Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


PhilPapersPhilPeoplePhilArchivePhilEventsPhilJobs

Appraising valence

Journal of Consciousness Studies 12 (8-10):8-10 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

‘Valence’ is used in many different ways in emotion theory. It generally refers to the ‘positive’ or ‘negative’ character of an emotion, as well as to the ‘positive’ or ‘negative’ character of some aspect of emotion. After reviewing these different uses, I point to the conceptual problems that come with them. In particular, I dis- tinguish: problems that arise from conflating the valence of an emotion with the valence of its aspects, and problems that arise from the very idea that an emotion (and/or its aspects) can be divided into mutually exclusive opposites. The first group of problems does not question the classic dichotomous notion of valence, but the second does. In order to do justice to the richness of daily emotions, emo- tion science needs more complex conceptual tools.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

For Valence.Jesse Prinz -2010 -Emotion Review 2 (1):5-13.
Valence, Bodily (Dis)Pleasures and Emotions.Fabrice Teroni -2019 - In Michael S. Brady, David Bain & Jennifer Corns,Philosophy of Suffering: Metaphysics, Value, and Normativity. London: Routledge. pp. 103-122.
Emotionally charged: The Puzzle of Affective Valence.Fabrice Teroni -2011 - In Christine Tappolet, Fabrice Teroni & Anita Konzelman Ziv,Philosophical Perspectives on Negative Emotions: Shadows of the Soul. New York: Routledge. pp. 1–11.
The heat of emotion: Valence and the demarcation problem.Louis Charland -2005 -Journal of Consciousness Studies 12 (8-10):82-102.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
276 (#104,847)

6 months
19 (#161,182)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp