Switch to: References
Citations of:
Add citations
You mustlogin to add citations.
| |
This paper argues for the need for a better grounded theoretical understanding of the integrity crisis facing much of sub-Saharan Africa. Many of Africa's problems are not unique or peculiar to the region. The paper locates Africa's integrity crisis in the social historical situation characterized by what we term the tribesperson in transition, a phenomenon where people find themselves caught up in tensions, conflicts and anxieties as they attempt to transit from the traditional to the modern. These conflicts, tensions and (...) anxieties create the integrity crisis we are witnessing. Problems are exacerbated by the fact that even the very states themselves are bifurcated along the lines of modern versus tribal/ethnic. Failure to develop national consensus on moral matters, a reluctance of modern states to meet their obligations to their people, and failure to incorporate moral virtues from tribal society into modern contract societies are some of the problems exacerbating the moral problem the region faces. We offer related ideas as avenues to solutions. (shrink) | |
ABSTRACTThe use of humor in advertisements has been the subject of numerous studies, most of which have emphasized humor’s effectiveness while neglecting the ethical issues that it often poses when used in advertising. In response, the authors look at the extent to which humor masks the ethical concerns inherent in offensive advertising. The authors examine advertisements brought before the Austrian Advertising Council, as well as the case-specific decisions made by councilors. With their analysis, they contribute to advertising ethics by turning (...) attention to an important organization in the practice of critiquing advertisements. (shrink) No categories | |
The article presents a legal analysis of the right to physical integrity as guaranteed by the South African Constitution, 1996, and the subsequent right of a competent adult person to refuse medical treatment under South African law. We consider whether the right to refuse treatment is an absolute right and very briefly reflect on the application of the constitutional limitations clause to this right. Instances in which patients’ right to physical integrity is limited by factors, which detract from autonomy, are (...) considered: these represent a limitation of their right to refuse medical treatment. We conclude that forced medical interventions, for the most part, are not desirable but, indeed, necessary in some narrowly defined circumstances. When a person makes a decision to refuse a medical intervention, which may seem unusual or may be perceived as irrational, it does not mean that person does not warrant the protection of the constitution and the courts. Provided that the patient makes an informed refusal while of sound mind, generally there is no reason to discredit his/her decision, difficult as it may be for others to accept. At all times the right to bodily integrity is pivotal in any health-related context and should not be lightly disregarded. (shrink) No categories |
Home |New books and articles |Bibliographies |Philosophy journals |About PhilPapers |API |Contact us |Code of conduct
PhilPapers logo byAndrea Andrews andMeghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see ourterms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications).Use of this site is subject toterms & conditions.
All rights reserved byThe PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-54b44b69b7-cj6sj uwo