplePhilArchivePhilEventsPhilJobs

Why gender is a relevant factor in the social epistemology of scientific inquiry

Philosophy of Science 71 (5):880-891 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In recent years, feminist philosophy of science has been subjected to criticism. The debate has focused on the implications of the underdetermination thesis for accounts of the role of social values in scientific reasoning. My aim here is to offer a different approach. I suggest that feminist philosophers of science contribute to our understanding of science by (1) producing gender‐sensitive analyses of the social dimensions of scientific inquiry and (2) examining the relevance of these analyses for normative issues in philosophy of science.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Scientific practices and their social context.Daniel Hicks -2012 - Dissertation, U. Of Notre Dame
Feminist Epistemology and Philosophy of Science.Elizabeth Anderson -2012 - In Ed Zalta,Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, CA: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
From Explanation to Understanding: Normativity Lost?Henk Regt -2019 -Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 50 (3):327-343.
Feminist implications of model-based science.Angela Potochnik -2012 -Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 43 (2):383-389.
From Explanation to Understanding: Normativity Lost?Henk W. de Regt -2019 -Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 50 (3):327-343.
Feminist Accounts of Science.Kathleen Okruhlik -2000 - In W. Newton-Smith,A companion to the philosophy of science. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell. pp. 134–142.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
310 (#96,193)

6 months
21 (#147,917)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp