Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


PhilPapersPhilPeoplePhilArchivePhilEventsPhilJobs
Switch to: References

Add citations

You mustlogin to add citations.
  1. Philosophy of education in a new key: Future of philosophy of education.Liz Jackson,MichaelA Peters,Lei Chen,Zhongjing Huang,Wang Chengbing,Ezekiel Dixon-Román,Aislinn O'Donnell,Yasushi Maruyama,Lisa A. Mazzei,Alison Jones,Candace R. Kuby,Rowena Azada-Palacios,Elizabeth Adams St Pierre,Jacoba Matapo,Gina A. Opiniano,Peter Roberts,Michael Hand,Alecia Y. Jackson,Jerry Rosiek,Te Kawehau Hoskins,Kathy Hytten &Marek Tesar -2022 -Educational Philosophy and Theory 54 (8):1234-1255.
    What is the future of Philosophy of education? Or as many of scholars and thinkers in this final ‘future-focused’ collective piece from the philosophy of education in a new key Series put it, what are the futures—plural and multiple—of the intersections of ‘philosophy’ and ‘education?’ What is ‘Philosophy’; and what is ‘Education’, and what role may ‘enquiry’ play? Is the future of education and philosophy embracing—or at least taking seriously—and thinking with Indigenous ethicoontoepistemologies? And, perhaps most importantly, what is that (...) ‘Future’? These debates have been located in the work of diverse scholars: from the West, from Global South, from indigenous thinkers. In this collective piece, we purposefully juxtapose diverse takes on the future of these intersections. We have given up the urge to organise, place together, separate with subheadings or connect the paragraphs that follow. Instead, we let these philosophers of education and thinkers who use philosophical texts and ideas to sit together in one long read as potentially ‘strange and unusual bedfellows’. This text urges us to understand how these scholars and thinkers perceive our educational philosophical futures, and how the work and thinking they have done on thinking about what the future of that new key in philosophy of education may look like is embedded in a much deeper and richer literature, and personal experience. (shrink)
    Direct download(2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • Philosophy of education in a new key: Snapshot 2020 from the United States and Canada.Liz Jackson,Kal Alston,Lauren Bialystok,Larry Blum,Nicholas C. Burbules,Ann Chinnery,David T. Hansen,Kathy Hytten,Cris Mayo,Trevor Norris,Sarah M. Stitzlein,Winston C. Thompson,Leonard Waks,Michael A. Peters &Marek Tesar -2022 -Educational Philosophy and Theory 54 (8):1130-1146.
    This article shares reflections from members of the community of philosophers of education in the United States and Canada who were invited to express their insights in response to the theme ‘Snaps...
    Direct download(2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  • Philosophy of Education in a New Key: Who Remembers Greta Thunberg? Education and Environment after the Coronavirus.Petar Jandrić,Jimmy Jaldemark,Zoe Hurley,Brendan Bartram,Adam Matthews,Michael Jopling,Julia Mañero,Alison MacKenzie,Jones Irwin,Ninette Rothmüller,Benjamin Green,Shane J. Ralston,Olli Pyyhtinen,Sarah Hayes,Jake Wright,Michael A. Peters &Marek Tesar -2021 -Educational Philosophy and Theory 53 (14):1421-1441.
    This paper explores relationships between environment and education after the Covid-19 pandemic through the lens of philosophy of education in a new key developed by Michael Peters and the Philosophy of Education Society of Australasia. The paper is collectively written by 15 authors who responded to the question: Who remembers Greta Thunberg? Their answers are classified into four main themes and corresponding sections. The first section, ‘As we bake the earth, let's try and bake it from scratch’, gathers wider philosophical (...) considerations about the intersection between environment, education, and the pandemic. The second section, ‘Bump in the road or a catalyst for structural change?’, looks more closely into issues pertaining to education. The third section, ‘If you choose to fail us, we will never forgive you’, focuses to Greta Thunberg’s messages and their responses. The last section, ‘Towards a new normal’, explores future scenarios and develops recommendations for critical emancipatory action. The concluding part brings these insights together, showing that resulting synergy between the answers offers much more then the sum of articles’ parts. With its ethos of collectivity, interconnectedness, and solidarity, philosophy of education in a new key is a crucial tool for development of post-pandemic education. (shrink)
    Direct download(3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • Philosophy of education in a new key: Exploring new ways of teaching and doing ethics in education in the 21st century.Rachel Anne Buchanan,Daniella Jasmin Forster,Samuel Douglas,Sonal Nakar,Helen J. Boon,Treesa Heath,Paul Heyward,Laura D’Olimpio,Joanne Ailwood,Scott Eacott,Sharon Smith,Michael Peters &Marek Tesar -2022 -Educational Philosophy and Theory 54 (8):1178-1197.
