Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


PhilPapersPhilPeoplePhilArchivePhilEventsPhilJobs
Switch to: References

Add citations

You mustlogin to add citations.
  1. Axiom I 0 and higher degree theory.Xianghui Shi -2015 -Journal of Symbolic Logic 80 (3):970-1021.
  • Determinacy and Jónsson cardinals in L.S. Jackson,R. Ketchersid,F. Schlutzenberg &W. H. Woodin -2014 -Journal of Symbolic Logic 79 (4):1184-1198.
    Assume ZF + AD +V=L and letκ< Θ be an uncountable cardinal. We show thatκis Jónsson, and that if cof = ω thenκis Rowbottom. We also establish some other partition properties.
    Direct download(3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Hod up to A D R + Θ is measurable.Rachid Atmai &Grigor Sargsyan -2019 -Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 170 (1):95-108.
  • (1 other version)Maximal almost disjoint families, determinacy, and forcing.Karen Bakke Haga,David Schrittesser &Asger Törnquist -2022 -Journal of Mathematical Logic 22 (1):2150026.
    We study the notion of [Formula: see text]-MAD families where [Formula: see text] is a Borel ideal on [Formula: see text]. We show that if [Formula: see text] is any finite or countably iterated Fubini product of the ideal of finite sets [Formula: see text], then there are no analytic infinite [Formula: see text]-MAD families, and assuming Projective Determinacy and Dependent Choice there are no infinite projective [Formula: see text]-MAD families; and under the full Axiom of Determinacy [Formula: see text][Formula: (...) see text] or under [Formula: see text] there are no infinite [Formula: see text]-mad families. Similar results are obtained in Solovay’s model. These results apply in particular to the ideal [Formula: see text], which corresponds to the classical notion of MAD families, as well as to the ideal [Formula: see text]. The proofs combine ideas from invariant descriptive set theory and forcing. (shrink)
    Direct download(4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • On the prewellorderings associated with the directed systems of mice.Grigor Sargsyan -2013 -Journal of Symbolic Logic 78 (3):735-763.
  • Scales in K(R) at the End of a Weak Gap.J. R. Steel -2008 -Journal of Symbolic Logic 73 (2):369 - 390.
  • Is there a set of reals not in K(R)?Daniel W. Cunningham -1998 -Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 92 (2):161-210.
    We show, using the fine structure of K, that the theory ZF + AD + X R[X K] implies the existence of an inner model of ZF + AD + DC containing a measurable cardinal above its Θ, the supremum of the ordinals which are the surjective image of R. As a corollary, we show that HODK = K for some P K where K is the Dodd-Jensen Core Model relative to P. In conclusion, we show that the theory ZF (...) + AD + ¬DCR implies that R† exists. (shrink)
    Direct download(4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Some applications of coarse inner model theory.Greg Hjorth -1997 -Journal of Symbolic Logic 62 (2):337-365.
    The Martin-Steel coarse inner model theory is employed in obtaining new results in descriptive set theory. $\underset{\sim}{\Pi}$ determinacy implies that for every thin Σ 1 2 equivalence relation there is a Δ 1 3 real, N, over which every equivalence class is generic--and hence there is a good Δ 1 2 (N ♯ ) wellordering of the equivalence classes. Analogous results are obtained for Π 1 2 and Δ 1 2 quasilinear orderings and $\underset{\sim}{\Pi}^1_2$ determinacy is shown to imply that (...) every Π 1 2 prewellorder has rank less than $\underset{\sim}{\delta}^1_2$. (shrink)
    Direct download(8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • The comparison lemma.John R. Steel -forthcoming -Annals of Pure and Applied Logic.
    Direct download(2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • A boundedness lemma for iterations.Greg Hjorth -2001 -Journal of Symbolic Logic 66 (3):1058-1072.
  • An analysis of the models.Rachid Atmai -2019 -Journal of Symbolic Logic 84 (1):1-26.
    Direct download(2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • (1 other version)Maximal almost disjoint families, determinacy, and forcing.Karen Bakke Haga,David Schrittesser &Asger Törnquist -2021 -Journal of Mathematical Logic 22 (1).
    We study the notion of ????-MAD families where ???? is a Borel ideal on ω. We show that if ???? is any finite or countably iterated Fubini product of the ideal of finite sets Fin, then there are no analytic...
    Direct download(4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • In inner models with Woodin cardinals.Sandra Müller &Grigor Sargsyan -2021 -Journal of Symbolic Logic 86 (3):871-896.
    We analyze the hereditarily ordinal definable sets $\operatorname {HOD} $ in $M_n[g]$ for a Turing cone of reals x, where $M_n$ is the canonical inner model with n Woodin cardinals build over x and g is generic over $M_n$ for the Lévy collapse up to its bottom inaccessible cardinal. We prove that assuming $\boldsymbol \Pi ^1_{n+2}$ -determinacy, for a Turing cone of reals x, $\operatorname {HOD} ^{M_n[g]} = M_n,$ where $\mathcal {M}_{\infty }$ is a direct limit of iterates of $M_{n+1}$, (...) $\delta _{\infty }$ is the least Woodin cardinal in $\mathcal {M}_{\infty }$, $\kappa _{\infty }$ is the least inaccessible cardinal in $\mathcal {M}_{\infty }$ above $\delta _{\infty }$, and $\Lambda $ is a partial iteration strategy for $\mathcal {M}_{\infty }$. It will also be shown that under the same hypothesis $\operatorname {HOD}^{M_n[g]} $ satisfies $\operatorname {GCH} $. (shrink)
    Direct download(2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Inner model operators in L.Mitch Rudominer -2000 -Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 101 (2-3):147-184.
    An inner model operator is a function M such that given a Turing degree d, M is a countable set of reals, d M, and M has certain closure properties. The notion was introduced by Steel. In the context of AD, we study inner model operators M such that for a.e. d, there is a wellorder of M in L). This is related to the study of mice which are below the minimal inner model with ω Woodin cardinals. As a (...) technical tool, we show that the alternative fine structure theory developed by Mitchell and Steel for mice with Woodin cardinals is equivalent to the traditional fine structure theory developed by Jensen for L. (shrink)
    Direct download(4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • A Long Pseudo-Comparison of Premice in L[x].Farmer Schlutzenberg -2018 -Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 59 (4):599-604.
    A significant open problem in inner model theory is the analysis of HODL[x] as a strategy premouse, for a Turing cone of reals x. We describe here an obstacle to such an analysis. Assuming sufficient large cardinals, for a Turing cone of reals x there are proper class 1-small premice M,N, with Woodin cardinals δ,ε, respectively, such that M|δ and N|ε are in L[x], M and N are countable in L[x], and the pseudo-comparison of M with N succeeds, is in (...) L[x], and lasts exactly ω1L[x] stages. Moreover, we can take M=M1, the minimal iterable proper class inner model with a Woodin cardinal, and take N to be M1-like and short-tree-iterable. (shrink)
    Direct download(3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  

  • [8]ページ先頭

    ©2009-2025 Movatter.jp