Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Relevant deduction and hypothetico-deductivism: A reply to Gemes. [REVIEW]Gerhard Schurz -1994 -Erkenntnis 41 (2):183 - 188.
The tacking by disjunction paradox: Bayesianism versus hypothetico-deductivism.Luca Moretti -2006 -Erkenntnis 64 (1):115-138.
Hypothetico-deductivism, content, and the natural axiomatization of theories.Ken Gemes -1993 -Philosophy of Science 60 (3):477-487.
Revamping Hypothetico-Deductivism: A Dialectic Account of Confirmation. [REVIEW]Gregor Betz -2013 -Erkenntnis 78 (5):991-1009.
Relevance logic brings hope to hypothetico-deductivism.C. Kenneth Waters -1987 -Philosophy of Science 54 (3):453-464.
Corrections: Hypothetico-Deductivism Is Hopeless.[author unknown] -1980 -Philosophy of Science 47 (3):503-503.
Popper and hypothetico-deductivism.Alan Musgrave -2004 - In Dov M. Gabbay, John Woods & Akihiro Kanamori,Handbook of the history of logic. Boston: Elsevier. pp. 10--205.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
58 (#405,870)
6 months
5 (#855,890)
2009-01-28
Downloads
58 (#405,870)
6 months
5 (#855,890)
Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?Author's Profile
Citations of this work
References found in this work
Hypothetico-deductivism, content, and the natural axiomatization of theories.Ken Gemes -1993 -Philosophy of Science 60 (3):477-487.
Home |New books and articles |Bibliographies |Philosophy journals |About PhilPapers |API |Contact us |Code of conduct
PhilPapers logo byAndrea Andrews andMeghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see ourterms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications).Use of this site is subject toterms & conditions.
All rights reserved byThe PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-54b44b69b7-k24bk uwo