Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


PhilPapersPhilPeoplePhilArchivePhilEventsPhilJobs

The Arguments of Time

New York: Oup/British Academy (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

These nine essays address fundamental questions about time in philosophy, physics, linguistics, and psychology. Are there facts about the future? Could we affect the past? In physics, general relativity and quantum theory give contradictory treatments of time. So in the current search for a theory of quantum gravity, which should give way: general relativity or quantum theory? In linguistics and psychology, how does our language represent time, and how do our minds keep track of it?

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
182 (#139,111)

6 months
11 (#332,407)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jeremy Butterfield
Cambridge University

Citations of this work

Quantum states for primitive ontologists: A case study.Gordon Belot -2012 -European Journal for Philosophy of Science 2 (1):67-83.
Presentism and quantum gravity.Bradley Monton -2006 - In Dennis Geert Bernardus Johan Dieks,Ontology of Spacetime. Boston: Elsevier.
What is Analytic Metaphysics For?James Maclaurin &Heather Dyke -2012 -Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90 (2):291-306.
Can Physics Coherently Deny the Reality of Time?Richard Healey -2002 -Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 50:293-.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp