Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


PhilPapersPhilPeoplePhilArchivePhilEventsPhilJobs

Paradox without satisfaction

Analysis 63 (2):152–156 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Consider the following denumerably infinite sequence of sentences: (s1) For all k > 1, sk is not true. (s2) For all k > 2, sk is not true. (s3) For all k > 3, sk is not true.

Other Versions

No versions found

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
789 (#34,491)

6 months
12 (#291,840)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Otávio Bueno
University of Miami
Mark Colyvan
University of Sydney

Citations of this work

What Truth Depends on.Hannes Leitgeb -2005 -Journal of Philosophical Logic 34 (2):155-192.
In Defence of Radical Restrictionism.David Liggins -2019 -Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 98 (1):3-25.
A Unified Theory of Truth and Paradox.Lorenzo Rossi -2019 -Review of Symbolic Logic 12 (2):209-254.
Equiparadoxicality of Yablo’s Paradox and the Liar.Ming Hsiung -2013 -Journal of Logic, Language and Information 22 (1):23-31.

View all 12 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp