- This entry has no external links.Add one.
Enlightenment and dissent in science: Joseph Priestley and the limits of theoretical reasoning
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Science, medicine, Dissent: Joseph Priestley. [REVIEW]Geoffrey Cantor -1989 -Enlightenment and Dissent 8:125-129.
Joseph Priestley: Political Writings. [REVIEW]James Dybikowski -1996 -Enlightenment and Dissent 15:117-127.
Joseph Priestley, man of science, 1783-1804. An iconography of a great Yorkshireman. [REVIEW]Derek Davenport -1984 -Enlightenment and Dissent 3:115-116.
Joseph Priestley and the idea of progress. [REVIEW]Margaret Canovan -1988 -Enlightenment and Dissent 7:105-107.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-02-10
Downloads
1 (#1,966,722)
6 months
1 (#1,604,333)
2014-02-10
Downloads
1 (#1,966,722)
6 months
1 (#1,604,333)
Historical graph of downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
The development of problems within the phlogiston theories, 1766–1791.Geoffrey Blumenthal &James Ladyman -2017 -Foundations of Chemistry 19 (3):241-280.
Science and Worldviews in the Classroom: Joseph Priestley and Photosynthesis.Michael R. Matthews -2009 -Science & Education 18 (6-7):929-960.
Priestley's Questions: An Historiography Survey.Simon Schaffer -1984 -History of Science 22 (2):151-183.
Millennium and Enlightenment: Robert Owen and the Second Coming of the truth.Gareth Stedman Jones -2021 -History of European Ideas 47 (2):252-270.
Home |New books and articles |Bibliographies |Philosophy journals |About PhilPapers |API |Contact us |Code of conduct
PhilPapers logo byAndrea Andrews andMeghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see ourterms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications).Use of this site is subject toterms & conditions.
All rights reserved byThe PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6c559f95d5-2r5t5 uwo