Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


PhilPapersPhilPeoplePhilArchivePhilEventsPhilJobs

Replicator II – judgement day

Biology and Philosophy 12 (4):471-492 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The Developmental Systems approach to evolution is defended against the alternative extended replicator approach of Sterelny, Smith and Dickison (1996). A precise definition is provided of the spatial and temporal boundaries of the life-cycle that DST claims is the unit of evolution. Pacé Sterelny et al., the extended replicator theory is not a bulwark against excessive holism. Everything which DST claims is replicated in evolution can be shown to be an extended replicator on Sterelny et al.s definition. Reasons are given for scepticism about the heuristic value claimed for the extended replicator concept. For every competitive, individualistic insight the replicator theorist has a cooperative, systematic blindspot.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
179 (#140,976)

6 months
34 (#117,975)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Paul Edmund Griffiths
University of Sydney

Citations of this work

Consumers Need Information: supplementing teleosemantics with an input condition.Nicholas Shea -2007 -Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 75 (2):404-435.
Innateness and the sciences.Matteo Mameli &Patrick Bateson -2006 -Biology and Philosophy 21 (2):155-188.
Mindreading, mindshaping, and evolution.Matteo Mameli -2001 -Biology and Philosophy 16 (5):595-626.

View all 46 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture.Jerome H. Barkow,Leda Cosmides &John Tooby -1992 - Oxford University Press. Edited by Jerome H. Barkow, Leda Cosmides & John Tooby.
In defense of proper functions.Ruth Millikan -1989 -Philosophy of Science 56 (June):288-302.

View all 21 references / Add more references


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp