This PEP proposes several extensions to the Distutils packaging system[1]. These enhancements include a central package index server,tools for submitting package information to the index and extensionsto the package metadata to include Trove[2] information.
This PEP does not address issues of package dependency. It also doesnot address storage and download of packages as described inPEP 243.Nor is it proposing a local database of packages as describedinPEP 262.
Existing package repositories such as the Vaults of Parnassus[3],CPAN[4] and PAUSE[5] will be investigated as prior art in thisfield.
Python programmers have long needed a simple method of discoveringexisting modules and systems available for their use. It is arguablethat the existence of these systems for other languages have been asignificant contribution to their popularity. The existence of theCatalog-SIG, and the many discussions there indicate that there is alarge population of users who recognise this need.
The introduction of the Distutils packaging system to Pythonsimplified the process of distributing shareable code, and includedmechanisms for the capture of package metadata, but did little withthe metadata save ship it with the package.
An interface to the index should be hosted in the python.org domain,giving it an air of legitimacy that existing catalog efforts do nothave.
The interface for submitting information to the catalog should be assimple as possible - hopefully just a one-line command for most users.
Issues of package dependency are not addressed due to the complexityof such a system.PEP 262 proposes such a system, but as of thiswriting the PEP is still unfinished.
Issues of package dissemination (storage on a central server) arenot addressed because they require assumptions about availability ofstorage and bandwidth that I am not in a position to make.PEP 243,which is still being developed, is tackling these issues and manymore. This proposal is considered compatible with, and adjunct tothe proposal inPEP 243.
The specification takes three parts, theweb interface, theDistutils register command and theDistutils Troveclassification.
A web interface is implemented over a simple store. The interface isavailable through the python.org domain, either directly or aspackages.python.org.
The store has columns for all metadata fields. The (name, version)double is used as a uniqueness key. Additional submissions for anexisting (name, version) will result in anupdate operation.
The web interface implements the following commands/interfaces:
There will also be a submit/edit form that will allow manualsubmission and updating for those who do not use Distutils.
Registration will be a three-step process, involving:
Thesubmit command will require HTTP Basic authentication,preferably over an HTTPS connection.
The server interface will indicate success or failure of the commandsthrough a subset of the standard HTTP response codes:
| Code | Meaning | Register command implications |
|---|---|---|
| 200 | OK | Everything worked just fine |
| 400 | Bad request | Data provided for submission was malformed |
| 401 | Unauthorised | The username or password supplied were incorrect |
| 403 | Forbidden | User does not have permission to update thepackage information (not Owner or Maintainer) |
Three user Roles will be assignable to users:
The index is stored in a set of relational database tables:
An additional table,rego_otk holds the One Time Keys generatedduring registration and is not interesting in the scope of the indexitself.
An additional Distutils command,register, is implemented whichposts the package metadata to the central index. Theregistercommand automatically handles user registration; the user is presentedwith three options:
On systems where the$HOME environment variable is set, the userwill be prompted at exit to save their username/password to a filein their$HOME directory in the file.pypirc.
Notification of changes to a package entry will be sent to all userswho have submitted information about the package. That is, theoriginal submitter and any subsequent updaters.
Theregister command will include a--verify option whichperforms a test submission to the index without actually committingthe data. The index will perform its submission verification checksas usual and report any errors it would have reported during a normalsubmission. This is useful for verifying correctness of Trovediscriminators.
The Trove concept ofdiscrimination will be added to the metadataset available to package authors through the new attribute“classifiers”. The list of classifiers will be available through theweb, and added to the package like so:
setup(name="roundup",version=__version__,classifiers=['Development Status :: 4 - Beta','Environment :: Console','Environment :: Web Environment','Intended Audience :: End Users/Desktop','Intended Audience :: Developers','Intended Audience :: System Administrators','License :: OSI Approved :: Python Software Foundation License','Operating System :: MacOS :: MacOS X','Operating System :: Microsoft :: Windows','Operating System :: POSIX','Programming Language :: Python','Topic :: Communications :: Email','Topic :: Office/Business','Topic :: Software Development :: Bug Tracking',],url='http://sourceforge.net/projects/roundup/',...)
It was decided that strings would be used for the classificationentries due to the deep nesting that would be involved in a moreformal Python structure.
The original Trove specification that classification namespaces beseparated by slashes (“/”) unfortunately collides with many of thenames having slashes in them (e.g. “OS/2”). The double-colon solution(” :: “) implemented by SourceForge and FreshMeat gets around thislimitation.
The list of classification values on the module index has been mergedfrom FreshMeat and SourceForge (with their permission). This listwill be made available both through the web interface and through theregister command’s--list-classifiers option as a text listwhich may then be copied to thesetup.py file. Theregistercommand’s--verify option will check classifiers values againstthe server’s list.
Unfortunately, the addition of the “classifiers” property is notbackwards-compatible. A setup.py file using it will not work underPython 2.1.3. It is hoped that a bug-fix release of Python 2.2 (mostlikely 2.2.3) will relax the argument checking of the setup() commandto allow new keywords, even if they’re not actually used. It ispreferable that a warning be produced, rather than a show-stoppingerror. The use of the new keyword should be discouraged in situationswhere the package is advertised as being compatible with pythonversions earlier than 2.2.3 or 2.3.
In the PKG-INFO, the classifiers list items will appear as individualClassifier: entries:
Name:roundupVersion:0.5.2Classifier:DevelopmentStatus::4-BetaClassifier:Environment::Console(TextBased)..Classifier:Topic::SoftwareDevelopment::BugTrackingUrl:http://sourceforge.net/projects/roundup/
The server is available at:
The code is available from the SourceForge project:
Theregister command has been integrated into Python 2.3.
Originally, the index server was to return custom headers (inspired byPEP 243):
However, it has been pointed out[6] that this is a bad scheme touse.
This document has been placed in the public domain.
Anthony Baxter, Martin v. Loewis and David Goodger for encouragementand feedback during initial drafting.
A.M. Kuchling for support including hosting the second prototype.
Greg Stein for recommending that the register command interpret theHTTP response codes rather than custom X-PyPI-* headers.
The many participants of the Distutils and Catalog SIGs for theirideas over the years.
Source:https://github.com/python/peps/blob/main/peps/pep-0301.rst
Last modified:2025-02-01 08:59:27 GMT