    Within the rough ground that is the field of education there is a complex web of ethical obligations: to prepare our students for their future work; to be ethical as educators in our conduct and teaching; to the ethical principles embedded in the contexts in which we work; and given the Southern context of this work, the ethical obligations we have to this land and its First Peoples. We put out a call to colleagues whose work has been concerned with (...) the pedagogies of professional ethics, the ethical burdens of institutional injustice, and the application of ethical theory to education’s applied fields. In the responses we received it can be seen that ethical concerns in education are broad ranging, covering terrain varying from the preparation of preservice teachers, ethics in higher education, early childhood and care, educational leadership, relational and communicative ethics. Perhaps it could also be argued that this paper demonstrates Gibbon’s observation that ‘Assumptions about the particularity of this time as new and ripe with opportunity to make a difference through philosophy of education are not new and there’s much to learn from the persistence of wanting to imagine that they are’. However, while the field of ethics is perennially concerned with human relations and pedagogical interventions to improve these, the responses collected here show that educational ethics is far from static. Educational ethics is a field that continues to develop in response to changing contexts. (shrink)
    Direct download(3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • The ethical academy? The university as an ethical system.Marek Tesar,Michael Peters &Liz Jackson -2021 -Educational Philosophy and Theory 53 (5):419-425.
  • Philosophy of education in a new key: A ‘Covid Collective’ of the Philosophy of Education Society of Great Britain (PESGB).Janet Orchard,Philip Gaydon,Kevin Williams,Pip Bennett,Laura D’Olimpio,Raşit Çelik,Qasir Shah,Christoph Neusiedl,Judith Suissa,Michael A. Peters &Marek Tesar -2021 -Educational Philosophy and Theory 53 (12):1215-1228.
    This article is a collective writing experiment undertaken by philosophers of education affiliated with the PESGB (Philosophy of Education Society of Great Britain). When asked to reflect on questions concerning the Philosophy of Education in a New Key in May 2020, it was unsurprising that the effects of the coronavirus pandemic on society and on education were foremost in our minds. We wanted to consider important philosophical and educational questions raised by the pandemic, while acknowledging that, first and foremost, it (...) is a human tragedy. With nearly a million deaths reported worldwide to date, and with everyone effected in one way or another by Covid-19, there is a degree of discomfort, and a responsibility to be sensitive, in reflecting and writing about it academically. Members of this ‘Covid Collective’ come from various countries, with perspectives from Great Britain and Ireland well represented, and we see academic practice as a globally connected enterprise, especially since the digital revolution in academic publishing. The concerns raised in this article relate to but move beyond Covid-19, reflecting the impact of neoliberalism [and other political developments] on geopolitics with educational concerns as central to our focus. (shrink)
    Direct download(2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • Philosophy of education in a new key: Publicness, social justice, and education; a South-North conversation.Marek Tesar,Michael A. Peters,Robert Hattam,Leah O’Toole,Lester-Irabinna Rigney,Kathryn Paige,Suzanne O’Keeffe,Hannah Soong,Carl Anders Säfström,Jenni Carter,Alison Wrench,Deirdre Forde,Sam Osborne,Lotar Rasiński,Hana Cervinkova,Kathleen Heugh &Gert Biesta -2022 -Educational Philosophy and Theory 54 (8):1216-1233.
    Public education is not just a way to organise and fund education. It is also the expression of a particular ideal about education and of a particular way to conceive of the relationship between education and society. The ideal of public education sees education as an important dimension of the common good and as an important institution in securing the common good. The common good is never what individuals or particular groups want or desire, but always reaches beyond such particular (...) desires towards that which societies as a whole should consider as desirable. This does, of course, put the common good in tension with the desires of individuals and groups. Neo-liberal modes of governance have, over the past decades, put this particular educational set up under pressure and have, according to some, eroded the very idea of the common good. This set of contributions reflects on this state of affairs, partly through an exploration of the idea of publicness itself – how it can be rearticulated and regained – and partly through reflections on the current state of education in the ‘north’ and the ‘south.’. (shrink)
    Direct download(2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Philosophy of education in a new key: On radicalization and violent extremism.Mitja Sardoč,C. A. J. Coady,Vittorio Bufacchi,Fathali M. Moghaddam,Quassim Cassam,Derek Silva,Nenad Miščević,Gorazd Andrejč,Zdenko Kodelja,Boris Vezjak,Michael A. Peters &Marek Tesar -2022 -Educational Philosophy and Theory 54 (8):1162-1177.
    This collective paper on radicalization and violent extremism part of the ‘Philosophy of education in a new key’ initiative by Educational Philosophy and Theory brings together some of the leading contemporary scholars writing on the most pressing epistemological, ethical, political and educational issues facing post-9/11 scholarship on radicalization and violent extremism. Its overall aim is to move beyond the ‘conventional wisdom’ associated with this area of scholarly research best represented by its many slogans, metaphors and other thought-terminating clichés. By providing (...) conceptual lenses on issues previously compartmentalized primarily [or even exclusively] in security and intelligence studies or at the fringes of scholarly interest, radicalization and violent extremism turn out to be much more complex than ‘radicalization studies’ has been eager to acknowledge. (shrink)
    Direct download(2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Philosophy of education in a new key: Reflection on higher education in Iran.Bakhtiar Shabani Varaki,Alireza Sadeqzadeh Qamsari,Meisam Sefidkhosh,Seyed Mahdi Sajjadi,Reza Mohammadi Chaboki,Tahereh Javidi Kalatehjafarabadi,Hojjat Saffarheidari,Meisam Mohammadamini,Omid Karimzadeh,Ramazan Barkhordari,Saeid Zarghami-Hamrah,Michael A. Peters &Marek Tesar -2022 -Educational Philosophy and Theory 54 (8):1198-1215.
    This collective article discusses the philosophy of modern higher education in Iran, which in this case, optimistically, its history dates back to the founding of Dār al-fonūn —if we consider Dār al-fonūn as a university. Otherwise, its origin can be traced back to the University of Tehran. Central to this article is the emphasis on the lack of philosophy of higher education in Iran. Therefore, most of the criticisms in front of us are related to the internal inconsistency in the (...) Iranian higher education system due to the lack of a national-indigenized-official philosophy of higher education in Iran. Furthermore, The Islamic Revolution of 1979 brought about fundamental changes in higher education. Accordingly, several controversial issues including the rapid growth of higher education, the Islamization of universities, cultural narratives in higher education, the increase in students, especially women and the low-income class of the country were also explored. Therefore, in this collection, the political, economic, social, cultural, moral, technological and historical dimensions of Iranian higher education were examined. (shrink)
    Direct download(2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Inclusion, democracy, and philosophy of education: Nuraan Davids and Yusef Waghid'sDemocratic education as inclusion.Penny Enslin -2024 -Journal of Philosophy of Education 57 (6):1193-1202.
    For philosophers of education who hold on to the optimistic hope that democracy education can play a part in halting the decline of democracy, Davids and Waghid point the way towards its potential contribution when approached by making inclusion foundational to democratic education. Taking a poststructuralist approach as the best way to articulate an expanded conception of inclusion, this book makes the case that there is an urgent need for a reconsidered conception of democratic education that appropriately addresses race, ethnicity (...) and gender. This review's critical appreciation of Davids and Waghids book explores their analysis of inclusion, noting its illuminating use of examples of exclusion in South African education which are also relevant to wider contexts beyond the specificities of apartheid and post-apartheid South Africa. In raising some questions about their arguments, I express reservations about the book's predominant focus on race, ethnicity and gender as markers of identity. This is at the expense of class and material exclusion—and hence of distributive justice as a dimension of democratic inclusion. The review concludes with a discussion of how philosophy of education itself might be democratically inclusive, in response to the authors' account of whiteness and their experiences of exclusion. (shrink)
    Direct download(3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  

  • [8]ページ先頭

    ©2009-2025 Movatter.jp