- This entry has no external links.Add one.
Seeing the laws of nature [author's response to Norton, 1993]
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Exploring thought experiments: Michael T. Stuart, Yiftach Fehige and James Robert Brown : The Routledge companion to thought experiments. Routledge: Oxon, New York, 2018, 567pp., USD$235.00 HB.Carla Rita Palmerino -2019 -Metascience 28 (3):455-458.
Book Review:The Nature of Social Laws: Machiavelli to Mill. Robert Brown. [REVIEW]Maurice Mandelbaum -1986 -Ethics 96 (2):427-.
Intuitions in Science: Thought Experiments as Argument Pumps.Darrell Patrick Rowbottom -2014 - In Anthony Robert Booth & Darrell P. Rowbottom,Intuitions. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press UK. pp. 119-134.
The nature of social laws : Robert Brown , x + 270 pp., $39.50 cloth. [REVIEW]John W. Murphy -1988 -History of European Ideas 9 (2):236-236.
The epistemology of thought experiments: A non-eliminativist, non-platonic account.Hayley Clatterbuck -2013 -European Journal for Philosophy of Science 3 (3):309-329.
The Nature of Social Laws: Machiavelli to Mill By Robert Brown Cambridge University Press, 1984, 270 pp., £22.50. [REVIEW]Oliver Letwin -1985 -Philosophy 60 (232):276-.
Author’s response to Mousa Mohammadian, William Peden and Elay Shech.John D. Norton -2022 -Metascience 31 (3):317-323.
Review Symposium: Life After Evolutionary Psychology: Author's Response.David J. Buller -2007 -Metascience 16:17-24.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-03-30
Downloads
0
6 months
0
2014-03-30
Downloads
0
6 months
0
Historical graph of downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Are Thought Experiments Just What You Thought?John D. Norton -1996 -Canadian Journal of Philosophy 26 (3):333 - 366.
On thought experiments: Is there more to the argument?John D. Norton -2004 -Philosophy of Science 71 (5):1139-1151.
TheAnnus Mirabilis of 1986: Thought Experiments and Scientific Pluralism.Yiftach Fehige -2021 -Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 11 (1):222-240.
Parts of Falling Objects: Galileo’s Thought Experiment in Mereological Setting.Rafał Gruszczyński -2022 -Erkenntnis 87 (4):1583-1604.
Home |New books and articles |Bibliographies |Philosophy journals |About PhilPapers |API |Contact us |Code of conduct
PhilPapers logo byAndrea Andrews andMeghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see ourterms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications).Use of this site is subject toterms & conditions.
All rights reserved byThe PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-5b9ff6f457-cbsf4 uwo