Additional updates made as of 05/31/2011:
For those who might be interested I am in the process of appealing my ban on Wikipedia.
As part of my appeal I was asked by the committee to make a full accounting of any sock puppets that I have used. In response I have admitted to the committee that I have, in fact, employed sock puppets in violation of my ban and I have provided a complete list of the puppets I created to the subcommittee.
As part of my appeal I have pledged to leave the battleground tactics of my past behind me, and I have asked that I be judged going forward by my post-ban behavior rather than any pre-ban behaviors. I believe the primary message to come out of the Climate Change Arbitration which took place during my absence was that battleground tactics will not be tolerated.
I am now taking that message to heart. If I am successful at getting unblocked I plan to do the following:
Much time has passed since I was banned. It is true that I have violated my ban by employing sock puppets. It is true that I vigorously denied that activity at the time and that I said some things which were unkind and hurtful. I hereby apologize for having said those things. The bottom line is that I eventually came to understand that my socking activity was wrong and I have since chosen to stop but I cannot undo what I have already done.
I would hope that my having recognized the error of my ways (both in terms of socking and employing a battleground approach to editing) would count for something in this appeal. I clearly understand that any return to a battleground mentality will result in an immediate return to my current ban.
The committee has decided to ask for community input. The resulting discussion ishere,here, andhere.
UPDATE:
While I have told the committee that I am intentionally avoiding any point by point rebuttals of issues being raised in the above mentioned discussions (to avoid increasing the drama level caused by my appeal) I believe that the following raises a valid and important point:
I note that he has not taken any steps to update the lies, taunts, and attacks in his previous blog entries about other editors who correctly identified his now-acknowledged sockpuppets, nor has he named his sockpuppet accounts in his blog.TenOfAllTrades(talk) 00:18, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
So with that in mind I hereby publicly acknowledge that I was wrong to use sock puppets to evade my ban, and further that in my attempt to conceal my activity I did actively and unfairly lie to, taunt, and attack those who sought to expose those same activities.
To those whom I have wronged in this respect I do hereby offer my sincere apologies. I know that an apology offers little comfort but it is the best I can do at this point. I cannot undo what I have done on wiki. I could delete the posts on this blog but I will instead make this public statement and link to it from each blog entry where I have made false claims. This shall then serve as an enduring reminder of my shame in this matter.
Not all accounts which were suspected of being my sock puppets actually were. As has been already made public on wiki I hereby acknowledge having created and used the following accounts to evade my ban: TheNeutralityDoctor (talk ·contribs),Absit invidia II (talk ·contribs), andCopyright_police (talk ·contribs). I deny all other suspected socks and shall not discuss them further.
UPDATE:
The archived version of the above discussionis here.
Posted inWikipedia Politics
GoRight, per my suggestion on Wiki, which article would you select as the one you would edit?
By:A Quest For Knowledge on May 26, 2011
at 11:43 pm
Two proposals have been added on Wiki. Looks like if you’re allowed back, you get to select a “handful” of articles. I’d still like to know which one(s) you would select. I realize that you might need some time to think about it.
By:A Quest For Knowledge on May 26, 2011
at 11:52 pm
Actually, it looks like with proposal 2, the handful of articles are to be determined by your mentor in consultation with the community. So nevermind my question.
By:A Quest For Knowledge on May 27, 2011
at 12:16 am
I would say that anyone willing to consider returning to a volunteer activity with so many restrictions would have to be sincere.
By:Alex Harvey on May 28, 2011
at 1:51 pm