What makes a classical concept classical? Toward a reconstruction of Niels Bohr's philosophy of physics
InNiels Bohr and Contemporary Philosophy. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 201--230 (1994) Copy BIBTEX
Abstract
— Niels Bohr, 19231 “There must be quite definite and clear grounds, why you repeatedly declare that one must interpret observations classically, which lie absolute ly in thei r essenc e. . . . It must belong to your deepest conviction—and I cannot understand on what you base it.”.Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
(no proxy)My notes
Similar books and articles
What makes a classical concept classical?Don Howard -1993 - In Jan Faye & Henry J. Folse,Niels Bohr and Contemporary Philosophy. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 201--229.
Niels Bohr's argument for the irreducibility of biology to physics.Paul Hoyningen-Huene -1993 - In Jan Faye & Henry J. Folse,Niels Bohr and Contemporary Philosophy. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 231--255.
Niels Bohr's Conceptual Legacy in Contemporary Particle Physics.David Kaiser -1993 - In Jan Faye & Henry J. Folse,Niels Bohr and Contemporary Philosophy. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 257--268.
Niels Bohr and the Philosophy of Physics: Twenty-First Century Perspectives.Jan Faye &Henry J. Folse (eds.) -2017 - New York: Bloomsbury.
Niels Bohr’s Philosophy of Quantum Physics in the Light of the Helmholtzian Tradition of Theoretical Physics. [REVIEW]Robert Bishop -2004 -Isis 95:334-335.
Bohr and the Realism Debates.Edward MacKinnon -1993 - In Jan Faye & Henry J. Folse,Niels Bohr and Contemporary Philosophy. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 279–302.
Bohr’s Response to EPR.Mara Beller &Arthur Fine -1993 - In Jan Faye & Henry J. Folse,Niels Bohr and Contemporary Philosophy. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 1–31.
Niels Bohr and Contemporary Philosophy.Jan Faye &Henry J. Folse (eds.) -1993 - Kluwer Academic Publishers.
A critique of Bohr's local realism.Henry Krips -1993 - In Jan Faye & Henry J. Folse,Niels Bohr and Contemporary Philosophy. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 269--277.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
209 (#126,640)
6 months
12 (#295,105)
2009-01-28
Downloads
209 (#126,640)
6 months
12 (#295,105)
Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Who invented the “copenhagen interpretation”? A study in mythology.Don Howard -2004 -Philosophy of Science 71 (5):669-682.
Between classical and quantum.Nicolaas P. Landsman -2007 -Handbook of the Philosophy of Science 2:417--553.
Niels Bohr on the wave function and the classical/quantum divide.Henrik Zinkernagel -2016 -Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 53:9-19.
Is Bohr’s Correspondence Principle just Hankel’s Principle of Permanence?Iulian D. Toader -2024 -Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 103 (C):137-145.
References found in this work
Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?Albert Einstein,Boris Podolsky &Nathan Rosen -1935 -Physical Review (47):777-780.
The Physical Principles of the Quantum Theory: Transl. Into Engl. By Carl Eckart and Frank C. Hoyt.Werner Heisenberg -1930 - Chicago: Ill., The University of Chicago Press. Edited by Carl Eckart & Frank Clark Hoyt.
The philosophy of Niels Bohr: the framework of complementarity.Henry J. Folse -1985 - New York, N.Y.: Sole distributors for the U.S.A. and Canada, Elsevier Science Pub. Co..
Home |New books and articles |Bibliographies |Philosophy journals |About PhilPapers |API |Contact us |Code of conduct
PhilPapers logo byAndrea Andrews andMeghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see ourterms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications).Use of this site is subject toterms & conditions.
All rights reserved byThe PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-54b44b69b7-bbztg uwo