Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


PhilPapersPhilPeoplePhilArchivePhilEventsPhilJobs

Who Goes First? Deaf People and CRISPR Germline Editing

Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 63 (1):54-65 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Two years ago, the US National Academy of Sciences and the National Academy of Medicine released a report drafted by an international committee regarding the use of gene editing in humans. Once a tedious and expensive process, gene editing has now become more accessible and cheaper using the new CRISPR technology, making the issue of its use more urgent and pressing. The committee cites general support for somatic nonheritable gene editing to correct for a serious disease already present in a human being, but more controversial is germline gene editing for heritable conditions. Performing gene editing that affects an individual's descendants is at present tightly controlled in the US, but around the...

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

CRISPR Cautions: Biosecurity Implications of Gene Editing.Rachel M. West &Gigi Kwik Gronvall -2020 -Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 63 (1):73-92.
Children of Capital: Eugenics in the World of Private Biotechnology.Nicholas G. Evans &Jonathan D. Moreno -2015 -Ethics in Biology, Engineering and Medicine 6 (3-4):285-297.
The Medical Case for Gene Editing.Julian Savulescu &Christopher Gyngell -2015 -Ethics in Biology, Engineering and Medicine 6 (1-2):57-66.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-02-11

Downloads
39 (#641,402)

6 months
5 (#864,813)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp