Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


PhilPapersPhilPeoplePhilArchivePhilEventsPhilJobs

Understanding molecular structure requires constructive realism

Foundations of Chemistry 22 (3):457-465 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Since molecules are inaccessible to immediate observation, our conception of the molecule is brought about by transdiction which entails invention of various transcendental ideas. In organic chemistry we think that molecules consist of atoms, bonds, functional groups, etc. This is, however, not the unique description of the molecule as is shown by quantum mechanical calculations, for example. Then, what description represents the real molecule? Before asking this question, we have to consider what the real molecule is in the first place. Constructive realism distinguishes our cognitive world and the world just given, and claims that we should accept the former as reality. Understanding our cognitive world is possible only through construction of micro-worlds. Atoms, bonds, functional groups, etc., are micro-worlds which make sense in a theoretical framework of organic chemistry. In this study we translate a micro-world to an affordance and paraphrase it as a context-relative dispositional attribute of an {agent-world} complex. Then, we can understand that it is what we take as molecular structure, not what might be out there to be found, that we should accept as reality. Excluding metaphysical fictions from scientific arguments, constructive realism makes science a meaningful activity. Constructive realism claims that, for getting knowledge of the world, we have to integrate information into our own linguistic frame, i.e., to translate it. Strangification is a technique of intentionally taking an accepted proposition out of one scientific system and putting it into a completely different context. As is the case with translation, strangification brings about deeper understanding of philosophical as well as scientific grounds on which the proposition system holds. We apply this method to molecular structure and reveal that it is an ingenious model to describe molecular behavior in multi-molecular systems with strong interactions between molecules. Information provided by strangification is essential to claim the legitimacy of a proposition system. As far as strangification is properly applied, relativism is irrelevant to constructive realism.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Philosophical grounds for designing invisible molecules.Hirofumi Ochiai -2022 -Foundations of Chemistry 25 (1):141-149.
A New Vision of Science.Fritz Wallner -1998 -The Paideia Archive: Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 37:363-367.
Does a molecule have structure?Hirofumi Ochiai -2017 -Foundations of Chemistry 19 (3):197-207.
Philosophical Foundations of Stereochemistry.Hirofumi Ochiai -2015 -Hyle: International Journal for Philosophy of Chemistry 21 (1):1-18.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-03-30

Downloads
30 (#834,587)

6 months
8 (#521,509)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Philosophical grounds for designing invisible molecules.Hirofumi Ochiai -2022 -Foundations of Chemistry 25 (1):141-149.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Philosophy, Science and Sense Perception.Maurice Mandelbaum -1968 -British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 19 (3):269-270.
Philosophy, Science, and Sense-Perception.Maurice Mandelbaum -1962 -Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 36:5 - 20.

View all 6 references / Add more references


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp