Human dignity and legal reactions to reproductive cloning: is the principle too vague?
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
(no proxy)My notes
Similar books and articles
Cloning--a step too far? An article on the ethical aspects of cloning in animals and humans.D. M. Bruce -1997 -Human Reproduction and Genetic Ethics 4 (2):34-38.
Human cloning laws, human dignity and the poverty of the policy making dialogue.Timothy Caulfield -2003 -BMC Medical Ethics 4 (1):1-7.
The Prohibition on Eugenics and Reproductive Liberty.Jacqueline A. Laing -2006 -University of New South Wales Law Journal 29:261-266.
Legal responses to some of the new developments in reproductive technologies. Part 1.Andrew Scott -2000 -Human Reproduction and Genetic Ethics 7 (2):28-37.
A resource-based version of the argument that cloning is an affront to human dignity.R. McDougall -2008 -Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (4):259-261.
Islamic perspectives on human cloning.Mahmoud Sadeghi -2010 -Human Reproduction and Genetic Ethics 13 (2):32.
Is regulation of human cloning necessary?Alejo Sánchez-Vivar -2004 -Human Reproduction and Genetic Ethics 10 (2):69-76.
Creating Unique Copies: Human Reproductive Cloning, Uniqueness, and Dignity.Evangelos D. Protopapadakis -2023 - Berlin: Logos Verlag Berlin.
Legal responses to some of the new developments in reproductive technologies, Part. 2: the case of Diane Blood.A. Scott -2001 -Human Reproduction and Genetic Ethics 8 (1):11-19.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-03-14
Downloads
29 (#861,538)
6 months
10 (#383,177)
2014-03-14
Downloads
29 (#861,538)
6 months
10 (#383,177)
Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?Author's Profile
Home |New books and articles |Bibliographies |Philosophy journals |About PhilPapers |API |Contact us |Code of conduct
PhilPapers logo byAndrea Andrews andMeghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see ourterms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications).Use of this site is subject toterms & conditions.
All rights reserved byThe PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-54b44b69b7-cj6sj uwo