Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


PhilPapersPhilPeoplePhilArchivePhilEventsPhilJobs

Supernumerary Pregnancy, Collective Harm, and Two Forms of the Nonidentity Problem

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 34 (4):776-792 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

An interesting question, in both the moral and the legal context, is whether babies born of an infertility treatment-induced supernumerary pregnancy are properly considered to have been harmed. One might wonder how such a question could even arise in the face of data that clearly demonstrate that ITISP leaves an unduly large number of babies blind, deaf, and palsied, and facing lifelong disabilities. In fact, however, a number of arguments, based on the problem of collective form and two forms of the so-called “nonidentity problem,” challenge the claim of harm in the ITISP context. The purpose of the present paper is to establish, as against these arguments, that harm has been imposed on the ITISP-damaged offspring

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-31

Downloads
42 (#592,971)

6 months
10 (#382,927)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Melinda A. Roberts
The College of New Jersey

Citations of this work

Toward a Philosophy of Harm Reduction.Shannon Dea -2020 -Health Care Analysis 28 (4):302-313.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Reasons and Persons.Joseph Margolis -1984 -Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 47 (2):311-327.
Can we harm and benefit in creating?Elizabeth Harman -2004 -Philosophical Perspectives 18 (1):89–113.
The paradox of future individuals.Gregory S. Kavka -1982 -Philosophy and Public Affairs 11 (2):93-112.

View all 8 references / Add more references


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp