The ethics of biosafety considerations in gain-of-function research resulting in the creation of potential pandemic pathogens: Table 1
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author Profiles
Other Versions
No versions found
(no proxy)My notes
Similar books and articles
Future pandemics and the urge to ‘do something’.Adam Lerner &Nir Eyal -2025 -Journal of Medical Ethics 51 (4):227-229.
Evaluation of the work of hospital districts’ research ethics committees in Finland: Table 1.Ritva Halila -2014 -Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (12):866-868.
Navigating the maze: ethics approval pathways for intellectual disability research: Table 1.Allyson Thomson,Peter Roberts &Alan Bittles -2014 -Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (11):782-786.
A comparison of justice frameworks for international research: Table 1.Bridget Pratt &Bebe Loff -2015 -Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (7):539-544.
Opting out: confidentiality and availability of an ‘alibi’ for potential living kidney donors in the USA: Table 1.Carrie Thiessen,Yunsoo A. Kim,Richard Formica,Margaret Bia &Sanjay Kulkarni -2015 -Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (7):506-510.
Biopreserving Pathogens: Promise & Peril.Justyna Jaskiewicz,Susan M. Wolf,Mehmet Toner &Rebecca D. Sandlin -2024 -Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 52 (3):624-636.
Book Review: Jason Reimer Greig, Reconsidering Intellectual Disability: L’Arche, Medical Ethics, and Christian Friendship. [REVIEW]Guido de Graaff -2017 -Studies in Christian Ethics 30 (4):489-492.
Environmental and Biosafety Research Ethics Committees: Guidelines and Principles for Ethics Reviewers in the South African Context.Maricel Van Rooyen -2021 - Dissertation, Stellenbosch University
Meira Levinson and Jacob Fay (eds.), Democratic Discord in Schools.Mark Vopat -2022 -Journal of Moral Philosophy 19 (4):424-426.
Analytics
Added to PP
2015-09-03
Downloads
42 (#591,060)
6 months
7 (#624,698)
2015-09-03
Downloads
42 (#591,060)
6 months
7 (#624,698)
Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?Author Profiles
Citations of this work
Reconciling Regulation with Scientific Autonomy in Dual-Use Research.Nicholas G. Evans,Michael J. Selgelid &Robert Mark Simpson -2022 -Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 47 (1):72-94.
Dual-use implications of AI text generation.Julian J. Koplin -2023 -Ethics and Information Technology 25 (2):1-11.
Socially responsible science: Exploring the complexities.Inmaculada de Melo-Martín &Kristen Intemann -2023 -European Journal for Philosophy of Science 13 (3):1-18.
Gain-of-Function Research: Ethical Analysis.Michael J. Selgelid -2016 -Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (4):923-964.
The dual use of research ethics committees: why professional self-governance falls short in preserving biosecurity.Sabine Salloch -2018 -BMC Medical Ethics 19 (1):53.
References found in this work
Ethical and philosophical consideration of the dual-use dilemma in the biological sciences.Seumas Miller &Michael J. Selgelid -2007 -Science and Engineering Ethics 13 (4):523-580.
Bench to bedside: Mapping the moral terrain of clinical research.Steven Joffe &Franklin G. Miller -2008 -Hastings Center Report 38 (2):30-42.
Mapping the Moral Terrain of Clinical Research.Steven Joffe &Franklin G. Miller -2012 -Hastings Center Report 38 (2):30-42.
Great expectations—ethics, avian flu and the value of progress.Nicholas G. Evans -2013 -Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (4):209-213.
The Increasingly Compelling Moral Responsibilities of Life Scientists.David A. Relman -2013 -Hastings Center Report 43 (2):34-35.
Home |New books and articles |Bibliographies |Philosophy journals |About PhilPapers |API |Contact us |Code of conduct
PhilPapers logo byAndrea Andrews andMeghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see ourterms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications).Use of this site is subject toterms & conditions.
All rights reserved byThe PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-54b44b69b7-72j75 uwo