Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


PhilPapersPhilPeoplePhilArchivePhilEventsPhilJobs

Feminist Separatism Revisited

Journal of Controversial Ideas 3 (2):1-18 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Conflict over who belongs in women-only spaces is now part of mainstream political debate. Some think women-only spaces should exclude on the basis of sex, and others think they should exclude on the basis of a person’s self-determined gender identity. Many who take the latter view appear to believe that the only reason for taking the former view could be antipathy towards men who identify as women. In this paper, we’ll revisit the second-wave feminist literature on separatism, in order to uncover the reasons for women-only spaces as feminists originally conceived them. Once these reasons are understood, those participating in debates over women-only spaces will be in a better position to adjudicate on whether shifting from sex to gender identity puts any significant interests at stake.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links.Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-12-16

Downloads
705 (#40,536)

6 months
379 (#5,709)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Holly Lawford-Smith
University of Melbourne

Citations of this work

The Circulation of Trans Philosophy: A Philosophical Polemic.Amy Marvin -2024 -Apa Studies on Feminism and Philosophy 24 (1):2-12.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Metaphysics of Intersectionality Revisited.Holly Lawford-Smith &Kate Phelan -2021 -Journal of Political Philosophy 30 (2):166-187.

Add more references


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp