Movatterモバイル変換

[0]ホーム
URL:

PhilPapersPhilPeoplePhilArchivePhilEventsPhilJobs
Switch to: References

Citations of:

Acting from rules: “Internal relations” _versus_ “logical existentialism”

&
International Studies in Philosophy 28 (2):43-62 (1996)

Add citations

You mustlogin to add citations.
  1. An elucidatory interpretation of Wittgenstein's tractatus: A critique of Daniel D. Hutto's and Marie McGinn's reading of tractatus 6.54.Phil Hutchinson &Rupert Read -2006 -International Journal of Philosophical Studies 14 (1):1 – 29.
    Much has been written on the relative merits of different readings of Wittgenstein's Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. The recent renewal of the debate has almost exclusively been concerned with variants of the ineffabilist (metaphysical) reading of TL-P - notable such readings have been advanced by Elizabeth Anscombe, P. M. S. Hacker and H. O. Mounce - and the recently advanced variants of therapeutic (resolute) readings - notable advocates of which are James Conant, Cora Diamond, Juliet Floyd and Michael Kremer. During this debate, (...) there have been a number of writers who have tried to develop a third way, incorporating what they see as insights and avoiding what they see as flaws in both the ineffabilist and resolute readings. The most prominent advocates of these elucidatory readings of TL-P are Dan Hutto (2003) and Marie McGinn (1999). In this paper we subject Hutto's and McGinn's readings of TL-P to critical scrutiny. We find that in seeking to occupy the middle ground they ultimately find themselves committed to (and in the process commit Wittgenstein to) the very ineffabilism they (and Wittgenstein) are seeking to overcome. (shrink)
    Direct download(5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • Wittgenstein among the sciences: Wittgensteinian investigations into the "scientific method".Rupert J. Read -2011 - Burlington, VT: Ashgate. Edited by Simon Summers.
    Engaging with the question of the extent to which the so-called human, economic or social sciences are actually sciences, this book moves away from the search for a criterion or definition that will allow us to sharply distinguish the scientific from the non-scientific. Instead, the book favours the pursuit of clarity with regard to the various enterprises undertaken by human beings, with a view to dissolving the felt need for such a demarcation. In other words, Read pursues a ‘therapeutic’ approach (...) to the issue of the status and nature of these subjects. Discussing the work of Kuhn, Winch and Wittgenstein in relation to fundamental question of methodology, Wittgenstein among the Sciences undertakes an examination of the nature of (natural) science itself, in the light of which a series of successive cases of putatively scientific disciplines are analysed. A novel and significant contribution to social science methodology and the philosophy of science and ‘the human sciences’, this book will be of interest to social scientists and philosophers, as well as to psychiatrists, economists and cognitive scientists. (shrink)
    Direct download(2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Wittgenstein and Marx on ordinary and philosophical language.Rupert Read -2000 -Essays in Philosophy 1 (2):1-41.
    • Home |New books and articles |Bibliographies |Philosophy journals |About PhilPapers |API |Contact us |Code of conduct

    CDPPhiosophy Documentation Center
    PhilPapers logo byAndrea Andrews andMeghan Driscoll.
    This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see ourterms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications).

    Use of this site is subject toterms & conditions.
    All rights reserved byThe PhilPapers Foundation

    Server: philpapers-web-5b9ff6f457-sbjvh uwo
    [8]ページ先頭
    ©2009-2025 Movatter.jp