| |
Why should contemporary aesthetic production be concerned with making time, rather than history, appear? Vincent Adiutori argues that contemporary aesthetic production’s imperative is to produce rather than resolve contradiction. At a time when making history appear would seem the political task par excellence, to make time appear—as he argues Cormac McCarthy’s The Road does—is the negative task of aesthetics read politically. In short, irony is to time as allegory is to history. No categories ![]() ![]() | |
The formal limit to imagining a post-catastrophic future remains a historical one: how can a novel bent on representing an after, bent on imagining the movement of history as such, do so “in an age,” as Fredric Jameson puts it, “that has forgotten to think historically in the first place.” Brent Ryan Bellamy’s claim is that Steven Amsterdam’s Things We Didn’t See Coming struggles to represent the present historically and that in doing so it strikes at the very limits of (...) post-apocalyptic narrative form. (shrink) No categories ![]() ![]() | |
Davis A. Smith-Brecheisen reviews Diane Coyle's GDP: A Brief but Affectionate Historyand Zachary Karabell's The Leading Indicators: A Short History of the Numbers that Rule Our World. No categories | |
Jen Hedler Hammond reviews Kevin Floyd’s The Reification of Desire: Toward a Queer Marxism. Floyd’s book succeeds in producing a dialogue between Judith Butler and Fredric Jameson that will no doubt have far-reaching consequences for both queer and Marxist theory. But what insight does this dialogue provide into the undertheorized position of women in Marxism and Queer Studies alike? |