Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


PhilPapersPhilPeoplePhilArchivePhilEventsPhilJobs

The Possibility of Inquiry: Meno’s Paradox from Socrates to Sextus

Oxford: Oxford University Press (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Meno's Paradox from Socrates to Sextus Gail Fine. sense that they consider the issues it raises; and they argue, against its conclusion, that inquiry is possible. Like Plato and Aristotle, they also explain what makes inquiry possible; and they do ...

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-07-17

Downloads
163 (#149,504)

6 months
12 (#294,727)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Gail Fine
Cornell University

Citations of this work

The Knowledge Norm for Inquiry.Christopher Willard-Kyle -2023 -Journal of Philosophy 120 (11):615-640.
Norms of Inquiry.Eliran Haziza -2023 -Philosophy Compass 18 (12):e12952.
The Zetetic.Arianna Falbo -forthcoming - In Kurt Sylvan, Ernest Sosa, Jonathan Dancy & Matthias Steup,The Blackwell Companion to Epistemology, 3rd edition. Wiley Blackwell.
The Benefit to Philosophy of the Study of its History.Maria Rosa Antognazza -2015 -British Journal for the History of Philosophy 23 (1):161-184.
Ignorance, soundness, and norms of inquiry.Christopher Willard-Kyle -2024 -Philosophical Studies 181 (6):1477-1485.

View all 35 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

True Belief in the Meno.Panagiotis Dimas -1996 -Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 14:1-32.
Inquiry.Nicholas P. White -1974 -Review of Metaphysics 28 (2):289 - 310.
The Stoics on Definition.Paolo Crivelli -2010 - In David Charles,Definition in Greek philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press.

Add more references


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp