Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


PhilPapersPhilPeoplePhilArchivePhilEventsPhilJobs

A New Argument for Anti-Natalism

South African Journal of Philosophy 31 (1):117-127 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Consider the view that coming into existence is bad for us. Can we hold this and yet deny that ceasing to exist would be good for us? I argue that we can. First, many animals have lives such that they would be better off not existing. Second, if persons and babies are distinct things then the same is true of babies. Third, even if persons and babies are not distinct things – rather they are phases that human beings go through – still it is bad for babies that they come into existence. So it was bad for us to come into existence. But most of us now enjoy worthwhile lives. So it would be bad for us, now, to cease to exist

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Comparative Harm, Creation and Death.Neil Feit -2016 -Utilitas 28 (2):136-163.
Hooray for babies.David Spurrett -2011 -South African Journal of Philosophy 30 (2):197-206.
When the Shape of a Life Matters.Stephen M. Campbell -2015 -Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 18 (3): 565-75.
The Worseness of Nonexistence.Theron Pummer -2019 - In Solberg Gamlund and,Saving lives from the badness of death. Oxford University Press. pp. 215-228.
Sick and Healthy: Benatar on the Logic of Value.Skott Brill -2012 -South African Journal of Philosophy 31 (1):38-54.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-13

Downloads
327 (#91,493)

6 months
31 (#120,403)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp