Days of Future Past: Reply to Open Peer Commentaries on “Revising, Correcting, and Transferring Genes”
Abstract
Volume 20, Issue 8, August 2020, Page W1-W3.Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Is It All About Revising, Correcting, and Transferring Genes?Vasilija Rolfes,Uta Bittner,Heiner Fangerau &Karsten Weber -2020 -American Journal of Bioethics 20 (8):30-32.
Revising, Correcting and Transferring Genes: Germline Editing Versus Natural Reproduction.Jesse Gray -2020 -American Journal of Bioethics 20 (8):44-46.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “The Concept of Voluntary Consent”.Robert M. Nelson &Tom L. Beauchamp -2011 -American Journal of Bioethics 11 (8):W1-W3.
Technology Changes the Ethical Stakes in HIV Surveillance and Prevention: Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Reassessing the Ethics of Molecular HIV Surveillance in the Era of Cluster Detection and Response”.Stephen Molldrem &Anthony K. J. Smith -2020 -American Journal of Bioethics 20 (10):W1-W3.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Rationing Just Medical Care”.Lawrence J. Schneiderman -2011 -American Journal of Bioethics 11 (10):W1 - W3.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Solidarity and Community Engagement in Global Health Research”.Bridget Pratt,Phaik Yeong Cheah &Vicki Marsh -2020 -American Journal of Bioethics 20 (8):W14-W16.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “How Payment for Research Participation Can Be Coercive”.Joseph Millum &Michael Garnett -2020 -American Journal of Bioethics 20 (8):W8-W11.
Advocacy Through a Prism: A Response to Commentaries on “Patient Advocacy in Clinical Ethics Consultation”.Lisa M. Rasmussen -2012 -American Journal of Bioethics 12 (8):W1 - W3.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Partnering with Patients to Bridge Gaps in Consent for Acute Care Research”.Neal W. Dickert,A. Michelle Bernard,JoAnne M. Brabson,Rodney J. Hunter,Regina McLemore,Andrea R. Mitchell,Stephen Palmer,Barbara Reed,Michele Riedford,Raymond T. Simpson,Candace D. Speight,Tracie Steadman &Rebecca D. Pentz -2020 -American Journal of Bioethics 20 (8):W12-W13.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Can Medical Repatriation Be Ethical? Establishing Best Practices”.Mark Kuczewski -2012 -American Journal of Bioethics 12 (9):W1-W3.
Analytics
Added to PP
2020-08-07
Downloads
23 (#1,034,211)
6 months
3 (#1,186,068)
2020-08-07
Downloads
23 (#1,034,211)
6 months
3 (#1,186,068)
Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Days of Future Past: Reply to Open Peer Commentaries on “Revising, Correcting, and Transferring Genes”.Bryan Cwik -2020 -American Journal of Bioethics 20 (8):W1-W3.
Host as a Unique Ethical Dimension of Germline Interventions.Connor T. A. Brenna -2020 -American Journal of Bioethics 20 (8):51-53.
Upstream Ethical Mapping of Germline Genome Editing.Jodi Halpern &David Paolo -2020 -American Journal of Bioethics 20 (8):1-4.
References found in this work
Revising, Correcting, and Transferring Genes.Bryan Cwik -2020 -American Journal of Bioethics 20 (8):7-18.
Intergenerational monitoring in clinical trials of germline gene editing.Bryan Cwik -2020 -Journal of Medical Ethics 46 (3):183-187.
What to Expect When Expecting CRISPR Baby Number Four.Cynthia Selin &Christopher Thomas Scott -2019 -American Journal of Bioethics 19 (3):7-9.
Days of Future Past: Reply to Open Peer Commentaries on “Revising, Correcting, and Transferring Genes”.Bryan Cwik -2020 -American Journal of Bioethics 20 (8):W1-W3.
Home |New books and articles |Bibliographies |Philosophy journals |About PhilPapers |API |Contact us |Code of conduct
PhilPapers logo byAndrea Andrews andMeghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see ourterms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications).Use of this site is subject toterms & conditions.
All rights reserved byThe PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-54b44b69b7-k24bk uwo