Are generalised scalar implicatures generated by default? An on-line investigation into the role of context in generating pragmatic inferences
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author Profiles
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
A Contribution from the Perspective of Language Cognitive Sciences on the Default Semantics and Architecture of Mind Debate.Caterina Scianna -2019 - In Alessandro Capone, Marco Carapezza & Franco Lo Piparo,Further Advances in Pragmatics and Philosophy: Part 2 Theories and Applications. Springer Verlag. pp. 391-408.
Generalized Conversational Implicatures and Default Pragmatic Inferences.Anne Bezuidenhout -2002 - In Joseph Keim-Campbell, Michael O'Rourke & David Shier,Meaning and Truth: Investigations in Philosophical Semantics. Seven Bridges Press. pp. 257--283.
Against Chierchia's computational account of scalar implicatures.Owen Greenhall -2008 -Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 108 (1pt3):373-384.
Pragmatic responses to under-informative some-statements are not scalar implicatures.Mikhail Kissine &Philippe De Brabanter -2023 -Cognition 237 (C):105463.
The Role of Presuppositions and Default Implicatures in Framing Effects.María Caamaño-Alegre -2021 - In Tadeusz Ciecierski & Paweł Grabarczyk,Context Dependence in Language, Action, and Cognition. De Gruyter. pp. 181-208.
Scalar Implicatures Versus Presuppositions: The View from Acquisition.Cory Bill,Jacopo Romoli,Florian Schwarz &Stephen Crain -2016 -Topoi 35 (1):57-71.
The Role of Working Memory in the Processing of Scalar Implicatures of Patients With Schizophrenia Spectrum and Other Psychotic Disorders.Walter Schaeken,Linde Van de Weyer,Marc De Hert &Martien Wampers -2021 -Frontiers in Psychology 12.
The role of alternative salience in the derivation of scalar implicatures.Alice Rees &Lewis Bott -2018 -Cognition 176 (C):1-14.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-01-20
Downloads
314 (#95,522)
6 months
11 (#332,132)
2014-01-20
Downloads
314 (#95,522)
6 months
11 (#332,132)
Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?Author Profiles
Citations of this work
Processing Scalar Implicature: A Constraint‐Based Approach.Judith Degen &Michael K. Tanenhaus -2015 -Cognitive Science 39 (4):667-710.
Pragmatic tolerance: Implications for the acquisition of informativeness and implicature.Napoleon Katsos &Dorothy V. M. Bishop -2011 -Cognition 120 (1):67-81.
“Some,” and possibly all, scalar inferences are not delayed: Evidence for immediate pragmatic enrichment.Daniel J. Grodner,Natalie M. Klein,Kathleen M. Carbary &Michael K. Tanenhaus -2010 -Cognition 116 (1):42-55.
Processing inferences at the semantics/pragmatics frontier: Disjunctions and free choice.Emmanuel Chemla &Lewis Bott -2014 -Cognition 130 (3):380-396.
References found in this work
Relevance theory.Deirdre Wilson &Dan Sperber -2002 - In Deirdre Wilson & Dan Sperber,Relevance theory. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 607-632.
Pragmatics, Modularity and Mind‐reading.Dan Sperber &Deirdre Wilson -2002 -Mind and Language 17 (1-2):3–23.
The sausage machine: A new two-stage parsing model.Lyn Frazier &Janet Dean Fodor -1978 -Cognition 6 (4):291-325.
When children are more logical than adults: Experimental investigations of scalar implicature.Ira A. Noveck -2001 -Cognition 78 (2):165-188.
Home |New books and articles |Bibliographies |Philosophy journals |About PhilPapers |API |Contact us |Code of conduct
PhilPapers logo byAndrea Andrews andMeghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see ourterms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications).Use of this site is subject toterms & conditions.
All rights reserved byThe PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-54b44b69b7-vb4rf uwo