Conflict monitoring in dual process theories of thinking
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
The effortless nature of conflict detection during thinking.Wim de Neys &Samuel Franssens -2009 -Thinking and Reasoning 15 (2):105-128.
Conflict paradigms cannot reveal competence.Roman Feiman -2023 -Behavioral and Brain Sciences 46:e120.
Reframing Single- and Dual-Process Theories as Cognitive Models: Commentary on De Neys (2021). [REVIEW]Aliya R. Dewey -2021 -Perspectives in Psychological Science 16 (6):1428–31.
Are we good at detecting conflict during reasoning?Gordon Pennycook,Jonathan A. Fugelsang &Derek J. Koehler -2012 -Cognition 124 (1):101-106.
Not feeling right about uncertainty monitoring.Ian R. Newman &Valerie A. Thompson -2023 -Behavioral and Brain Sciences 46:e133.
How research on persuasion can inform dual-process models of judgment.Richard E. Petty,Duane T. Wegener &Pablo Briñol -2023 -Behavioral and Brain Sciences 46:e138.
Hoist by its own petard: The ironic and fatal flaws of dual-process theory.David E. Melnikoff &John A. Bargh -2023 -Behavioral and Brain Sciences 46:e132.
The dual-system approach is a useful heuristic but does not accurately describe behavior.Jeffrey W. Sherman &Samuel A. W. Klein -2023 -Behavioral and Brain Sciences 46:e139.
Advancing the specification of dual process models of higher cognition: a critical test of the hybrid model view.Bence Bago &Wim De Neys -2019 -Thinking and Reasoning 26 (1):1-30.
Dual Process Theories for Calculus.Mario Graziano -2018 - InDual-Process Theories of Numerical Cognition. Cham: Springer Verlag.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-01-20
Downloads
82 (#274,869)
6 months
8 (#521,037)
2014-01-20
Downloads
82 (#274,869)
6 months
8 (#521,037)
Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?Citations of this work
The best game in town: The reemergence of the language-of-thought hypothesis across the cognitive sciences.Jake Quilty-Dunn,Nicolas Porot &Eric Mandelbaum -2023 -Behavioral and Brain Sciences 46:e261.
Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory.Dan Sperber -2011 -Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (2):57.
Advancing theorizing about fast-and-slow thinking.Wim De Neys -2023 -Behavioral and Brain Sciences 46:e111.
Subtracting “ought” from “is”: Descriptivism versus normativism in the study of human thinking.Shira Elqayam &Jonathan St B. T. Evans -2011 -Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (5):233-248.
Miserliness in human cognition: the interaction of detection, override and mindware.Keith E. Stanovich -2018 -Thinking and Reasoning 24 (4):423-444.
References found in this work
Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.Daniel Kahneman,Paul Slovic &Amos Tversky (eds.) -1982 - Cambridge University Press.
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.Amos Tversky &Daniel Kahneman -1974 -Science 185 (4157):1124-1131.
On the psychology of prediction.Daniel Kahneman &Amos Tversky -1973 -Psychological Review 80 (4):237-251.
Home |New books and articles |Bibliographies |Philosophy journals |About PhilPapers |API |Contact us |Code of conduct
PhilPapers logo byAndrea Andrews andMeghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see ourterms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications).Use of this site is subject toterms & conditions.
All rights reserved byThe PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-54b44b69b7-g6h22 uwo