Inclusion by Invitation Only? Public Engagement beyond Deliberation in the Governance of Innovative Biotechnology
Abstract
From their interpretation of the Australian Citizens’ Jury on genome editing, Scheinerman (2023) concludes that inclusive and diverse deliberative processes of public engagement have salient benefi...Other Versions
No versions found
(no proxy)My notes
Similar books and articles
Public Engagement with Human Germline Editing Requires Specification.Boy Vijlbrief,Sam Riedijk &Eline M. Bunnik -2023 -American Journal of Bioethics 23 (12):77-79.
Public Engagement through Inclusive Deliberation: The Human Genome International Commission and Citizens’ Juries.Naomi Scheinerman -2022 -American Journal of Bioethics 23 (12):66-76.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Public Engagement through Inclusive Deliberation: The Human Genome International Commission and Citizens’ Juries”.Naomi Scheinerman -2022 -American Journal of Bioethics 23 (12):1-3.
Not All Publics Are the Same—A Note on Power, Diversity, and Lived Expertise in Public Deliberation.Yves Saint James Aquino,Stacy Carter &Chris Degeling -2023 -American Journal of Bioethics 23 (12):85-87.
Deliberative Mini-Publics and Equity: Procedural Benefits and Promising Outcomes for Gene Editing.Naomi Scheinerman -2023 -American Journal of Bioethics 23 (7):74-76.
The Promise and Reality of Public Engagement in the Governance of Human Genome Editing Research.John M. Conley,R. Jean Cadigan,Arlene M. Davis,Eric T. Juengst,Kriste Kuczynski,Rami Major,Hayley Stancil,Julio Villa-Palomino,Margaret Waltz &Gail E. Henderson -2023 -American Journal of Bioethics 23 (7):9-16.
The Intrinsic Value of Public Deliberation in the Governance of Human Genome Editing.Kalina Kamenova -2023 -American Journal of Bioethics 23 (7):63-65.
Rethinking the “Public” and Rethinking “Engagement”.Brandy Fox &Daphne Oluwaseun Martschenko -2023 -American Journal of Bioethics 23 (7):66-68.
What Difference Can Public Engagement in Genome Editing Make, and for Whom?Richard Milne,Ugbaad Aidid,Jerome Atutornu,Tuba Bircan,Daniela Boraschi,Alessia Costa,Sasha Henriques,Christine Patch &Anna Middleton -2023 -American Journal of Bioethics 23 (7):58-60.
The Australian Citizens’ Jury and Global Citizens’ Assembly on Genome Editing.Dianne Nicol,John Stanley Dryzek,Simon Niemeyer,Nicole Curato &Rebecca Paxton -2023 -American Journal of Bioethics 23 (7):61-63.
Analytics
Added to PP
2023-11-28
Downloads
24 (#1,004,054)
6 months
1 (#1,600,438)
2023-11-28
Downloads
24 (#1,004,054)
6 months
1 (#1,600,438)
Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?Citations of this work
Public Engagement through Inclusive Deliberation: The Human Genome International Commission and Citizens’ Juries.Naomi Scheinerman -2022 -American Journal of Bioethics 23 (12):66-76.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Public Engagement through Inclusive Deliberation: The Human Genome International Commission and Citizens’ Juries”.Naomi Scheinerman -2022 -American Journal of Bioethics 23 (12):1-3.
References found in this work
The Promise and Reality of Public Engagement in the Governance of Human Genome Editing Research.John M. Conley,R. Jean Cadigan,Arlene M. Davis,Eric T. Juengst,Kriste Kuczynski,Rami Major,Hayley Stancil,Julio Villa-Palomino,Margaret Waltz &Gail E. Henderson -2023 -American Journal of Bioethics 23 (7):9-16.
Public Engagement through Inclusive Deliberation: The Human Genome International Commission and Citizens’ Juries.Naomi Scheinerman -2022 -American Journal of Bioethics 23 (12):66-76.
Public involvement in the governance of population-level biomedical research: unresolved questions and future directions.Sonja Erikainen,Phoebe Friesen,Leah Rand,Karin Jongsma,Michael Dunn,Annie Sorbie,Matthew McCoy,Jessica Bell,Michael Burgess,Haidan Chen,Vicky Chico,Sarah Cunningham-Burley,Julie Darbyshire,Rebecca Dawson,Andrew Evans,Nick Fahy,Teresa Finlay,Lucy Frith,Aaron Goldenberg,Lisa Hinton,Nils Hoppe,Nigel Hughes,Barbara Koenig,Sapfo Lignou,Michelle McGowan,Michael Parker,Barbara Prainsack,Mahsa Shabani,Ciara Staunton,Rachel Thompson,Kinga Varnai,Effy Vayena,Oli Williams,Max Williamson,Sarah Chan &Mark Sheehan -2021 -Journal of Medical Ethics 47 (7):522-525.
Who Goes First? Deaf People and CRISPR Germline Editing.Carol Padden &Jacqueline Humphries -2020 -Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 63 (1):54-65.
Home |New books and articles |Bibliographies |Philosophy journals |About PhilPapers |API |Contact us |Code of conduct
PhilPapers logo byAndrea Andrews andMeghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see ourterms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications).Use of this site is subject toterms & conditions.
All rights reserved byThe PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-54b44b69b7-sq5lk uwo