- This entry has no external links.Add one.
Contemporary Philosophy of Mind: A Contentiously Classical Approach
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Contemporary Philosophy of Mind: A Contentiously Classical Approach (Review). [REVIEW]W. Martin Davies -1998 -Australasian Journal of Philosophy 76 (2):341-343.
Contemporary Philosophy of Mind: A Contentiously Classical Approach.Georges Rey -1997 - Cambridge, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell.
Georges Rey, contemporary philosophy of mind: A contentiously classical approach, contemporary philosophy series. [REVIEW]Abraham Witonsky -1999 -Minds and Machines 9 (2):287-290.
Meaning in Mind: Fodor and His Critics, edited by Barry Loewer and Georges Rey. [REVIEW]Harold Noonan -1992 -Philosophical Books 33 (4):232-234.
Fodor and psychological explanation.John Perry &David J. Israel -1990 - In Barry M. Loewer,Meaning in Mind: Fodor and His Critics. Cambridge: Blackwell.
Normativism defended.Ralph Wedgwood -2007 - In Brian P. McLaughlin & Jonathan Cohen,Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Mind. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 85--102.
How to Eliminate Computational Eliminativism.Davor Pećnjak -2005 -Croatian Journal of Philosophy 5 (3):433-439.
The interplay of consciousness and concepts.Rocco J. Gennaro (ed.) -2007 - Charlottesille, VA: Imprint Academic.
Analytics
Added to PP
2017-02-19
Downloads
0
6 months
0
2017-02-19
Downloads
0
6 months
0
Historical graph of downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Color realism and color science.Alex Byrne &David R. Hilbert -2003 -Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (1):3-21.
Spacetime Emergence in Quantum Gravity: Functionalism and the Hard Problem.Baptiste Le Bihan -2019 -Synthese 199 (2):371–393.
Home |New books and articles |Bibliographies |Philosophy journals |About PhilPapers |API |Contact us |Code of conduct
PhilPapers logo byAndrea Andrews andMeghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see ourterms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications).Use of this site is subject toterms & conditions.
All rights reserved byThe PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-54b44b69b7-nwt9g uwo