- From the Publisher via CrossRef (no proxy)
- philreview.dukejournals.org (no proxy)
- philreview.dukejournals.org [2] (no proxy)
- philreview.dukejournals.org [3] (no proxy)
- philreview.dukejournals.org [4] (no proxy)
- jstor.org (no proxy)
- pdcnet.org (no proxy)
- read.dukeupress.edu
(no proxy) - read.dukeupress.edu [2] (no proxy)
Assertion, knowledge, and rational credibility
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Spinoza's distinction between rational and intuitive knowledge.Spencer Carr -1978 -Philosophical Review 87 (2):241-252.
Review of Igor Douven, The Art of Abduction. [REVIEW]Ilkka Niiniluoto -2024 -Journal of Philosophy 121 (3):5-6.
Kant's Rational Theology.Lectures on Philosophical Theology.Ralf Meerbote,Allen W. Wood,I. Kant &Gertrude M. Clark -1980 -Philosophical Review 89 (2):285.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
463 (#68,233)
6 months
27 (#127,618)
2009-01-28
Downloads
463 (#68,233)
6 months
27 (#127,618)
Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Between Probability and Certainty: What Justifies Belief.Martin Smith -2016 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press UK.
References found in this work
Home |New books and articles |Bibliographies |Philosophy journals |About PhilPapers |API |Contact us |Code of conduct
PhilPapers logo byAndrea Andrews andMeghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see ourterms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications).Use of this site is subject toterms & conditions.
All rights reserved byThe PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-54b44b69b7-nwt9g uwo